1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Either/or
when someone claims there are only two sides in an argument EX: you can either go w/ me to the party or sit at home and be bored.
False Analogy
assumption that two things share similarities because they have one thing in common EX: Apples, strawberries, and raspberries are all red. They are all fruits. Therefore, all fruits are red.
Argument Ad Populum
a claim that something is true simply bc that's what many people believe EX: the governor has high ratings; therefore, he is doing a good job.
Sweeping Generalization
takes a general idea/rule and applies it to a particular situation EX: Majority of people die in hospitals, so stay out of them.
Reductive Fallacy
makes a complex issue look simply by only considering one aspect of it, simplification EX: Poverty is the result of poor personal choices, such as not working hard enough.
Red Herring
diverts attention from real issues by focusing on an issue that only has a surface relevance, distracts EX: Broken vase w/ muddy pawprints nearby, assumes it's the dog but it's the child.
Snob appeal
arguer claims that if you adopt a particular conclusion, you'll be a member of a special, elit group that's better than everyone else EX: famous people w/ brands
Bandwagon
getting people to believe something because everyone else is doing it EX: Everyone else is going to the party, why can't I go?
Argument Ad Hominem
uses beliefs of the opposing arguer; arguments made based on what other people believe to be true
Flattery
a person uses flattery to appeal to their audience's vanity EX: compliments
Hasty Generalization
claim based on insufficient evidence, experience from examples EX: tourist in NYC concludes that most Americans don't own cars
Post Hoc
assumption of because one event preceded another event, they must be causally related EX: I ate blackberries, and I have a stomachache. Blackberries caused the stomachache
Non sequitur
statement that doesn't follow logically from what preceded it. EX: people died of cancer before cigarettes were invented, therefore, smoking doesn't cause cancer
Begging the question
argument assume the truth of conclusion instead of supporting it EX: People like to eat bc we're biologically influenced to eat
Appeal to False Authority
plays on people's feelings of respect towards a famous person to bypass critical thinking EX: My friend is a nurse, and she says that vaccines are dangerous
Appeal to Pity
ignores argument and appeals to pity to distract audience from lack of reasonable claim EX: Professor, please raise my grade. My grampa died.