1/30
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Which foreign markets to enter
The choice must be based on an assessment of a nation’s long-run profit potential based on:
Size of the market
Present and likely future wealth of consumers: purchasing power
Costs and risks
Suitability of firm’s products to that market
Nature of indigenous competition
Overall, determine which are the most attractive markets
Considerations when entering foreign markets
Timing of Entry
Scale of Entry
Strategic Commitments
Timing of entry
Early: entera a foreign market before other foreign firms (first-movers)
Late: enters after other IBs have already established in a market
First mover advantages
Ability to preempt rivals and capture demand
Build sales volume - ride down the experience curve
Create switching costs: make it difficult for others to enter & tie clients
First mover disadvantages
Learning the rules of the game
Costs of business failure
Costs of promoting and establishing a product offering
Regulations may change
Educate customers
Strategic commitment
Use when the entry is of large-scale
It has a long-term impact and is difficult to reverse
Must demonstrate aggressive competition
If it is not credible/feasible it will benefit competitors
Large-scale market entry considerations
Important influence on competition market nature
It is costly, risky, and lacks of flexibility (investments cannot be reallocated in the future)
Small-scale market entry considerations
Adv. you can learn about a foreign market without risking resources
Disadv. it limits the firms’ exposure to the market
Entering in Foreign Markets modes
Exporting
Turnkey projects
Licensing
Franchising
Joint ventures
Subsidiaries
Acquisitions
Greenfield ventures
** apartir de joint ventures, hay más inversión y presencia *
Exporting advantages and disadvantages
Advantages: avoid costs of establishing
achieve experience curve and location economies
Disadvantages: high transport costs & trade barriers can make exporting uneconomical
May lose control when important decisions are delegated
Turnkey project def.
When the contractor agrees to handle every detail of the project for a foreign client, including the training of operating personnel
Used for large projects that often include the construction of big plants
Contratistas
Adv. of turnkey project
earning great economic returns from an asset
useful where FDI is limited by host-government regulations
less risky than conventional FDI (i.e. if there is political instability, better to use it)
Disadv of turnkey project
No long-term interest
Selling competitive advantage to potential and/or actual competitors
Creating new competitors
Licensing def.
Grant the rights to intangible property to another entity for a specified period in change of royalty fee
Employed by manufacturing firms
Franchising def.
A type of license
Longer-term commitments
Strict rules on how to do business
Employed primarily by service firms
Transfer or practices- standarization
Advantages of licensing/franchising
don’t deal with the development costs and risks
Overcome barriers to investment
Build global presence quickle
Used when the firm has intangible property but does not want to develop the product
Disadvantages of licensing/franchising
No tight control
Limits the ability pf using profits in country A to country B
Lose tech control
Depends on local property rights legislations
** franchising has a bit more control than licensing *
Def. Joint venture
Establishing a firm that is jointly owned by two or more otherwise independent firms
Adv. of Joint Venture
Local partner’s knowledge of the host country
Shared costs and risks
In some countries, due to political considerations it’s the only feasible entry mode
Disadv. of Joint venture
Giving control of its technology
Lose of tight control over subsidiaries
Conflicts for control between the investing firms
Def. of Subsidiaries
A firm that you own 100%
Can be done through two ways:
greenfield ventures: start a firm from 0
acquisitions: buy a firm
pressures for cost reduction >, more likely to pursue subsidiaries (also exports)
Adv. of subsidiaries
Control over technology and operations
100% of the profit
Location and experience curve economies
Tight control that might be required for coordinating a globally dispersed value chain
Use profits in one market to improve in other market
Disadv. of subsidiaries
It is costly and risky
Adv. of acquisitions
Quick to execute
May help preempt competitors
Disadv. of acquisition
Risk of overpaying
Culture clash
Integration often takes longer than expected
Inadequate preacquisition screening of potential targets
Inability to predict possible failure scenarios
Adv. of greenfield ventures
Greater ability to build the kind of subsidiary the company wants
Risky (but may be less risky than acquisitions)
Disadv. of greenfield ventures
Slower to establish
Preemption by global competitors
Select an entry mode based on core competences
Technological know-how: Subsidiaries & exports (licensing and joint-venture may be avoided)
Management know-how: licensing/ franchising or joint ventures (more complicated to imitate)
Process of making alliances
Select a strategic partner
Contracts: specify the structure of the alliance, decreese the risk of opportunism by a partner
After it is done, you have to manage it: learning from both experiencies, applying it to the company. Maximize benefits from the alliance
Advantages of alliances
Facilitate entry into a foreign market
Share fixed costs and risks
Combine complementary skills and assets: i.e. development of covid vaccines (bion tech & pfizer)
echnological standards: coordinate with other firms to set up new standards
Disadv. of alliances
Unless a firm is careful, may give away more than it receives