1/77
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Central nervous system
brain and spinal cord
Peripheral nervous system
Somatic and Autonomic
Autonomic splits into
sympathetic (fight or flight) and parasympathetic (rest/digest)
Neurons
transmit electrical and chemical messages
The endocrine system
System of glands that release hormones into bloodstream
Pituitary
master gland
Adrenal
stress hormones
Thyroid
metabolism
Strengths of the biological approach
Highly scientific- uses objective measures (brain scans, genetics)
Contributed to development of effective treatments (drug theory)
Provided clear explanations for many mental illnesses
Integrates well with other approaches
Weakness of biological approach
Reductionist- oversimplifies behavior to biology alone
May ignore role of environment and personal experience
Deterministic- suggests behaviors pre-programmed by biology
Ethical concerns with biological research
Dement and Kleitman
Aim: to determine the connection between dreaming and eye movement
7 adult males and 2 adult females slept in a lab, hooked to a EEG and were woken at different times to be asked about their dreams. They were woken 5-15 minutes into REM and asked if they had been dreaming for 5 or 15 minutes.
All had REM periods for various lengths of 3-30 minutes
REM is strongly associated with dreaming
Dream duration correlated with length of REM period
There was correlation between dream content and eye movements
Participants more likely recalled dreams when woken during rem
Dement and Kleitman strengths
Highly controlled laboratory conditions
Objective measures (EEG)
Provided scientific evidence linking REM sleep and dreaming
Dement and Kleitman weaknesses
Artificial sleep environment- low ecological validity
Small sample size- low generalizability
Sleep patterns could be affected by being observes
Males: Higher levels of _____ are linked to aggression and risk taking.
testosterone
Females: Higher levels of ___ are linked to nurturing behavior and emotional regulation
Estrogen and progesterone
Hassett et al
Aim: To examine whether male and female mokeys show sex typed toy preferences
34 rhesus monkeys give access to two toy types:
wheeled (masculine) and plush (feminine). Researchers recorded time spent interacting with each toy type compared results between males and females.
Male monkeys preferred wheeled (masculine) toys significantly more
female monkeys played with both toy types about equally
Findings suggest toy preferences may have a biological component
Supports idea that sex differences in behavior are partly innate
Hasset et al strengths
Controlled for human cultural influence by monkeys
Clear operational definition for toys
Supports biological explanation for sex differences in play
Hasset et al weakness
Ethical issues with animal research
Small sample size limits generalizability
Findings may not perfectly translate to human behavior
Localization of brain function
Refers to the idea that specific parts of the are responsible for specific functions such as movement speech and memory.
Frontal lobe
reasoning, planning, movement, and problem solving
Parietal Lobe
Sensory perception, spatial awareness
Temporal Lobe
hearing, language, memory
Occipital Lobe
Vision
Cerebellum
coordination, balance
Brainstem
Vital functions (breathing, heart rate)
fMRI (Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging)
Measuring brain activity by detecting blood flow
PET (Positron Emission Tomography)
Shows metabolic activity in the brain
EEG(Electroencephalogram)
Records electrical activity of neurons
Lesion Studies
Examining brain-damaged patients to see effects on behavior.
Holzel et al.
Aim- Participation in mindfulness program to identify changes in specific brain regions, by comparing gray matter concentration before and after mindfulness courses. Both experimental and control participants underwent MRI scans before and after the 8 weeks. Voxel- based morphometry analysis was used to detect gray matter changes in specific regions of interest (hippocampus, amygdala, insula) and across the whole brain. Statistical analysis compared pre-post changes between groups.
