1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Aim
To investigate whether structural changes in the brain would occur in response to practicing a simple juggling routine
Method
A mixed design method, where participants volunteered to take part and using a random sampling design they were allocated into 1 of the two groups. All participants had no juggling experience prior
Procedure
Participants were randomly divided into two groups, jugglers and non-jugglers. The jugglers group spent 3 months learning a classic juggling routine with 3 balls, then followed another 3 month period where the jugglers were asked to stop and not practice at all. Throughout the total of 6 months, the non-jugglers (control) never practiced juggling. Three MRI scans were conducted on both groups; one before the experiment, one after 3 months, and one after 6 months.
Results
The first MRI scans were conducted showed no differences in brain structure between the two groups. After 3-months of practice, the jugglers had significantly more grey matter in the mid-temporal area of the cortex in both hemispheres (area known for coordination of movement). After 6 months, the differences between the two groups decreased, although the jugglers had more grey matter in these areas than at the first MRI
Conclusion
Grey matter grows in the brain due to environmental demands (like learning a news skill) and shrinks in the absence of stimulation (lack of practice). This shows there is a cause and effect relationship between learning and brain structure
Suggestion in terms of neuroplasticity
Suggests that the brain adapts in response to environmental demands
Strengths
strong biological evidence, before/after making effect clear
Same participants scanned before/during/after → controls for individual differences → internal validity increases
MRI brain scans → scientific, reliable, not based on self report
Longitudinal → shows not just change but the reversal
Limitations
small sample size (24) → limits generalisability
Low ecological validity; juggling is very specific task → brain changes might be different for more general skills (eg. Language, emotions)
Increase in grey matter, but what changed biologically?
Relatively short term period → no long-term permanence of brain changes shown