1/79
3/4 psych kss and research methods and other stuff i dont really know
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
hypothesis (IPAD)
independent variable
population
actual prediction (direction)
dependent variable
conclusion
controlled variable
kept constant in order to remove its potential effects on the DV
evaluation of experimental research
(+) identify cause and effect relationships
(+) control over variables
(-) time consuming
(-) ethical concerns
evaluating between-subjects design
(+) no order effects
(-) less control over participant variables
evaluating within-subjects design
(+) control participant differences
(-) order effects
evaluating mixed design
(+) fewer participants
(-) participant attrition
literature review
analytical summary of existing research on a specific topic
other research methodologies
correlational study
self reports
observational studies
case studies
simulation studies
correlational study
investigating the relationship between variables without manipulation (+1.00, -.100, 0)
evaluating correlational studies
(+) can be conducted outside a lab
correlation doest equal causation
evaluating self reports
(+) allows for anonimity
(-) relies on accurate answers
observational studies
observing natural environment to determine conncetions
evaluating observational studies
(+) encaputres natual behaviour
(-) observor bias
evaluating case studies
(+) investigate impractical situations
(-) difficult to replicate
sampling methods
convenience
random
statified
evaluating convenience sampling
(+) less time consuming
(-) sample may not be representative of population
evaluating random sampling
(+) highly representative sample (generalisable)
(-) time consuming as it requires accessible list of target population
evaluating stratified sampling
(+) allows for comparison between specific subgroups in a population
(-) accessible population list
extraneous variable
a variable other than the IV that may unintentionally effect the DV
confounding variable
a variable that affects the DV and therefore cannot be seperated from the effect of the IV
other extranoeus/confounding variables
participant variables
order effects
placebo effect
experimenter effects
situational variables
demand characteristics
order effects
participant responses infleunced by the order in which one experiences procedures
e.g participants remember list B more bc it was presented most recently (in within subjects)
placebo effect
change in participant behaviour due to the belief they are receiving treatment
experimenter effects
influence of experimenter on the results
situational variables
external factors associated with the setting that may influence responses
demand characteristics
cues that may influence responses
minimising extraneous and confounding variables
counterbalancing
single, double and triple blind procedures
placebos
standardised instructions and prodcedures
counterbalancing
change in the order of conditiopns to prevent order effects
single blind procedures
only participants are unaware of which group they are in
double blind procedure
participants and researchers are unaware of which group they are in (minimises demand characteristics)
placebo
fake treatment provided to establish whether influence is accurate or just beliefs
standardised instructions and procedures
ensuring all participants receive same info and processes (minimise situational variables)
true value
exact value that would be obtained if the experiment was done perfectly
accuracy
how close the measurement is to the true value
precision
how cloesly a set of measurement values agree with eachother
example of precision vs accuracy
Example:
If you’re measuring the mass of a 100 g weight:
Measurements of 99.8 g, 100.1 g, and 100.0 g → accurate and precise (close to true value and consistent).
Measurements of 90.2 g, 90.3 g, and 90.1 g → precise but not accurate (consistent but far from true value).
Measurements of 85 g, 95 g, and 110 g → neither accurate nor precise (scattered and incorrect).
reliability
overall consistency of a measurement / measurement tool
repeatability
would the invesrtigation obtain similar results if conducted under the same conditions (high repeatability = high precision, vice versa)
reproducibility
closeness of results when an investigation is replicated under changed conditions
internal validity
the extent to which an investigation actually investigated what it set out to investigate
if anything other than the IV can explain results = low internal validity
external validity
are the results generalisable to population
smaller sample size = low EV
random error
chance variation in measurement process (unknown/uncotnrolled factors interfere)
systematic error
flaw in research design
ethical concepts (BINJR)
beneficience
intergrity
non-maleficence
justice
respect
beneficience
commitment to maximising benefits and minimising risks and harm in experiment
integrity
commitment to search for knowledge
honest reporting of all sources of information and results
non-maleficence
avoid causing harm
in the case where the research investigation may involve some degree of harm, the harm should not be disproportionate to the benefits
justice
making decisions that are fair, balanced, and equitable, so no one is unfairly harmed and everyone has access to benefits.
respect
valuing the rights, choices, and well-being of living things, and treating them fairly, whether they can make decisions or not.
ethical guidelines (Very Inspiring Women Dont Drink Coffee)
Voluntary participation
Informed consent
Withdrawal rights
Deception
Debriefing
Confidentiality
Voluntary participation
participanmts must freely choose to involved without coercion
Informed consent
understand nature and purpose of study incl risks before agreeing
obtain written consent by participants or parents/guardians if participants are unable to
Withdrawal rights
able to discontinue involvement at any time
Deception
only permission if knowing true purpose can affect behaviour and therefore validity
benefits of deception should justify its use
Debriefing
participants understand aim, results and conclusion at the conclusion of experiment
address any questions
provide support to prevent long lasting harm
Confidentiality
protecting privacy of participants personal information
anonymity in individual results
explanatory power of GAS model
evidence of relationship b/w stress and illness
does not consider psychological responses to stresss
explanatory power of TMSC
accounts for individual differences
overlooks physiological response to stress
explanatory power of multistore model
outlines memory as a simple lienar process through its 3 distinct stores
doesnt explain why some memories still go to ltm without rehearsal
outline sewb
multidimensional and holistic frameowkr that describes the phsyical, social, emotional, spiritual and cultural wellbeing of a person by encapusalting all elements of being
domains of sewb (BB CCC SA FK ME)
body and behaviours
culture
country
community
spirit and ancestry
family and kinship
mind and emotions
body and behaviours
connection to physical body and health to be able to participate in all aspects of life
country
traditional lands of ATSI peoples including the physical land itself and the spiritual, emotional and cultural connections within it
culture
connection to idrtntiy and heritage including knowledge systems, cultural traditions and practices.
community
connection to a multimodal communal space which provides opportunities for individuals and families to connect with eachother
family and kinship
relationship to immediate and wider family grouop - maintain interconnectedness through cultural ties and caring relationships
mind and emotions
Emphasises the individual’s personal experience of their mental wellbeing (or mental ill-health) and their ability to manage thoughts and feelings
sprirtuality and ancestors
interconnection between Country, human and non-human beings, as well as the past, present and future.
affective effects
increased irritability
reduced empathy
cognitive effects
reduced alertness
impaired memory
behaviour
microsleeps
reduced task efficiency
role of hippocampus
encoding and retrieval of explicit memories (consolidation)
role of neocortex
stores explicit memories
reconstruction of memories from different regions to create a single cohesive memory
role of amygdala
work w/ hippocampus to attach emotional singificane to memory (release of adrenaline)
formation and storage of classically conditioned fear responses
role of cerebellum
encoding procedural memories related to motor skills
storage of classically conditioned reflexes
role of basal ganglia
encoding and sotrage of procedural memory related to habits
dopamine
pleasure and motivation(excit and inhib)
serotonin
mood (inhib)
atsi ways of knowing
story sharing
learning maps
non verbal
non linear
land links
community links