Experimental group showed significant increase in gray matter
No strong correlation between time spent on homework and gray matter growth
Holzel ethics
Informed consent
Minimal risk since MRI’s are non invasive
Right to withdraw respected
No deception used
Confidentiality maintained
Holzel et al. strengths
Objective, scientific measurement using MRI
Longitudinal design supports cause effect relationship
Control group for comparison
Holzel et al. weaknesses
Small sample size- limited generalizability
no active control- could be placebo or social effects
Changes not directly linked to behavioral improvements
The Information Processing Model
Input: information received from the environment through senses
Processing: brain interprets and organizes the data
Output: behavior or decision based on processed information
Input
-sensory input is the foundation of perception and attention
it also helps explain individual differences
selective attention determines what we focus on
Processing
Information is encoded, analyzed, and stored
Includes thinking, language, problem solving, and decision making
Models like the multi-store model and working memory model help explain this stage
Output
The result of cognitive processing-actions, words, or decisions
cognitive approach strengths
Uses scientific methods
Explains internal thought processes clearly
cognitive approach weaknesses
May ignore emotions or social context
Treats humans like computers
Andrade
Aim: To test whether doodling aids concentration during a boring task
Participants listened to a dull phone message. The doodling group shaded shapes on a piece of paper while listening, and the control group just wrote names mentioned during the phone message. After the recording participants were asked to recall the names mentioned and places mentioned.
Doodling participants recalled 7.5 names on average and the control group recalled 5.8
Doodling group also performed slightly better on place recall
Concluded that doodling helps maintain attention and improves memory recall
Andrade strengths
Laboratory control reduced extraneous variables.
Operationalized variables (names, places recalled) makes replication easy.
Quantitative data allows objective comparison.
Andrade weaknesses
Artificial setting lacks ecological validity
Sample may not be representative
Doodling task was not natural may not reflect real world behavior
Theory of Mind
The ability to recognize and understand that other people have thoughts, beliefs, desires, and emotions that may differ from one’s own.
Baron Cohen
Aim- To test whether adults with Autism or Asperger Syndrome would have deficits in TOM compared to control groups
Group 1: 15 males with Autism or AS
Group 2: 122 normal adults
Group 3: 103 students from Cambridge
Group 4: 14 randomly selected IQ matched participants
Participants chose one of four emotions to describe a pair of eyes
Autism or AS group scored significantly lower than control groups
Females scored slightly higher than male control groups
Adults with autism or AS have a deficit in TOM
Baron Cohen strengths
Controlled experimental design increasing internal validity
Standardized procedure
Use of revised test improved reliability and ecological validity
Large and diverse control groups
Baron Cohen weaknesses
Artificial testing environment reduces ecological validity
Forced-choice format may over simplify complex emotions
Gender imbalance in AS and autistic group (all male) limits generalization
Lacks qualitative insight into participants reasoning
Baron Cohen ethics
Participants gave informed consent and were not deceived
No physical or psychological harm reported
Confidentiality was maintained
Participants with autism or AS may have experienced minor discomfort due to social cognitive testing.
Pozzulo et al
Aim: To examine whether different lineup procedures affect the accuracy of eyewitness identification among children and adults
Participants watched a short video of a stages dialy task. After a short delay, they viewed a lineup (sequentially OR simultaneously). They were asked to identify the individual from the video or if the person was absent from the lineup. Accuracy was recorded. The results were compared between age groups and lineup conditions.
Adults were generally more accurate in identifying the suspect then children
Sequential lineups produced slightly higher accuracy than simultaneous lineups.
Both groups showed reduced accuracy when the target was absent
Confidence levels did not always correlate with accuracy
Pozzulo et al strengths
Controlled experimental design allowed for clear comparison between lineup types
Practical applications in improving police procedures
Inclusion of both children and adults increased generalizability
Pozzulo et al weaknesses
Labrotory setting may lack ecological validity
Artificial nature of the mock crime may not evoke real emotional responses
Volunteer sample may not represent the general population
Pozzulo et al ethics
Informed consent obtained from all
No deception
Debriefed after
Protection from psychological harm
Encoding
Transforming sensory input into memory
Storage
Retaining information over time
Retrieval
Accessing stored information
Schemas
Mental frameworks that guide interpretation and memory
Selective attention
Focusing on certain stimuli while ignoring others
Divided attention
Performing multiple tasks at once
Cognitive load
Total mental effort; affects accuracy and memory
Classical conditioning
Learning through association between a neutral stimulus and unconditioned stimulus (bell-salvation-food)
Applications of Evaluative Learning
Advertising- pairing products with positive imaging
Phobias- Explains how irrational fears develop through association
Therapy- Counterconditioning used in systematic desensitization
Attitude formation and change
Saavedra and Silverman
Aim: To investigate the role of classical conditioning in relation to a specific phobia of buttons
Procedure 1: Used a hierarchy of fear from least to most distressing buttons. Exposure sessions gradually presented the boy with buttons, and had him rate his distress from a scale of 0-8. Despite increased exposure, fear levels sometimes rose, suggesting deeper emotional assosiations.
