1/46
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Interpersonal attraction
Phenomenon of individuals liking each other
Influenced by many factors:
Physical characteristics
Similarity
Self-disclosure
Reciprocity
Proximity
Attraction - physical characteristics
Outward appearance
Golden ratio
Humans attracted to individuals with certain body proportions
Attraction - similarity
Tend to be attracted to people more similar to us
Most likely due to convenience
People are also drawn to people who have their values and validate their choices
Attraction - self-disclosure
Sharing one’s fears, thoughts, and goals with another person and being met with nonjudgmental empathy
Deepens attraction and friendship
Must be a reciprocal behavior
Sense of vulnerability
Attraction - reciprocal liking
Phenomenon where people like others better when they believe the other person likes them
Attraction - proximity
Physically being close to someone
Convenience
Easier to communicate
Mere exposure effect/familiarity effect
Tendency for people to prefer stimuli they are exposed to most frequently
Aggression
Behavior that tends to cause harm or increase social dominance
Physical actions, verbal/nonverbal communication
Threat displays common in both animals and humans
Doesn’t always lead to violence due to withdrawal
Aggression (causes/benefits)
Evolutionarily offers protection against perceived and real threats
Helps fight off predators
Helps organisms gain access to more resources
Food, additional territory, mates
Can also be the deciding factor for passing on genes (in cases with limited resources)
Aggression in the brain
Amygdala
Responsible for associating stimuli and their corresponding rewards or punishments→ tells us whether or not something is a threat
When activated, increases aggression
Prefrontal cortex
Higher-order brain structure that can hit the brakes on a revved-up amygdala
Reduces emotional reactivity and impulsiveness
Reduced activity linked to increased aggressive behavior
Aggression and hormones
Aggression under hormonal control
Higher levels of testosterone linked to more aggressive behavior
Not gender/sex specific
Some do speculate that higher levels of testosterone in phenotypical males can explain the trend that males are more aggressive → disproportionately commit more crimes
Cognitive neoassociation model
Negative emotions heighten our aggressive responses
Ex: snapping more when tired, sick, frustrated, or in pain
Riots more likely to happen on hot days than cool ones
Aggression and exposure
Exposure to violent behavior increases aggression
Albert Bandura’s bobo doll experiment
Attachment
Emotional bond between caregiver and child that begins to develop during infancy
Parental figures most common
Can occur with anyone sensitive and responsive during social interactions
Studies started after WWII with orphaned children
John Bowlby — negative effects of isolation
Mary Ainsworth — infants need a secure base in the form of a consistent caregiver (first 6 mo→2 yrs)
Secure attachment
Consistent caregiver (CG)
Child able to go out and explore → knows there’s a secure base to return to
Upset at CG’s departure; comforted by the CG’s return
Trusts the CG will be there for comfort
Stranger can comfort but child will prefer CG
Vital aspect of child’s social development
Insecure attachment
Other attachment styles — deficits in social skills
Avoidant
Ambivalent
Disorganized
Avoidant attachment
CG has little or no response to a distressed child
Child shows no preference between stranger and CG
Little or no distress when CG leaves; little or no relief when CG returns
Ambivalent attachment
CG has an inconsistent response to a child’s distress
Sometimes has appropriate response; sometimes responds neglectfully
Child cannot rely on CG’s response → cannot form a secure base
Child expresses distress when CG leaves but has a mixed response at their return
AKA anxious-ambivalent attachment
Disorganized attachment
No clear pattern of behavior in response to CG’s absence or presence
Avoidance/resistance
Dazed, frozen, confused
Repetitive behaviors like rocking
Associated with erratic behavior and social withdrawal
May be a red flag for abuse
Social support
Perception or reality that one is cared for by a social network
Can be:
Emotional
Esteem
Material
Informational
Network
Emotional support
Listening, affirming, empathizing with someone’s feelings
Ex: “I’m sorry for your loss” condolence
Esteem support
Affirming the qualities and skills of a person
Boosting one’s confidence by reminding them of their skills
Ex: “You’ll have no problem making up the work!”
