Retrieval failure

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/9

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

What is retrieval failure?

A form of forgetting which occurs when we do not have the necessary cues to access memory

2
New cards

What is the encoding specificity principle?

Information is more likely to be forgotten if the cues that were present at encoding are absent at retrieval

3
New cards

What are the two types of forgetting that can occur due to retrieval failure?

State-dependent and context-dependent forgetting

4
New cards

What is state dependent forgetting?

Forgetting which occurs because the emotional or physical state at recall is different to that of the time of learning.

5
New cards

What is context dependent forgetting?

When the external and internal environment at encoding is different at recall.

6
New cards

Which study shows support for context-dependent forgetting?

Godden and Baddeley (1975) – deep sea divers

7
New cards

Outline Godden and Baddeley (1975):

  • Deep sea divers learned a list of words either underwater or on land and then asked to recall the words either underwater or on land, creating four conditions:

  • 1. Learn on land → recall on land

  • 2. Learn on land → recall underwater

  • 3. Learn underwater → recall underwater

  • 4. Learn underwater → recall on land

  • Recall was 40% lower in mismatched conditions as the external cues available at learning were different from the ones at recall = retrieval failure

8
New cards

Which study shows support for state - dependent forgetting?

Carter and Cassaday (1998) – anti-histamine

9
New cards

Outline Carter and Cassaday (1998):

  • Participants were given anti-histamine drugs making them drowsy

  • This creates an internal physiological state different from the ‘normal’ state of being alert and awake

  • Participants had to learn lists of words and passages of prose and then recall info, creating four conditions:

  • 1. Learn on drug → recall on drug

  • 2. Learn not on drug → recall when not on it

  • 3. Learn on drug → recall when not on it

  • 4. Learn not on drug → recall when on it

  • Recall was significantly worse in conditions where there was a mismatch between internal state at learning and recall

10
New cards

Outline evidence for the encoding specificity:

Tulving and Pearlstone (1966):

  • Participants had to learn a list of 48 words belonging to categories

  • Asked to recall the words in one of 2 conditions:

  • Free recall – not given categories

  • Cued recall – given categories

  • Participants in free recall condition recalled 40% of words, whereas participants in cued recall recalled 60% of word