Lecture 9: Fundamental Rights and Freedom of Speech – Key Terms

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
linked notesView linked note
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
New
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/35

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering key concepts, rights, and landmark ideas from the lecture on fundamental rights and freedom of speech.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

36 Terms

1
New cards

Article 14

Equality before the law and equal protection of laws; a fundamental guarantee against arbitrariness.

2
New cards

Article 15

Prohibits discrimination by the state against citizens on specific grounds (religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth) with certain exceptions.

3
New cards

Article 16

Equality of opportunity in public employment; bans discrimination on grounds like religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth, descent, and residence with exceptions.

4
New cards

Reservation (Affirmative Action)

Policy to reserve benefits for socially and educationally backward classes; includes 2019 expansion for economically weaker sections (EWS).

5
New cards

Affirmative Action

Policy to boost representation of disadvantaged groups in education and employment.

6
New cards

Article 17

Abolition of untouchability; its practice is forbidden and punishable; an absolute fundamental right.

7
New cards

Atrocities Act

Legislation linked to Article 17 aimed at protecting Dalits and addressing untouchability and its offences.

8
New cards

Article 18

Abolition of titles; titles are not conferred by the state except for academic or military distinctions; no private citizen may accept foreign titles.

9
New cards

Right to Freedom

Part III rights (Articles 19–22) detailing fundamental freedoms, including speech, assembly, association, movement, residence, and profession.

10
New cards

Article 19(1)(a)

Freedom of speech and expression; available to citizens (not aliens); broad protective ambit with reasonable restrictions.

11
New cards

Judicial Creativity

Supreme Court's interpretive ability to expand fundamental rights beyond their written scope.

12
New cards

Inferred Rights

Fundamental rights inferred by courts from existing rights (e.g., right to information, right to remain silent, right to fly the national flag).

13
New cards

Right to Information (RTI)

Originally statutory under RTI Act 2005; later expanded by courts as a fundamental right in certain contexts (election transparency).

14
New cards

Informed Choice Right

Courts recognize a right to information to voters about candidates to enable informed electoral choices.

15
New cards

Right to Fly National Flag

Inferred fundamental right under freedom of speech; includes private hoisting of the national flag.

16
New cards

Right to Remain Silent

Inferred right under freedom of speech; allows choosing not to speak.

17
New cards

Freedom of Press

Not explicit in the Constitution; courts have treated press freedom as part of Article 19(1)(a) through interpretation.

18
New cards

Censorship

Prior restraint on publication or broadcasting; differs from certification; not constitutionally explicit in India.

19
New cards

CBFC (Central Board for Film Certification)

Authority certifying films; can require cuts or changes; role has evolved from mere certification to censorship-like functions.

20
New cards

Hicklin Test

Obscenity standard based on isolated passages to deprave or corrupt; gradually replaced by contemporary morality standards in India.

21
New cards

Contemporary Standards of Morality

Current societal norms used to judge obscenity rather than the older Hicklin test.

22
New cards

Ranjit D. Udeshi v. Maharashtra

Landmark obscenity case shaping the shift away from Hicklin toward context and contemporary morality.

23
New cards

Lady Chatterley’s Lover case

Illustrative obscenity case; contributed to evolving obscenity standards in India.

24
New cards

Sedition (IPC 124A)

Crime of generating disaffection against the government established by law; historically used to curb dissent; later contested.

25
New cards

Deshdrohi

Deshi-destrohi: disaffection against the nation (Desh) rather than government; introduced in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BN S) 2020 as section 152.

26
New cards

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BN S)

New penal code replacing IPC; section 152 defines disaffection against the nation and related crimes; emphasizes deshdrohi over sedition.

27
New cards

Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015)

Landmark verdict distinguishing advocacy from incitement; speech is protected unless it incites imminent violence.

28
New cards

Contempt of Court

Disobedience or scandalizing of the court; two kinds: civil contempt (willful non-compliance) and criminal contempt (scandalizing or obstruction).

29
New cards

Defamation

Right to reputation; protects against false statements harming a person's reputation; libel (written) vs slander (spoken).

30
New cards

Hate Speech

Speech that attacks or promotes hatred against protected groups; not protected under right to free speech when it advocates violence or discrimination.

31
New cards

Public Order (as a restriction)

One of eight reasonable restrictions; aims to maintain peace and safety; can trigger a chilling effect or heckler’s veto in controversial works.

32
New cards

Sovereignty and Integrity of India

Restriction on free speech when expression threatens the nation's territorial integrity or sovereignty.

33
New cards

Security of the State

Restriction on speech to protect national security and prevent material that could jeopardize state safety.

34
New cards

Friendly Relations with Foreign States

Restriction when speech or actions harm India's relations with other states.

35
New cards

Morality/Decency

Restriction based on evolving social norms of decency and obscenity; debated for subjectivity and cross-cultural variation.

36
New cards

Public Interest vs Public Fascination

Judicial distinction used to determine whether information about public figures should be disclosed; public interest justifies disclosure, fascination may not.