1/11
Pragmatics
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Deductive inference
Cannot be cancelled - must be true if the premises are true
Entailment is a form of deductive inference
E.g.: All the beans in this bag are white —> this bean is from this bag = this bean is white
Induction
Statistical generalisation
Probable but not confirmed
E.g.: million beans in bag, first 1000 are white —> all beans in this bag are white
Abduction
Needed for hypothesis forming
Produces hypotheses we can then test
Uses set of observations to reach most likely conclusion
Conclusion considered (likely) to be true, doesn't have to be
Implicatures are abductive inferences - hypotheses the speaker can entertain
Presuppositions are abductive in nature
Entailment
Something that must be true if the premises are true.
semantic in nature
not defeasible
cannot disappear in any linguistic or non-linguistic context
Tests for entailment
Lost with negation
Lost with interrogation
Cannot be directly contradicted (bought him roses but didn’t buy him flowers)
Presupposition
Piece of information or proposition whose truth is taken for granted in the utterance of a sentence
Speakers or utterances carry presuppositions but not sentences
Tests for presupposition
Holds if negated
Holds in interrogation
Cancellable/fallible (abductive in nature)
Presupposition triggers
Factive verbs
It-clefts
Pseudo-clefts
Definite determiners
Temporal clauses
Wh-questions (interrogation/negation tests don’t work here)
Iterative expressions
Counterfactual conditions
Things that do not presuppose
Reporting verbs cancel a presupposition
Clefting in French doesn't always carry the same presupposition that it would in English
If-clauses/hypotheticals do not presuppose
Inconsistency with background assumptions or real-world knowledge
Presuppostions can be suspended by ‘reduction arguments’ - arguments that proceed by eliminating each of the possibilities - in discourse
Truth conditions
Conditions that the world must meet for the sentence to be true
Upward entailment
From subset to set (every woman is roasting beef —> every woman is cooking)
Downward entailment
From set to subset (no woman is cooking —> no woman is roasting beef)