1/72
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
importance
accountants hold positions of trust, people rely on them and their expertise
public interest
need to be able to given an independent view
guidelines can be used as a defence in litigious situations
principles based guidance
active consideration and demonstration of conclusions
encourages compliance
allows for variations in individual and changing situations
can incorporate rules where needed
integrity
being straightforward and honest
objectivity
not allowing bias, conflict of interest or the undue influence of others to compromise judgement
professional competence and due care
maintaining professional knowledge and skills at the level to provide services based on current standards and legislation, acting diligently and as per regulations
confidentiality
respect the confidentiality of information acquired in professional and business relationships
professional behaviour
comply with relevant laws and regulations, and avoid any conduct that may discredit the profession
independence of mind
the state of mind that allows the expression of a conclusion without judgement being compromised, and acting with integrity, objectivity and professional scepticism
independence in appearance
avoiding facts and circumstances that a 3rd party would believe integrity, objectivity or professional scepticism has been compromised
safeguards created by the profession, legislation, regulations
training and experience requirements
CPD
corporate governance regulations
professional standards
regulatory monitoring and disciplinary procedures
external reviews
safeguards in the work environment
other accountants reviewing work
consulting independent 3rd parties, eg regulatory bodies
rotating senior personnel
discussing ethical issues with those in charge of client governance
disclosing the nature of services and the extent of fees with clients
involving other firms to help perform/reperform the audit
mitigating bias
seek expert advice
consult with others to ensure ideas are challenged
training on recognising bias
types of bias
anchoring
automation
availability
confirmation
groupthink
overconfidence
representation
selective perception
public interest entities
a listed company that is significant to the public due to its size, nature or impact. subject to stricter regulations and auditing requirements
banned non-audit services for PIEs
tax services relating to tax forms, payroll, customs, subsidies, calculations and advice
management toles or decision making
bookkeeping, accounting records, preparing FS
payroll services
internal control or risk management procedures
valuation services
legal services
HR services
internal audit function
financing, capital structure, allocation and investment
promoting, dealing in or underwriting shares
self-interest threats
employment with the client
partner on client board
family and personal relationships
gifts and hospitality
loans and guarantees
overdue fees
contingent fees
high percentage of fees
lowballing
financial interests
close business relationships
direct or indirect material financial interests
cannot be owned by the audit firm, partner, member of the team or an immediate family member
financial interests safeguards
disposing of it
removal from the audit team
informing the audit committee
engagement quality reviews
firms need to have procedures for dislcosure
close business relationships
common commercial interest, eg joint ventures
not allowed unless clearly immaterial and insignificant
if not, the audit needs to be ended or the relationship terminated
if it is between an individual, they need to be removed from the team
purchases from clients in the ordinary course of business isn’t usually a threat
dual employment
not allowed
auditor may lose objectivity if they are trying to impress a future employer
if the auditor moves to the client, they will know too much about the procedures and systems
dual employment safeguards
modifying the audit strategy
assigning it to someone with equal experience to prevent intimidation
quality reviews
partner moving to client rules
need to resign as auditors if they have acted for the client in the past 2 years
cannot accept reappointment until 2 years after the partner was involved with the audit or until they leave
partner or employee on client board
not allowed
loan staff assignments
not allowed
cannot work for the client for a temporary period
family or close personal relationships
need to consider responsibilities and closeness
if an immediate family member is a director, officer, or can influence the subject matter, then they need to be removed from the team
policies and procedures for disclosure
quality reviews
discuss with audit committee
gifts and hospitality
can only be accepted if trivial and inconsequential
loans and guarantees
cannot be made to or accepted from clients
unless the client is a bank and it is in the ordinary course of business
overdue fees
need to pay overdue fees before the audit report can be issued
discuss with governance
may need to resign if they aren’t paid
contingent fees
not allowed
fees based on the outcomes
high percentage fees safeguards
dicussing with audit committee
taking steps to reduce dependency
engagement quality reviews
consulting a 3rd party
ICAEW high percentage fees
if total fees from a PIE represent more than 15% of the total fees for 2 years, then it needs to be disclosed to governance and a quality review done
FRC high percentage fees
if total fees exceed 10% or 5% for a PIE, this needs to be disclosed to the ethics partner and governance and safeguards put in place
if they exceed 15% or 10% for a PIE, the firm cannot act
non-audit services PIEs fees
cannot be more than 70% of the total audit fee
lowballing safeguards
maintain records to prove that appropriate staff and time were spent on the engagement
comply with all standards, guidelines and quality management procedures
need to be able to prove the audit was done per the standards
self review threats
employment with the client
preparing accounting records and financial statements
valuation services
internal audit services
corporate finance
employment with client
if someone has been a director, officer or employee with influence over the subject matter in the last 2 years they cannot be on the audit team
preparing accounting records and FS
cannot prepare records and have the same team audit them
different staff members preparing statements and auditing
policies to prevent managerial decisions being made
clients need to originate the source data
clients need to originate and approve the underlying assumptions
valuations
