1/67
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Viscoelasticity
domain of amorphous phase
Loading polymer
molecular rearrangement in amorphous phase (back stress)
Unloading polymer
polymer wants to recover and recoil (dependant on time and temperature)
Viso
flow of polymer chain
Elasticity
back stress
Creep strain
fully recoverable due to back stress
Creep test
constant load, measure resulting in strain
Unrelaxed creep compliance
not enough time for motion
Relaxed creep compliance
all mechanisms already occurred
J-value
underestimate, constant for given load (not dependant on stress)
Linear viscoelastic creep
as temp increases relaxation increases at shorter time scales
Dissipation
caused by internal friction, low temp, low free volume, no dissipation
Temp and modulus
shift curves left and right
Stress relaxation molecules
constant stress loading and constant strain. No change in dimension/volume change internal stresses holding molecules together change over time
Higher strains
larger stress decay (non linear)
Relaxation modulus
over time (Accelerated with temp) less stiff, more mobile, less stress
Loading rate
increased shear rate, increased mechanical behaviour,
Long term polymer loading
not much initial creep strain, jump at start due to Eleatic response or rapid creep
Stress relaxation
given strain applied to polymer and the resulting decrease in stress (load) I measured as the sample relates over time
Creep behaviour
set stress applied to the polymer and the resulting changes in strain are measures as a function of time
Isometric
constant strain
Isochronous
constant time
Amorphous behaviour
very stress, vary strain, strain partially reservable
Creep behaviour
instant elastic response -> rapid creep (fully recoverable) -> reptation, creep slows (irreversible flow)
Relaxation time
time polymer redistributed internal stresses through molecular motion under constant strain
Retardation time
time polymer redistributed internal strain through molecular notion under constant stress (creep)
Viscoelasticity depends on
material composition, structure, deformation rate, loading time temperature
Relaxation curve - viscoelasticity
characteristic retardation time – max change in gradient
Relaxation curve – rubber
plateaus, mobility mechanisms used up
Relaxation curve – flow
non reversable reptation
Increasing relaxation time
increases material viscosity
Theory of linear viscoelasticity
phenomenological, does not show molecular motion
Time constant – represents how long it takes for stress to relax (spectrum)
Maxwell model
good for relaxation, bad for creep
Kelvin/Voigt model
bad for relaxation, good for creep (no initial elastic jump)
Standard linear/Zenner model
spring in series with parallel spring and dashpot
Burgers model
spring and dashpot in series with parallel spring and dashpot
TTS requirements
thermorheologically simple (no shape change), no more than 1 molecular motion type, if multiple transitions, same shift factor.
Physical aging
occurs in amorphous phase, isothermal contractions below Tg, stiffens polymers as less free volume. Modulus increases
WLF equation
assumes free volume only cause of relaxation, limited to rubebry range
Properties over time
compliance increases, stiffness decreases
Long term loading
Arrhenius all temps, WLF in GT
Master curves
allow properties without doing long term experiments, use to get parameters for equations
Dynamic properties
frequency effects damping
Damping
conversion of energy heat via friction
Elastic properties
in phase with strain/stress
Viscous properties
out of phase with strain/stress. No energy stored so max stress and change in strain
Polymer properties
some shift between phase and stress
Tan delta
how much material behaves as a viscous and how much behaves as an elastic.
Tan delta close to zero
elastic material
Free vibration data collection
measure at natural frequency, no frequency control
Forced vibration data collection
control frequency so greater delta accuracy
Relaxation mechanism
initial due to side group beta transitions. Then Tg due to main chain alpha reptation
Past Tg
no internal friction, so flows easily, low damping
DMA relaxations
picks up modulus and changes it to tan delta
Temp increases
as frequency increases
Branching increases
tan delta, goes for lower Temp
High loading rate
shifts tan delta right (higher temp)
Strength and modulus dependencies
depends on tsep speed and temp
Close to Tg
rate of testing largest effect
Well below Tg
polymers behave elastically v=0.3
Above Tg
v =0.5
Tensile test
not simple as rate of deformation influences mechanical properties
Mechanical properties
higher strain rate, higher modulus, higher strengths
Hight temp/low strain rate
stress relaxation occurs during test (chains have enough time to rearange)
Low temp/high strain
stress relaxation does not occur (no time for chains to unravel)
Short term behaviour
tensile test lower than DMA, tacticity, basic stress strain
Design stress
Brittle use UTS, Tough yield use yield, Tough no yield use 0.5% offset yield