interwar period

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/11

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

12 Terms

1
New cards

changes in class after WWI

  • decline in deference between WC and MC due to life in trenches, men interacting, and more intermingling of classes

  • decline the class - due to the high death toll

  • decline in aristocracy due to death duties

  • more democratic society due to the 1918 Representation of the People Act ( women over 30 could vote and had to own property, and all men could vote over the age of 21 )

  • death duties, 40% taxation on inheritance over 2 million

  • income tax 57% over 250k

  • decrease in union membership

  • WC owner occupiers rose from 750k in the 20s to 325000 in 1938

2
New cards

continuity in class after WW1

  • still a 3 class social divide

  • rare class conflict

  • impact of WW1 was short term and temporary 

  • high aristocracts still owned houses

3
New cards

The impact of WWI - how much changed

  • decline of deference ( submission and respect - high death toll shook w/c confidence and their social superioritylonger held an automatic respect for those above them

  • intermingling of classes in trenches - greater empathy between soldiers could for the basis for the popost-waronsensus

  • deline in the upper class - death toll was disproportionally high due to them being high senior leaders, 6 peers 16 baronets, 6 knights and 261 sons of aristocrats

  • families forced to pay death duties ( iinheritance tax- many araristocratsouldn't afaffordaito ntain their homes

  • However,,rdo noover exaggerate, te a,nd the duke of Portland owned 8 grand houses, and by the end of the interwarperiod he had 4

  • greater equality - more democratic society -representationnn of the people act

  • trade unions gain important concessions

  • felt more equal and less disadvantaged

4
New cards

class and social values

  • Some feared open class revolt - changes did not lead to social barriers and conventions significantly breaking down

  • 1926 general strike -the MCC attacked strikers and called them unpatriotic class warriors

  • class conflict would wear

  • strikes decline and Tories enjoyed widespread working and mc support

  • great depression served to undermine the Solidarity union members rapidly declining due to unemployment

  • iIn1939, the class system and society were not so different from 1914

  •  

5
New cards

class and social values between the wars - CHANGE

  • Examples of class conflict were in decline,and strikes were in decline

  • great depression reduced solidarity due to a decrease in union membership 

6
New cards

class and social values between the wars - continuity

  • By 1939, the class system and society were not different from 1914

  • stidifferentnce anstillll more struggles e the 1926 general strike

  • Due to the decline in strikes and not a lot could afford to be in a union

  • changes did not lead to social barriers and concentrations significantly breaking down

7
New cards

The upper class CHANGE 

  • Upper class lost a lot of respect however, er this won't be temporary, as they were part of the war many lives lost and lost of land

  • 1937 country house scheme, able to live in a stately home rent-free if transferred to a National Trust stately home

  • rise of labour led to the loss of the upper-class power

  • new upper class emerged based on wealth rather than ancestry because of the increased unwillingness of the gentry to work for a living, rather than receive rent

  • increase in income tax and death duties 

  • ¼ gentry had to sell their lands

  • from 1911 HOL can only delay, nnot blockklegislation 

  • In 1937, 1/3 of othe gentry were landless 

8
New cards

The upper class CONTINUITY

  • cultural events based in lLondonseason was the presentation of aristocrats daughters attended by the royal family and featured a clear identity of the upc

  • 1937 County House Scheme allowed people to retain their lifestyle

  • Nice of new upperclass, no real decline in elite dominance 

  • still played a significant role in determining access to opportunities and positions of influenc.n 

9
New cards

middle class change 

Home ownership became a defining characteristic of middle-class status

  • By 1939, 60% McC were homeowners compared to 20% of the WC.

  • The Wawi gave financial and commercial jobs in London, 34% 

  • increase in white collar jobs 

  • clerking jobs for women 17k in 1911 to 1.4k in 195,1, went to exclusive clubs and societies to differentiate from other classes

10
New cards

middle class conitnuity

  • The traditional divide between the middle and the upper class was still retained

  • McContemporaries blamed trade unions for pushing up wages

11
New cards

working class change

characteristic of the QC

  • skilled workers

Between WW1 and WW2, there were temporary changes

  • trade unions benefit 90%increasee

  • able to negotiate pay but not permanent

Due to the number of conscripts who were turned away on the ground of ill health

  • 1918, 10.3% of urban wWCmen were rejected and 31.3% classified as too sickly

reserved iccyoaton ( coal minders) was valued during the warincreased gov intervention rationing led to improvement in the WC

  • improved life expectancy

those in new industries had improvements in the standard of living

  • became more materialistic

  • job security 

  • Reduced the social stigma of being on welfare 

12
New cards

working class continuity

  • During the pre-SCR time, the lack of serious protests led to a decline in the trade unions 40%

  • growth of consumerism

  • 50% of voters voted for the Tory party between the warsWCc failed to materialise, and they still lived in squalid houses

  • exploitative landlords

  • Inequality in wealth, 0.1% of the population owned 33% of he wealth

very little social mobility