1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Schenck v. United States (1919)
speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment and can be limited
Gitlow v. New York (1925)
The First Amendment applies to state law through the Due Process Clause and the 14th Amendment
Feiner v. New York (1951)
The First Amendment permits the government to take action against speech when there is a clear and present danger that will cause a disturbance of the peace
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
A state may not forbid speech advocating the use of force or unlawful unless the speech is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action
Texas v. Johnson (1989)
burning the flag was protected speech under the First Amendment
Wisconsin v. Mitchell (1992)
Enhanced penalties for hate crimes do not violate the defendants rights under The First Amendment
Snyder v. Phelps (2011)
The First Amendment prohibited the imposition of civil liability upon a church and it’s members who picketed the funeral of a slain Marine