should Lincolnshire reservoir go ahead?

Intro

I believe the development should go ahead because the benefits outweigh the costs.

What are your two points for the development?

• yes because it will help meet future water demands.

• It will bring economic benefits to the area.

Give your one point against

• it shouldnt go ahead because it will displace many people.

Paragraph 1

The development should go ahead because it will help meet future _____ demands. Figure one shows that around ___,000 new _____ are expected to be built in the region between 2025 and ____. More people _____ in the area means the water _________ will increase. Without additional water storage, there may not be enough water available during periods of _____. The _______ will store the water when supplies are high and release it when demands _______. Therefore, reservoir is an important ____-term solution and the benefits of a secure water supply _______ some of the __________ costs.

Water, 175, homes, 2030, living, demands, drought, resevoir, increase, long, outweighs, environmental

Paragraph 2

It should go ahead because it will bring _______ benefits to the local ____. FIGURE _ shows that the project of the generate ___ billion of direct and ______ investment. This additional income could ______ local infrastructure and ______, such as transport links and _____ facilities- creating benefits for both residents and __________. as a result _____ of life in the area may increase. Therefore, the economic benefits provide provide a _____ reason for the reservoir to be built.

Economic, area, 3, 2.6, indirect, improve, services, public, businesses, quality, strong

Paragraph 3 against

Alternatively, some _____ that it shouldn’t go ahead because it will ______ many people. In figure _ , it states that over __ families may lose their homes. Forcing residents to ____ may cause stress and ________ to their lives. They could lose access to established _____ networks local _______ and community ____.although the number of people affected as very ___ the impact on those individuals is likely to be very long _______, making this a strong reason as to why the proposed resevoir shouldn’t go ahead.

Argue, displace, 3, 50, relocate, disruption, social, services, ties, low, lasting