1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
theory of mind
the ability to attribute mental states to oneself and to others
when we use theory of mind
reflexively (gaze following) and strategically (predicting behavior and creating counter-strategies)
spectrum of theory of mind
understanding goals —> understanding perceptions —> understanding knowledge —> understanding beliefs
understanding goals in human
infants 9+ months old showed more impatience when an experimenter dropped a toy on purpose than by accident, 6 month old infants looked longer when an experimenter not a mechanical claw reached for an object that was different from the one they showed interest in
understanding goals in great apes
chimps, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans anticipated the goal-directed action of the human hand but not a mechanical claw, capuchins got annoyed when experimenters were unwilling, not unable, to give them food
understanding goals
what do they want?
understanding perceptions
what do they see/hear?
understanding knowledge
what do they know? what do they not know?
understanding beliefs
full blown theory of mind, what do they believe? is their belief in alignment with reality?
understanding perceptions in humans
understanding attentional states and communicative cues, tracking vs exploiting communicative cues
understanding attentional states and communicative cues
gaze following: present in all primates but varies across species, emerges as early as 6 months in infants; gestural communication
tracking vs exploiting communicative cues
2 year olds use gaze alteration, head/body orientation, and pointing to determine location of hidden food (chimps don’t)
understanding perception in chimps
can track social cues (gaze following) but not exploit them as socio-communicative cues
chimp social systems
high competitive feeding ecologies, no communicative gestures when foraging in the wild, not motivated to share information, to out-compete others: track social information, conceal behavior, exploit a competitor’s perspective for personal benefit
visual perspective taking in chimps
part of understanding perceptions, subordinate chimps and capuchins will choose food that a dominant cannot see, attributing knowledge to a particular individual and reacting accordingly rather than attributing to a dominant
understanding false beliefs in humans
full-blown theory of mind, emerges at 4-5 years old, understanding that others can have beliefs that are different from your own and from reality, behavior is driven by beliefs about reality even if false, sally-anne test
understanding belief in chimps
cannot attribute false beliefs to others, subordinates did not obtain more food when the dominant was misinformed
implicit false belief
anticipatory looking via eye tracking, looking time via violation of expectation, seen in 15 month old humans, unclear if present in chimps
explicit false belief
sally-anne test (verbal/behavioral response), seen 4-5 year olds but not in chimps
4-5 year old humans
can track, predict, and exploit (cooperation and competition) all ways of knowing in both collaborative and competitive scenarios
chimpanzees
can track, predict, and exploit, but only in competitive contexts; better at tool use, causal reasoning, spatial memory, aggression; understanding beliefs: can track and predict but not exploit
monkeys
can track, most can predict, mostly old monkeys can potentially exploit but mostly competitive, not much is known about beliefs
bonobos
better at gaze following, food sharing, cooperation, social play