Procedure 2: Imagery exposure was used to address disgust rather then fear. The boy imagined situations involving buttons and described physical/ emotional reactions.
Saavedra and Silverman strengths
Detailed qualitative data
effective treatment method demonstrates real world application
Saavedra and Silverman weakness
Single participant gives low generalizability
Subjective self report data
Demand characteristics could influence responses
Saavedra and Silverman ethics
Informed consent from both boy and mother
Psychological distress was minimal
Study provided therapeutic benefit reducing long term distress
Confidentiality maintained
The Learning approach
Focuses on how behavior is learned from the environment
emphasizes nurture over nature
Based on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts
Learning occurs through association reinforcement and observation
Main types: Classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and social learning theory
Bandura et al.
Aim- To investigate whether children would imitate aggressive behavior shown by an adult model
Modeling phase: Children observe adult model in playroom being aggressive (or not)
Aggressive model hit Bobo doll, used a hammer, and shouted phrases like Pow!
Non aggressive model quietly played with toys
Control condition- child has no model to observe
Observation Phase: Child observed in new room with aggressive and non agressive toys
Behavior recorded for 20 min
Children exposed to aggressive model showed significantly more imitative aggression
Boys showed more physical aggression; girls showed more verbal aggression when observing female models
Greater imitation of same sex models
Control and non aggressive groups showed very little aggression
Bandura et al. strengths
High control of variables
Standardized procedures allowed replication. Provided empirical evidence for SLT
Useful applications in understanding media influence and child behavior modeling
Bandura et al. weakness
Low ecological validity
Potential demand characteristics
Ethnocentric- all participants are from the same nursery which limits generalizability
Ethical: Exposes children to aggression
Bandura et al. ethics
Informed consent from parents
No long term debriefing
Potential psychological harm
Raises concern about modeling agression
Operant Conditioning
Positive reinforcement: Add pleasant behavior
Negative reinforcement: Remove unpleasant behavior
Extinction: Behavior decreases when reinforcement stops
Primary Reinforcer
Biological influence (food, water, etc)
Secondary Reinforcer
Associated influence with primary reinforcer (whistle, clap, bell)
Behavior chaining
Separate behaviors to be pieced together over time to create a functional sequence
Behavioral steps for experimentation
Capture- Awaiting natural response to provide reward
Lure- non- natural behaviors (what we want to see) and ensure reward
Shaping- Incremental steps for wanted behavior over time behavioral steps for experimentation
Fagen et al
Aim- To investigate how elephants learn and modify behavior through reinforcment
Trainers introduced specific task - voluntary trunk wash
Elephants rewarded with food/praise for correct responses- training=secondary positive reinforcement
Shaping used to reinforce steps towards full behavior
Observations recorded frequency and accuracy
Changes tracked across sessions
Elephants learned new behaviors through reinforcement
Learned behaviors were retained over time
Generalization observed- applying learned tasks in new contexts
Positive reinforcement most effective
Findings aligned with operant conditioning principles
Fagen et al strengths
Naturalistic setting gives high ecological validity
Rich qualitative and quantitative data
Practical applications for animal welfare/ training
Extends learning theory beyond small animals
Fagen et al weaknesses
Small sample size limits generalizability
Possible observer bias
Limited control over extraneous variables
Ethical concerns in captive contexts
Fagen et al ethics
No harm caused
Captivity raises welfare questions
No inform consent (they are animals)
Animal care standards maintained
Ethical balance between welfare and research value