Quantitative Research Methods Lecture 4

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/16

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

17 Terms

1
New cards

according to the HPCSA, what are the key ethical principles when conducting research

non-maleficence, confidentiality, beneficence, justice, informed consent, right to withdraw

2
New cards

beneficence

do good that benefits the participants (benefits > risk)

3
New cards

non-maleficence

do no harm to the participants

4
New cards

what must participants be conformed about

  • the purpose of the research

  • methods used

  • potential risks and benefits

  • their rights to withdraw without repercussion

5
New cards

right to withdraw

participants must be allowed to withdraw at any point without any repercussions

6
New cards

confidentiality

researchers must protect privacy of participants and keep their information confidential

7
New cards

how can you keep confidentiality

  • use pseudonyms

  • store information in secure location

8
New cards

avoid deception

deception should be avoided unless absolutely necessary and justified 

9
New cards

debriefing

after, participants should be debriefed especially in cases where deception was used

10
New cards

respect for persons

treat all participants with respect, acknowledge their dignity and integrity

11
New cards

fair participant selection

selection of participants should be fair and avoid any form of discrimination

12
New cards

justice 

participants must be treated justly and in accordance with what is right 

13
New cards

what violations happened in the Stanford prison experiment

  • no clear informed consent

  • extreme emotional distress

  • researcher acted as the warden as well as the principal researcher → objectivity compromised

  • researcher did not immediately stope the abuse

14
New cards

what ethical violations happened in the Migram Obedience Study

  • extreme psychological distress (non-maleficence)

  • deception

  • no proper informed consent or debriefing

15
New cards

what ethical violations happened in Little Albert

  • no informed consent

  • no attempt to de-condition the fear

  • potential long term psychological trauma

16
New cards

what ethical violations happened in the monster study 

  • severe psychological trauma 

  • no informed consent 

  • exploitation of a vulnerable population which violates principles of fair selection 

17
New cards

what ethical violations happened in the Tuskgee Syphilis Study

  • no informed consent

  • deception

  • withdrawal of medical treatment

  • exploitation of a marginalised group