1/69
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Who came up with Situation Ethics and in what book?
Joseph Fletcher in ‘Situation Ethics: The New Morality’
What kind of theory is SE?
Relativist, consequentialist, teleological
What does the ‘Middle way’ refer to?
SE meets legalism and antinomianism in the middle
Why did Fletcher feel a middle way was necessary?
Christians in the 1960s were frustrated that the Bible’s strict laws prevented them from exploring freedom and free love movement
What is legalism?
Accepts the absolute nature of established rules and principles
What is antinomianism?
Does not recognise authority, but promotes freedom from external rules
Why did Fletcher take issue with legalism?
Too oppressive/restrictive
People blindly followed it
People obeyed rules even when it harmed them or others
Why did Fletcher take issue with antinomianism?
It was arbitrary
It was inconsistent/unprincipled
It didn’t protect vulnerable in society
What does Fletcher say about the rules in the Bible?
They shouldn’t be abandoned completely but rather used as illuminators
What is the taxi driver anecdote?
Taxi driver says he has always been a Republican. The man he is driving assumes he will therefore vote for the Republican candidate, but the taxi driver says “There are times when a man has to push his principles aside and do the right thing.”
Give a quote by Fletcher about the damage of Christian legalism
“To this day Christians think an adulterer more wicked than a politician who takes bribes, although the latter probably does a thousand times more harm.”
What does Fletcher say about the conscience?
The conscience is not a noun or thing that exists, but rather the process by which we respond to ethical issues
How does SE apply in the case of Mary Magdalene?
Jesus prioritised showing her mercy and agape over following the legalist rule “Thou shalt not commit adultery.”
What is agape?
God’s fatherly love, unconditional and selfless
What is the boss principle of SE?
So long as an action creates the most selflessly loving consequences, it is the right thing to do
What the four working principles?
Pragmatism
Positivism
Personalise
Relativism
What is pragmatism?
Breaking pre-conceived rules can only be justified if the loving consequences are realistically going to occur
What is positivism?
There should be voluntary acceptance of agape and this should be the basis of faith
What is personalism?
SE is a concern for people rather than things and it involves the subject rather than the object
What is relativism?
The loving thing in one situation is entirely independent and doesn’t apply to all other situations
What are the six fundamental principles?
Love is the only good
Love is the ruling norm of Christianity
Love = justice
Love for all
Loving ends justify means
Love decides situationally
What does mitzvot mean?
The 613 commandments in the Old Testament
Give 3 strengths of SE
Supports human nature - love is the most important emotion
Jesus said love was the greatest commandment
Promotes social justice - selfless love
Give 3 weaknesses of SE
Requires us to be able to predict the consequences of an action
Based on a dangerous emotion - could justify evil with love
Ignores Bible’s legalist nature and rules - strays too far
Give a quote from Harry Harlow about the importance of love
“The need for love is overwhelming.”
Give a quote by Pope Benedict about SE
“Dictatorship of relativism.”
Give a quote by Pope Pius XII about SE
“ Individualistic ethic designed to justify actions opposed by God.”
Apply Alan Turing to homosexuality and SE
Created the machine that cracked the Enigma code in WW2 - saved thousands of lives and shortened the war by 4 years
1952: arrested and prosecuted for homosexuality
Sentenced to medical treatment that would “cure” homosexuality
Mental and physical effects led to his death two years later
Ruled suicide, but may have been accidental poisoning
What would SE say about homosexuality?
It would promote the use of agape; homosexual love is still love and so these relationships should be treated indiscriminately
Why may SE disagree with polyamory?
It is arguably difficult to give love equally to more than one person at once, going against love = justice
Why might SE agree with polyamory?
Personalism - they all consent and desire that outcome therefore it is the most loving
Pragmatism - it doesn’t affect anyone outside the relationship and would ensure fulfilment for all
Who developed UT and in what book?
Jeremy Bentham in ‘An Introduction to the Principles of Morality and Legislation’
UT is what type of theory?
Teleological, consequentialist, relativist
Utilitarianism comes from what word?
Utility/Usefulness
UT can be traced back to what Ancient Greek ideology?
Hedonism by Epicurus
Give a quote from Bentham about pleasure and pain
“Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for us alone to point out what the ought to do, as well as what we shall do.”
What are most moral acts in UT?
