1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Collins v Wilcock 1984
Core definitions for all 3 torts.
Bird v Jones 1845
restraint has to be total restraint of the person
Cole v Turner (1704)
The least touching of another in anger is battery
Nash v Sheen (1953)
Indirect force suffices
Scott v Shepherd (1773)
intent transfers through intermediaries
R. v Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall, ex parte CEGB (1982)
Good motive does not negate battery
R v Wilson (1955)
Words are sufficient for assault
R v Ireland (1998)
Silence could amount to assault.
R v St George (1840)
If C truly believes they're in danger it's an assault (unloaded gun)
Read v Coker (1853)
D must have capacity to apply force immediately
Tuberville v Savage (1669)
Words indicating there will be no violence may prevent an act from being an assault
Iqbal v Prison Officers Association (2010)
Mere carelessness or negligence is not enough
Wilson v Pringle (1987)
Hostility requirement is suggested
Re F
Casts substantial doubt on Wilson v Pringle
Meering v Grahame-White Aviation
The claimant does not need to know of the imprisonment