1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Dominant Strategy
player makes the same choice in all scenarios
Secure strategy
Extreme risk aversion to avoid the worst payoff
Nash Equilibrium
set of strategies where neither player has regreats with their chosen strategy, holding constant their rival’s choice
Profit Maximization
found where MR=MC
Social Efficiency
Found where D=MC
Inefficiency
When firms with market power under produce relative to the socially efficient output (Qf<Qe), society loses out on a net benefit
strategic sustainability
when firms voluntarily incorporate sustainable business ventures in an effort to increase profits
Carbon Offsets (or voluntary emission reductions)
involve reducing, avoiding, destroying, or sequestering the equivalent of a ton of GHG in one place to “offset” an emission taking place somewhere else
Carbon Permits (or cap-and-trade)
involve government restricting the overall amount of a GHG by limiting the number of permits issues and then allowing those permits to be traded in the open market
Tradable pollution permits
government issues pollution permits that pertain to a permissible level of pollution and then government lets the firms trade the permits as desired
Market power
exists when firms are able to restrict competition to sustain prices above marginal cost
Market Strategies to restrict competition
Guarding trade secrets
control of an essential resource
exclusive contracts and customer lock-in
Collusion
Non-market strategies to restrict competition
Government licensing
patent or copyright protection
trade regulations
government or NGO certification
Optimal Sales Target (Qf)
Marginal revenue = Marginal cost
Optimal Price
Markup over cost where the markup factor depends on demand. More inelastic demand results in a higher mark up over costs
Inelasticity
Closer to zero, supports a higher price
Elasticity
Closer to -oo, needs a lower price
Imperfect price discrimination
Groups of consumers are charged different prices, based on their different willingness to pay (elasticity)
Consumer surplus decreased, but not to 0
Perfect price discrimination
each consumer is charged a price equal to her willingness to pay
No social inefficiency occurs but all market surplus goes to the producer (CS=0)
Profits are increased relative to imperfect price discrimination