New Media Challenges Lecture 7: Information processing and credibility

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/24

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering information processing and credibility in the age of the internet, based on lecture notes.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

25 Terms

1
New cards

Trained attention hypothesis (Courage et al., 2015)

Frequent media multitasking positively affects cognitive control via training and improvement of control processes, promoting mental flexibility until late adolescence.

2
New cards

Media-Multitasking and Age

Higher levels of media-multitasking are associated with better multitasking performance (lower costs) only for individuals aged 7 to 29 due to neural plasticity in brain development.

3
New cards

Effects of In-Class Multitasking

In-class multitasking leads to lower academic performance with texting reducing test scores by 10-30% and laptop multitasking resulting in poorer note-taking, comprehension, and recall.

4
New cards

Consequences of Laptop Multitasking for Others

Laptop multitasking can hinder class learning for both users and nearby peers, causing distractions and lower scores for those in direct view of a multitasking peer.

5
New cards

Focus of Lecture 7

Individuals assess the credibility of information.

6
New cards

Challenges for Credibility Evaluations (Metzger & Flanagin, 2013)

The amount of information is infinite, online information may be less filtered, it may lack authority indicators, there are few quality control standards, content types are conflated, there is a context deficit leading to source confusion, and there are many targets for credibility evaluation.

7
New cards

Disintermediation

The removal of traditional intermediaries in online information, requiring individuals to evaluate credibility on their own.

8
New cards

Ethos

Character of the speaker.

9
New cards

Pathos

Emotional appeal.

10
New cards

Logos

Logical reasoning.

11
New cards

Credibility

Traditionally defined as the believability of information, based on the trustworthiness and expertise of the information source.

12
New cards

Cognitive Heuristics

Information processing strategies that ignore information to make decisions more quickly and with less effort, reducing cognitive load.

13
New cards

Reputation Heuristic

When having to believe between sources, people are more likely to believe the familiar source over an unfamiliar one.

14
New cards

Endorsement Heuristic

When having to believe sources, people are more likely to believe a source that is also trusted by others.

15
New cards

Consistency Heuristic

Check to what extent information is consistent over various sources.

16
New cards

Self-Confirmation Heuristic

People perceive information as credible when it is in line with pre-existing beliefs.

17
New cards

Expectancy Violation Heuristic

People are more likely to judge a website as not credible when it asks for unexpected information or has a sloppy layout.

18
New cards

Persuasive Intent Heuristic

Information that seems to have a persuasive or commercial motive is often viewed with scepticism.

19
New cards

System 1

Fast, automatic, intuitive cognitive system.

20
New cards

System 2

Slower, deliberate, analytical cognitive system.

21
New cards

Limited Capacity Model (Lang, 2000)

People have a limited capacity for the cognitive processing of information which they use for decoding, storage, and retrieval.

22
New cards

Heuristic-Systematic Model (Chaiken, 1980)

Systematic processing involves deeply considering a wider range of cues, while heuristic processing relies on a faster examination of credibility.

23
New cards

Prominence-Interpretation Theory (Fogg, 2003)

Iterative process of noticing a cue (prominence) and making a judgment about a cue (interpretation) until satisfied or constrained.

24
New cards

Elaboration Likelihood Model (Petty & Cacioppo, 1981)

Central vs Peripheral route of processing, based on motivation and ability.

25
New cards

Key Assumptions of Dual Processing Model (Metzger & Flanagin, 2015)

People do not evaluate all online information equally, different credibility cues trigger different levels of processing, and online environments introduce unique challenges.