1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Cybercrime
a crime in which a computer is the object of the crime or is used as a toolp to commit an offence
categories of cybercrime
Cyber-dependent crime
Cyber-enabled crime
Cyber-supported crime
what are 2 important principles of criminal law
nullum crimen sine lege = no crime without law
nulla poena sine lege = no punishment without law
nullum crimen sine lege
a person should not face punishment except for an act that was criminalized by law, before it was performed
nulla poene sine lege
a person can only be punished for doing something if a penalty for this behaviour is already fixed in criminal law
what are the consequences of the nulla poene and nullum crimen principles?
a new crime cannot be created by analogy
a new crime cannot be created by extensive interpretation
criminal law does not apply retroactively
what is the problem with regulating cybercrime?
cyberspace is not limited by national borders
while criminal law follows a national approach (jurisdiction, investigation, prosecution, offences)
what is the solution to the fact that cyberspace is not limited by national borders?
national laws + international required
for gathering information, for extraditions, for transferral of proceedings and / or sentences
what are the obligations established by the Budapest convention?
obligation on states to establish criminal offences
obligation to create jurisdiction
obligations to create investigative powers
obligations regarding international cooperation
types of offences in the cybercrime convention
First category of offences
Second category of offences
Third category of offences
First categories of offences
crimes against confidentiality, availibility, and integrity of computer systems
which articles in the cybercrime convention are first category of offences?
art. 2 - 6 CC
second category offences
versions of established crimes which involve the use of computers
which articles in the cybercrime convention are second category of offences?
art. 7 - 8 CC
Third category offences
content related crimes
which articles in the cybercrime convention are second category of offences?
art. 9 - 10 CC
how does the cybercrime convention work
split into 3 pillars (criminalized conduct, procedural rules, international cooperation)
emphasis on harmonization = ensuring that counties have similar criminalized conduct for cybercrime so that cybercrime perpetrators cannot escape to another jurisdiction
what is criminalized conduct in the cybercrime convention?
illegal access
illegal interception
data interference
misuse of devices
fraud and forgery
child pornography
intellectual property right offences
procedural rules in the cybercrime convention
expedited preservation = ordering an ISP to freeze data so a suspect does not delete it before it is warranted
search and seizure = power to search cloud data or physical harddrives
interception = right to listen in on data
international cooperation in cybercrime convention
Extraction
MLA = mutual legal assistance
spontaneous information
expedited preservation
MLA for accessing computer data
24/7 points of contact
hacking
unauthorized intrusion into a computer or network
phreaking
using a computer or other device for tricking telephone systems to obtain free calls
cracking
breaking into someone else’s computer system to bypass passwords or licences, or in other ways to intentionally breach computer security
R v Bennet
example case of employment hacker
Superintendent Bennet used the police national computer (PNC) system to identify his ex wife’s new partner
by using detailed he had gathered on him from observation
R v Bonnet
a part-time law enforcement officer was accessing the PNC without authority
to find out who owned a specific car using its registration number because he wanted to buy it
DPP v Bignell
insider hacker
the respondents were 2 married police officers, Paul and Victoria Bignell
they accessed the PNC to extract details of motor vehicles owned by Mr Howell
Mr Howell was the new partner of Paul’s ex wife
R v Gouden
external hacker
a software contractor in dispute with a client over unpaid fees “locked the clients computer system by installing a security program
the software contractor refused to hand over the password until the fees were paid
McKinnon v Government of the US
Example of external hacker that involved collaboration between the US and UK regarding extradition
A UK hacker gained, from the UK, access to a number of US military sites, including the Department of Defense, the US Army, Navy, and NASA.
He appears to have been originally motivated by a desire to discover evidence of extraterrestrial visits and technologies which he, in common with other UFOlogists, belives are held in US military files.
what are examples of cybercrimes which are not covered by the cybercrime convention, but are covered by national law?
The “419 advance fee” fraud
the russian scam
card not present fraud
The russian scam
The victim is usually selected from a dating site or
singles site.
They are contracted by a young woman
who claims to be looking to marry a UK, NL, DE, etc.
citizen.
She will often send pictures and will spend some
time communicating with the victim by email, social
media, or perhaps even by telephone.
The fraudster will then make requests for funds. These
may involve payments for medical expenses for the
young woman’s mother, or for assistance with housing
costs.
She will then indicate that she is willing to travel
to meet the victim and will ask for expenses for visas,
travel tickets, and hotel rooms.
The fraudster then
disappears with the funds.
Card not present fraud
The fraudster gets hold of credit card details by using discarded credit card receipts, or by ‘skimming’ a card in a restaurant, or shop, or by ‘phishing’ for such details online.
Once these details are known the fraudster may purchase goods or services online
He might also choose to sell the information to third partie
phishing
a type of cyberattack where scammers trick individuals into revealing sensitive information
by impersonating a trusted organization or person via email, text, or social media
The ‘419 advance-fee’ fraud
The victim receives an email from someone claiming to represent a company or individual with a large sum of money or similar assets which they require to transfer
They claim to have no ability to transfer the funds or assets directly themselves, usually due to banking regulations or some other legal impediments.
They ask the victim for their assistance in making the transfer and in return offer them 10-40% of the value of the asset or funds
R. v Brown (UK)
facts
Mr Brown sold through his website the “Anarchist Cookbook” - a publication that included recipes for the manufacture of bombs, explosives and poisons.
Although he was not motivated by ideology but rather financial gain, he did accept that the information would be useful for terrorists and made no attempt to control the dissemination of the material.
As a result, he was convicted of collection or making a record of information likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism under Terrorism Act 2000 and selling and distributing terrorist publications under Terrorism Act 2006
question
Does the prosecution of Mr Brown constitute a violation of his freedom of expression under Article 10
ECHR?
reasoning
No breach of Article 10 ECHR - The right to freedom of expression includes the right to impart information and ideas without interference by public authority.
It is, however, subject to restrictions prescribed by law and necessary in a democratic society in the interests of, among other things, national security, public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, and for the protection of the rights of others.
Consequently, there are occasions when it is legitimate and permissible for the right to freedom of expression to be curtailed. Acts of terrorism violate the rights of others - in particular their right to life.
Therefore, proportionate interference with the right to freedom of expression in order to reduce, diminish, or extinguish acts of terrorism is legitimate