Food Studies Master Cue Cards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/36

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards generated from the Food Studies Master Cue Cards transcript, covering evidence-based research, validity assessment, food fads, weight-loss claims, food labeling, and nutritional guidelines.

Last updated 10:17 AM on 9/5/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

37 Terms

1
New cards

Nutritional Efficacy

The extent to which a food or meal provides the nutrients and energy a person needs, supporting good health.

2
New cards

Principles of Evidence-Based Research

The three core principles: 1. Recognition of credible sources, 2. Evidence-based information, and 3. Accurate analysis of data.

3
New cards

Credible Source

A source that is trustworthy, unbiased, independent, and produced by experts, such as government agencies, educational institutions, scholarly publications, and journal articles.

4
New cards

Evidence-Based Information

Information supported by current research, large sample sizes, and high-quality research methodology.

5
New cards

Large Sample Size

A research sample size that makes research more representative and increases the reliability of the evidence.

6
New cards

High-Quality Research Methodology

Research methodology that increases the reliability and accuracy of the evidence and helps reduce bias.

7
New cards

Accurate Analysis of Data

Data analysed accurately to produce objective and unbiased conclusions.

8
New cards

Bias (in Research)

A situation where researchers select only data that supports their hypothesis, narrowing the conclusion and reducing the reliability of the research.

9
New cards

S P C P L Criteria

The 5 criteria used to assess the validity of food information: Source, Purpose, Context, Presentation of evidence, and Language use.

10
New cards

Source (Validity Assessment)

Assessment evaluating who the author/publisher is, their credentials, expertise, unbiased nature, and whether there is commercial gain.

11
New cards

Purpose (Validity Assessment)

Determination of why information was created, specifically whether it is intended to inform/educate or to sell a product and make profit.

12
New cards

Context (Validity Assessment)

Assessment considering the reason for the food information and the date it was published.

13
New cards

Presentation of Evidence (Validity Assessment)

Evaluation checking whether research uses reliable methods, peer review/cross-checking, randomised controlled trials, large sample sizes, longitudinal studies, and accessible referencing.

14
New cards

Language Use (Validity Assessment)

Evaluation checking that language is clear, informative, free from bias, based on scientific evidence, and not persuasive or manipulative.

15
New cards

SAC Validity Assessment Sequence

The evaluation order: Source \rightarrow Purpose \rightarrow Context \rightarrow Evidence \rightarrow Language \rightarrow Overall judgement.

16
New cards

Food Fad

An intense enthusiasm for a particular food item or way of eating that is often a short-lived craze.

17
New cards

Diet Assessment Sequence

The step-by-step evaluation process: Diet \rightarrow key features \rightarrow compare with AGHE/ADG \rightarrow assess nutritional efficacy \rightarrow overall judgement.

18
New cards

Paleo Diet (Nutritional Efficacy)

Moderate nutritional efficacy; encourages fruit, vegetables and lean meats but excludes wholegrains and dairy, making it difficult to meet nutrient needs.

19
New cards

Keto Diet (Nutritional Efficacy)

Low nutritional efficacy; high fat and low carbohydrate, cutting out important food groups and being low in fibre.

20
New cards

Whole30 (Nutritional Efficacy)

Moderate nutritional efficacy; encourages whole foods but excludes important food groups, so it is not balanced.

21
New cards

Intermittent Fasting (Nutritional Efficacy)

Good nutritional efficacy; can meet AGHE recommendations if balanced meals containing the five food groups are consumed throughout the day.

22
New cards

Cabbage Soup Diet (Nutritional Efficacy)

Low nutritional efficacy; does not provide all the nutrients needed and does not include all five food groups.

23
New cards

5:2 Diet (Nutritional Efficacy)

Moderate nutritional efficacy; can be balanced on normal days, but getting enough nutrients can be difficult on fasting days.

24
New cards

Weight-Loss & Supplement Claim Criteria (C E E)

The 3 criteria used to assess claims made by weight-loss and nutrient supplement companies: Commercial gain, Ethics, and Effectiveness.

25
New cards

Commercial Gain

The financial profit a company receives from selling its products, requiring consideration of whether company priority is making money or improving consumers' health and wellbeing.

26
New cards

Ethics (in Food Claims)

Assessment of whether information is morally correct and responsible, considering evidence support, misleading terminology, and manipulative language/emotion.

27
New cards

Effectiveness (Food Product Claim)

Assessment of whether the product actually does what the company claims it will do, supported by credible evidence.

28
New cards

"Lite" (Marketing Term)

A marketing terminology that can mislead consumers, as it may refer to colour rather than low energy.

29
New cards

Purposes of a Food Label

To help consumers make decisions, reassure about health/safety, distinguish between products, inform about payment value, provide information for ethical decisions, and provide public health and safety information.

30
New cards

Nutrition Content Claim

A statement made by a manufacturer about the amount of a nutrient, energy or biologically active substance in a food.

31
New cards

Health Claim

A statement informing consumers of a relationship between a food and a health effect, which must be supported by scientific evidence.

32
New cards

General-Level Health Claim

A claim about the relationship between a nutrient/substance and a health effect (e.g., Calcium \rightarrow healthy bones and teeth).

33
New cards

High-Level Health Claim

A claim referring to a serious disease, condition or biomarker and the relationship with a nutrient/substance (e.g., Folic acid \rightarrow reduced risk of foetal neural tube defects).

34
New cards

Difference Between Nutrition Content Claim and Health Claim

Nutrition content claim tells you WHAT is in the food, whereas Health claim tells you the RELATIONSHIP between the food/nutrient and health.

35
New cards

Health Halo Effect

The tendency to overestimate the healthfulness of a food based on one claim or factor while ignoring other relevant information.

36
New cards

Nutrition Information Panel (NIP) Benchmark Values

Sodium: <400mg/100g<400\,mg/100\,g (good) or <120mg/100g<120\,mg/100\,g (better); Sugar: <15g/100g<15\,g/100\,g; Fibre: 3g3\,g per serve; Fat: 10g10\,g or less per 100g100\,g; Dairy: Less than 2g/100g2\,g/100\,g.

37
New cards

Food Literacy

Having the ability to navigate food information and a repertoire of healthy, nutritious meals, allowing individuals to better plan and prepare foods that support healthy eating behaviours.