no! more research papers are being published every year
modern applications of evolutionary theory:
medicine/epidemiology
virology, microbiology
conservation biology
modern misapplications of evolutionary theory
adaptationist viewpoints
social darwinism
eugenics
the proportion of each allele in the gene pool
1.0 - everyone has this allele (fixation)
0.5 - half of individuals have this allele
0 - no one has this allele
visualize count data
can show absolute frequencies or relative frequencies, such as proportions or percentages
wider distributions represent a greater amount of variation, peaks represent the most common traits
individuals at one side of a trait distribution contribute more offspring to the next generation, over many generations an evolutionary trend can be seen
positive directional selection: antibiotic resistance to gonorrhea
individuals with phenotypes at one end of distribution do best, mean changes, sometimes changes variation
extremes in populations survive, bimodal patterns may result; can increase variation although selection often reduces variation
can generate polymorphisms: stable, discrete categories of phenotypes, bimodal or multimodal distributions of traits, sometimes a basis for speciation
individuals at both extremes outperform those in the middle, increases variation
cornerstone of human civilization (agriculture, domestication, selective breeding); purposefully guided by humans, often with a goal in mind
selective breeding of animals and plants with desired traits
natural selection, however, has no “goal”
predicts evolutionary change in a trait; a foundational tool in quantitative genetics, can be used to predict evolutionary change
S = selection differential (parents selected + base parents)
R = response to selection (offspring)
h2 = heritability
R=h2S
assumes the trait of interest is not correlated with other traits affecting fitness
the proportion of variation in a trait determined by inherited genes vs the environment; ranges from 0 to 1
if H2=1, all variation in a population is due to genetic differences
if H2=0, no genetic variation, all variation in the population comes from differences in the environments experienced by individuals
not necessarily constant, can be influenced by many factors
precision of measurement
environmental change
migration/gene flow
inbreeding (changes to allele frequency)
does not mean genetic determination; it is an estimate of the proportion of phenotypic variation due to genetic variation, specific to that study
higher heritability and stronger selection differentials will generate stronger responses to selection
can be described by frequencies of alleles and genotypes; an allele’s frequency is calculated using the following formula
p = (2NAA + NAa) / 2N
q = (2Naa + NAa) / 2N
p + q = 1
a null model in which allele frequencies do not change across generations
several conditions must be met for a sexually-reproducing population to be at hardy-weinberg equilibrium
no mutation - allele frequency does not change, and no new alleles are added
no selection - different genotypes have equal survival and reproduction
no gene flow - no movement into or out of the population
population size is infinite - the larger a population, the smaller will be the effect of genetic drift
mating is random - individuals do not preferentially choose mates with certain genotypes
the frequencies of alleles remain constant across generations
we can predict genotype frequencies from allele frequencies
deviations from hwe show evolution is occurring and that nonrandom mating is really important
intrasexual competition
mate choice
historically viewed as “male-male competition” and “female choice for males”, now lots of data for female-female competition and male mate choice
good genes hypothesis: sometimes traits are honest signals of mate quality
runaway sexual selection: offspring will inherit their parents’ ornamental traits and preferences for that trait
majority of evolutionary change occurs at the molecular level, and most genetic variation is due to random genetic drift of alleles that are selectively neutral
provides another null model for molecular evolutions, the rate of fixation of new neutral mutations is independent of population size
m = u
u = neutral mutation rate
m = rate of fixation of neutral mutations
uses the average rate at which a given gene region/protein accumulates changes to gauge the time of divergence between species
mutation can be used as this to calculate evolutionary divergence times between species
must be calibrated using independent data
the fossil record
known times of divergenve
biogeographic data
ratio of number of nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site (dn) to the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (ds)
if dn/ds = 1: neutral, no selection
if dn/ds > 1: positive directional selection (rate of change higher than expected, that DNA sequence is “moving”)
if dn/ds < 1: stabilizing selection (rate of change lower than expected, that DNA sequence is staying put
can turn genes on or off, regulate the amount and timing of gene expression
multiple switches control each gene, creating different expression patterns in different locations
major changes in phenotypes can be driven by amount, timing, and location of gene expression
a visual reconstruction of shared history, may portray evolutionary theory of
all life forms
major evolutionary groups
small groups of closely relates species
individuals
populations
genes
common ancestor: shared by all organisms; in the tree, it forms the root of the tree
vertical distances between branches have no meaning
the vertical order of lineages after a node is arbitrary - you can rotate branches, but you cannot switch branches from different nodes
nodes indicate the timing of splitting events
a speciation event
a gene duplication event
a transmission event
developed the binomial system of nomenclature we still use today, species were based on their appearance
complications:
polymorphisms: multiple phenotypes within one species
cryptic species: two or more species that are indistinguishable but cannot interbreed
biological species concept: species are groups of actually or potentially interbreeding natural populations that are reproductively isolated from other such groups
complications:
asexual reproduction (bacteria)
extinct groups only known from fossils
hybridization between closely-related species
proposes a species is a branch on a phylogeny, which has a history that starts at a speciation event (node) and ends either at extinction or another speciation
complication:
speciation is almost always a gradual process
difficult to determine when the split actually occurs, or what the outcome will be at a single point in time
can all be applied at once, each emphasize different aspects of species or speciation and have different benefits/costs
morphological species concept: convenient for categorizing species but often over/underestimates
biological species concept: focuses on the process by which species split and remain distinct, but fails to explain asexual/hybridizing species
lineage species concept: accommodates asexually reproducing species and extends to the patterns of relationships over evolutionary time
if reproductive isolation is incomplete, hybrid zones may form where population ranges overlap; may persist for long periods.
suffer from a range of defects and do worse than either parental species
zones are narrow b/c there is strong selection pressure against hybrids
reinforces/maintains species barriers
not all reinforce species barriers, some can relax reproductive barriers between species, can act as bridges and move alleles between species, also serve as bridges for parasites
speciation that results when a population is divided by a physical barrier; populations are separated by a physical or geographic barrier, thought to be the dominant mode of speciation
genetic divergence between populations caused by mutation, drift, and adaption to different environments
pairs of sister species (species that are each other’s closest relatives) can arise on opposite sides of the barrier
galapagos finches are famous examples of this
no physical isoltaion, occurs within the same “population”; speciation without physical isolation, may occur via disruptive selection where different genotypes have preference for distinct microhabitats for mating
ecological speciation - divergent natural selection between contrasting ecological environments
another common form is polyploidy - duplication of sets of chromosomes within individuals, can result in complete reproductive isolation in two generations
usually higher in groups with poor dispersal abilities than in highly mobile groups because even narrow barriers can effectively divide species
lineages with strong sexual selection are often associated with high rates of speciation