cannot be done if they have a material effect on the financial statements or are highly subjective
valuation safeguards
second partner review
confirming the client understands the valuation and assumptions used
ensuring the client takes responsibility
different staff for the valuation and audit
tax returns
no threat if management takes responsibility
tax calculations
cannot be done for PIEs unless in an emergency
can be done for non PIEs with safeguards
tax planning
only when advice is clearly supported by tax authorities
not when there are doubts and material consequences
assistance in resolving tax disputes
can be done if the subject and effect is material
need to use staff not on the audit team
obtain advice from external tax professionals
tax safeguards
people not on the audit team
reviewed by senior tax employees
external advice
calculations being reviewed
FRC tax rules
cannot promote structures where there is doubt over the accounting treatment and if it is true and fair
cannot play a management role
cannot prepare material tax calculations to a PIE
cannot act as an advocate
internal audit
the same external auditors cannot do the internal audit
corporate finance services
cannot promote, deal in or underwrite a client’s shares
cannot commit a client to the terms of a transaction
can provide structuring advice when there are safeguards and no managemnet decisions are made
cannot be done for PIEs
IT services
not allowed if related to the accounting or finanical management system
litigation support
not allowed if material
advocacy threat
the firm takes a client’s part in a dispute or acts as their advocate
eg defending them in a legal case or negotiations with a bank on their behalf
familarity threat
risk losing independence and professional scepticism when overfamiliar with a client
family and personal relationships
employment with client
long associations
recruitment
long associations
need to monitor relationships
safeguards - rotating senior staff, regular reviews
long associations non PIEs
if a partner has held that role for 10+ years, then they need to be rotated
if not, other safeguards are needed and the reasons for not rotating them documented and communicated to governance
long associations PIEs
cannot act as the engagement partner for more than 5 years
cannot take part in the engagement until another 5 years have passed
some flexibility for if there are unexpected changes in client management, or to maintain audit quality
long associations quality reviewers
cannot be a reviewer for more than 7 years
cannot return to the role for 5 years
recruitment
not allowed
eg advising on the appointment of an employee or a renumeration package
intimidation threat
close business relationships
litigation
family and personal relationships
assurance staff moving to the client
litigation
may pressure the firm to produce an unqualified audit report
risk of losing the client, bad publicity, negligence charges
need to consider the materiality, nature and if the litigation relates to a prior engagement
litigation safeguards
disclosing the nature and extent to the audit comittee
removing affected individuals from the team
involving another professional accountatnt to review the work
resigining if serious
management threat
making judgements and decisions that are the responsibility of management
informed management
can make independent judgements and decisions based on the information provided
understand their roles and responsibilities and those of the auditor
highly experienced
are questioning of the auditors work
accepting new clients
need to consider if there are any ethical issues
need to consider any client factors that will threaten the firm’s integrity, eg illegal activities, dishonesty, questionable accounting policies
need to decline the engagement if safeguards cannot reduce the risks
eg obtaining a commitment to improve corporate governancec
resolving ethical issues factors
facts
parties
fundamental principles
internal procedures
alternative courses of action
best to resolve issues in-house
but can seek guidance from external parties, eg via the ICAEW helpline
confidentiality
a key factor in trust
cannot discuss client matters with anyone outside the firm
cannot discuss client matters with anyone outside the team if there is a conflict of interest
accidental disclosure is more likley than deliberate
data protection
GDPR and Data Protection Act
anyone storing personal data needs to ensure it is protected
can only store personal data if there is a lawful reason or consent was given
people have a right to access their data and know how it is processed
organisations need the data controller to notify the ICO and report any breaches to them
personal data breaches
a breach of security leading to the accidental or unlawful destruction, loss, alteration, unathorised disclosure or access to personal data
personal data breaches examples
unauthorised access to files
leaving documents in a public area
emailing personal data to the wrong person
accidentally deleting files
loss of availability, eg server faults
devices being lost or stolen
cars containing files being broken into and then stolen and read
passing on client details to a 3rd party
downloading a client list before leaving the firm
incorrectly updating contact details for the wrong person
accidental disclosure safeguards
don’t dicuss client matters with people outside the firm
don’t discuss client matters in public places
don’t leave files in cars
only remove working papers from the office if needed
don’t work on electronic working papers on unprotected systems
raise concerns with senior staff
seek legal advice before making disclosures
when can information be disclosed
consent given
public duty
legal or professional right or duty, eg reporting terrorist activities or to comply with prodessional body reviews
money laundering
suspicions need to be reported to the MLRO who makes a report to the NCA
not doing so is an offence, as is tipping off
firms need an MLRO and an MLCP
examples of money laundering
keeping customer overpayments
offences that involve a saved cost
criminal offences under the companies act
conflicts of interest
when an auditor directly competes with a client or has a joint venture with a major competitor
when an auditor performs services for 2 competing or disputing clients
need to evaluate the threats and use safeguards
can’t act for both without consent and if safeguards can’t reduce the risks
conflicts of interest safeguards
disclosing to the clients
obtaining consent from both to act
confidentiality agreements
information barriers - separate audit teams, physical separation of teams, procedures for if information dissemination
ceasing to act