Those that bring greatest good to greatest number
Give a quote to support this
“It is the greatest good to the greatest number of people which is the measure of right and wrong.”
What is the principle of utility?
The rightness or wrongness of an action is judged by its utility in producing the most pleasure
What phrase does Bentham use to describe happiness?
The sovereign good
Does Bentham/Act prefer quantity or quality? Give a quote to support
Quantity - “The game of push-pin is of equal value to the arts and sciences of music and poetry.”
What did Bentham introduce to help moral agents make decisions?
The Hedonic Calculus
List the seven aspects of the Hedonic Calculus
Purity
Remoteness
Extent
Duration
Intensity
Certainty
To be followed by
Give a strength of the Hedonic Calculus
It is teleological so treats each situation individually
Give a weakness of the Hedonic Calculus
It requires us to predict the outcome of our actions
Give three strengths of Act Utilitarianism
Supports human nature - inherent pursuit of pleasure
Fits a secular society - not based in religion
Hedonic Calculus offers clear guidance
Give three weaknesses of Act Utilitarianism
Pleasure is a dangerous emotion - could be misinterpreted
Could justify cruelty such as five sadistic guards
Happiness isn’t the only important thing to humans- against Nozick experience machine
What are Mill’s three criticisms of Bentham?
Quantitative nature
Harm minorities
Time-consuming
Give a quote from Mill about higher and lower pleasures
“Better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied, better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.”
What is a higher pleasure?
Something that is stimulating to the mind - eg. opera, literature, philosophy
What is a lower pleasure?
Something that is stimulating to the body - eg. food, alcohol, sex
Explain the message of the Covent Garden flower seller story
Higher pleasures > lower pleasures
She only enjoys gin because she has never experienced the opera
Give a quote from Mill about sovereignty
“Over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.”
Why was Mill criticised for his focus on quality over quantity?
It is an elitist attitude and excludes the working class who cannot access higher pleasures
What safeguard did Mill introduce to stop injustice to minorities?
The Harm Principle
Explain the Harm Principle
Everyone should aim to maximise happiness but majority shouldn’t intervene with minority unless it is to prevent harm
What is strong rule utilitarianism?
Rules established through the application of Rule Utilitarianism should never be broken, more deontological
What is weak rule utilitarianism?
Some rules can be broken if the goal is to achieve maximum happiness, more teleological
Give three weaknesses of Rule Utilitarianism
Not acceptable in post-modern society - elitist attitude
Not fluid enough (strong RU)
No concrete way of measuring happiness - it is not quantifiable
Give a quote from Bentham about animal suffering
“The question is not can they reason nor can they talk? But, can in suffer?”
What does this quote suggest about Bentham’s attitude towards animals?
He believes the interests of humans and animals are worth the same because both can experience pleasure and pain.
What is Bentham’s view on animal experimentation?
He believed medical experimentation is an acceptable reason to kill animals because there is a clear purpose - so long as the animal is not made to suffer unnecessarily.
Did Mill value animal life the same way as human life?
No, despite the harm principle, animals cannot experience higher pleasures so according to Mill human life would be valued higher.
What does Peter Singer say about speciesism?
If we justify animal experimentation because human life is more important, we are using the same argument that supports white supremacy or subjugation of women.
What would Act Utilitarianism say about animal experimentation?
Requires we use Hedonic Calculus, and if the pleasure brought from experimenting on animals outweighs the animals’ suffering, it is the right thing to do.
What would Rule Utilitarianism say about animal experimentation?
It is acceptable to inflict suffering upon those less capable of higher pleasures for the sake of those who are capable of experiencing them.
What is the nuance of the debate surrounding nuclear weapons?
The debate is not whether it is ethical to use them, but whether it is ethical to possess them to use as a deterrent.
What does Bentham say about the use of nuclear weapons as a deterrent?
Bentham lived before the invention of nuclear weapons but was concerned with the prevention of war. He believed the best war to avoid war was peace treaties and countries working together towards disarmament.
What does Mill say about the use of nuclear weapons as a deterrent?
Mill lived before the invention of nuclear weapons, but wrote in the context of the American Civil War that despite much suffering, war could be justified by the greater happiness that could result.
What is the principle of discrimination and how does it link to Rule Utilitarianism?
The principle that determines who are appropriate targets in war and who should be immune from attack.
Rule Utilitarians may argue it is acceptable to have nuclear weapons so long as there is no realistic threat to human life.