The Cold War: Space Race

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/13

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

14 Terms

1
New cards

Cold War Context

-U.S. vs. USSR rivalry after WWII

-Competition for global influence, military power, technological prestige

-Space seen as symbol of national strength and ideological superiority

-Rocket technology linked to nuclear missile capability

-Public fear of “falling behind” drives urgency

2
New cards

Sputnik (1957)

-USSR launches Sputnik → first artificial satellite

-Major psychological shock in U.S. (“Sputnik panic”)

-Signals Soviet lead in rockets/ICBMs

-Concerns about surveillance, national security

3
New cards

Sputnik (1957): U.S. responses

-Creation of NASA (1958)

-National Defense Education Act → boosts math, science, engineering education

-Increased funding for research and universities

-Growth of aerospace and defense industries

4
New cards

Soviet Firsts

-Sputnik 2 → first animal in orbit (Laika)

-Yuri Gagarin (1961) → first human in space, first orbital flight

-Demonstrated Soviet mastery of early human spaceflight

5
New cards

American Program: Mercury

-Goal: Put a human in space, test basic spaceflight

-Alan Shepard (1961) → first American in space (suborbital)

-John Glenn (1962) → first American to orbit Earth

-Mercury missions increase U.S. confidence but show initial lag behind USSR

6
New cards

Kennedy’s Moon Goal

-Cold War prestige vital after early Soviet victories

-JFK sets national challenge (1961): land humans on the moon before 1970

-Emphasizes unity, national purpose, and scientific leadership

-Justifies program as essential to beating Soviet communism

-Leads to massive expansion of NASA budget and workforce

-Public support mixed due to high cost but increases over time

7
New cards

Gemini Program (1965–1966)

-Intermediate step between Mercury and Apollo

-Goals: spacewalks, long-duration flights, docking maneuvers

-Essential for learning how to manage complex lunar missions

-Demonstrates U.S. catching up and surpassing USSR in some areas by mid-1960s

8
New cards

Apollo Program: Purpose & Preparation

-Long-term objective: crewed lunar landing

-Required new spacecraft, Saturn V rockets, navigation systems

-Massive engineering effort (hundreds of thousands of workers)

9
New cards

Apollo Program: Key Missions

-Apollo 1 (1967) → cabin fire during ground test; three astronauts killed; major redesign and safety overhaul

-Apollo 8 (1968) → first human mission to orbit the Moon; iconic “Earthrise” photo

-Apollo 10 (1969) → full dress rehearsal for lunar landing

10
New cards

Apollo Program: Apollo 11 (1969) — Moon Landing

-Crew: Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, Michael Collins

-July 20, 1969 → first human lunar landing

-Armstrong walks on the surface; “one small step… one giant leap…”

-Global broadcast; major U.S. Cold War victory

11
New cards

Impact of the Space Race: National & Global Effects

-U.S. demonstrates technological and ideological superiority

-Boosts national morale after 1960s turmoil (Vietnam, civil rights conflicts)

-Strengthens U.S. global prestige during Cold War

12
New cards

Impact of the Space Race: Scientific & Technological Advances

-Computers, microchips, satellite communications

-Weather forecasting, GPS foundations

-Advances in medical imaging, materials science, engineering

13
New cards

Impact of the Space Race: Education & Workforce

-Huge growth in STEM fields

-National push for math/science education

-Inspires generation of scientists and engineers

-Raises issues of access → limited opportunities for women and minorities (later highlighted in Hidden Figures)

14
New cards

Impact of the Space Race: Critiques & Debates

-Enormous cost → questions about spending priorities

-Civil rights activists note inequality in access to technology/education

-Some argue social problems should take precedence over space exploration

-But supporters emphasize long-term benefits and national security