Core Influence Principles

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/14

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards defining 15 core influence tactics, psychological mechanisms, and key foundational research studies.

Last updated 8:26 AM on 8/29/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

15 Terms

1
New cards

Reciprocity

A social norm to repay what is given (Gouldner, 1960; Cialdini). It operates by giving a small favor, concession, or information first before making a request, using unequal exchanges to create obligation.

2
New cards

Commitment & Consistency (Foot-in-the-door)

An influence principle based on the desire to appear consistent with prior statements or actions (Festinger; Freedman & Fraser, 1966), executed by securing a small, low-cost agreement before escalating the request.

3
New cards

Social Proof

A mechanism where uncertainty is resolved by observing others' behavior (Sherif, 1935; Cialdini), demonstrated by showing that similar peers or others have already complied.

4
New cards

Scarcity

An influence tactic rooted in loss aversion and reactance amplification when options shrink (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Cialdini), executed by framing an offer as limited in time, quantity, or exclusivity.

5
New cards

Authority

Deference to perceived expertise or status (Milgram, 1963), executed by displaying credentials, titles, uniforms, or confident jargon before making a request.

6
New cards

Liking

A principle where compliance increases with perceived similarity, praise, and familiarity (Cialdini), established by building rapport prior to presenting a request.

7
New cards

Anchoring

A cognitive bias where an initial number or reference point biases subsequent judgment (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974), executed by opening a negotiation with an extreme first offer.

8
New cards

Framing Effects

The phenomenon where logically equivalent options are evaluated differently based on gain or loss framing (Kahneman & Tversky, 1981), shifting risk behavior based on presentation.

9
New cards

Door-in-the-face (DITF)

An influence technique where an extreme request is refused, followed by a moderate request that is accepted due to reciprocal concessions and contrast (Cialdini et al., 1975).

10
New cards

Unity (In-group Identity)

An influence mechanism driven by shared identity ('we-ness') and category membership (family, nation, team) that drives compliance beyond mere liking (Cialdini, 2016).

11
New cards

Loss Aversion

A psychological phenomenon where losses loom approximately 2×2 \times larger than equivalent gains (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979), executed by framing the status quo as something to lose.

12
New cards

Sunk Cost Exploitation

An irrational influence where past irrecoverable investments of time, money, or identity drive continued commitment to future choices (Arkes & Blumer, 1985).

13
New cards

Contrast Principle

A perceptual psychophysics mechanism where the perception of a stimulus shifts based on an immediately preceding comparison, such as showing an expensive option first (Cialdini).

14
New cards

Reactance Theory

A psychological state where a perceived threat to freedom triggers a motivation to reassert that freedom, often via opposite behavior (Brehm, 1966).

15
New cards

Foot-in-the-mouth

A self-generated persuasion technique where opening with a pleasantry like 'How are you feeling today?' elicits positive self-disclosure that primes agreeableness and compliance (Howard, 1990).