Material support
AKA tangible support
Any type of financial or material contribution to another person
Ex: making a meal for friends after losing a loved one
Informational support
Providing information that will help someone
Ex: doctor providing informational support to patients; explain their diagnoses, potential treatment options, and risks and benefits of those options
Network support
Gives a person a sense of belonging
Ex: group hug; group activities; shared experiences
Benefits of social support
Reduced psychological distress such as anxiety and depression
Those with low support:
Higher levels of major mental health disorders, alcohol and drug use, suicide ideation
Higher mortality risk from different diseases
More likely to get colds and recover slower
Foraging
Seeking out and eating food
Biological influence
Hunger → hypothalamus
Lateral promotes hunger
Ventromedial promotes satiety
Genetics
Some species forage together; others engage in solitary foraging
Psychological influence
Learned behavior — learn through observation
Spatial awareness, memory, decision making
Social influence
Animals learn to hunt by watching others
Wolves hunt in packs with strict rules regarding order
Mating system
Organization of a group’s sexual behavior
Monogamy
Exclusive mating relationship
Polygamy
Exclusive relationships with many partners
Polygyny/polyandry
Polygyny — exclusive relationships with many females
Polyandry — exclusive relationships with many males
Promiscuity
A member of one sex mating with others without exclusivity
Humans and mating
More flexibility in our systems than other species
Influenced by both biological and social factors
Formal relationships correspond with mate choice
Mating may or not be associated with social relationships
Mate choice
AKA intersexual selection
Selection of mate based on attraction
Mate bias
How choosy members of the species are while choosing a mate
Evolutionary mechanism aimed at increasing the fitness of the species
Direct benefits — provides material advantages, protection, emotional support
Indirect benefits — promotes better survival in offspring
Phenotypic benefits
Observable traits that make a potential mate more attractive to the opposite sex
Usually indicate increased production and survival of offspring
Ex: males that appear more nurturing→ promote survival of offpsring
Sensory bias
Development of a trait to match a preexisting preference that exists in the population
Ex: male fiddler crabs build pillars around their territories to attract mates because these crabs see uneven horizons as a source of food
Fisherian/runaway selection
Positive feedback mechanism in which a particular trait that has no effect or a negative effect on survival becomes more and more exaggerated over time
Trait deemed sexually desirable → passed on
Increase in attractiveness of trait, therefore more likely to be passed on
Ex: bright plumage of a peacock
Indicator traits
Traits that signify overall good health and well-being of an organism, increasing its attractiveness to mates
May or may not be genetic in nature
Ex: female cats attracted to shiny coats of males
Dull coats could be genetic or could be a sign of malnutrition/infection
Genetic compatibility
Creation of mate pairs that, when combined, have complementary genetics
Provides a mechanism for the reduced frequency of recessive genetic disorders in the population
Reduces probability of offspring being homozygotic for disease-carrying allele
Altruism
Form of helping someone to benefit them at some cost to oneself
Can be motivated by selflessness, but can also be motivated by egoism or ulterior motives (public recognition)
Empathy
Ability to vicariously experience the emotions of another
Can influence helping behavior
Empathy-altruism hypothesis
One explanation for the relationship between empathy and helping behavior
One individual helps another when feeling empathy for them, regardless of the cost
Heavily debated theory — conceptions that some will only help when the benefits outweigh the costs
Game theory
Attempts to explain decision-making behavior
Evolutionary stable strategy
When adopted by a given population in a specific environment, natural selection will prevent alternative strategies from arising
Strategies are inherited traits passed along with the population, with the object of the game being becoming more fit than competitors
Hawk-Dove game
Access to shared food resources
Hawk is a fighter; dove will avoid fighting to share food
Hawk/hawk = one wins and one loses
Hawk/dove=hawk will win
Dove/dove=neither fights and they share the food
Equilibrium point where hawk/dove strategies can coexist as evolutionary stable strategies
Represents pure competition between individuals
Strategic four alternatives
Altruism
Donor provides a benefit to the recipient at a cost to the donor
Cooperation
Both donor and recipient benefit by working together
Spite
Both donor and recipient negatively impacted
Selfishness
Donor benefits while recipient negatively impacted
Inclusive fitness
Measure of an organism’s success in the population
Based on number of offspring, success in supporting offspring, and ability of offspring to then support others
Ex: sacrificing self to protect offspring→ ensure passing of genes to future generations
Promotes the idea that altruistic behavior can improve the fitness and success of a species