Torts

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/15

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Claims requiring proof that a defendant acted with a specific intention, desire to harm, or knowledge that harm was a substantial result

Last updated 6:34 PM on 9/13/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

16 Terms

1
New cards

Intentional Torts List

Assault, Battery, False Imprisonment, IIED

2
New cards

Negligence definition

claims requiring proof that defendant failed to exercise due care

3
New cards

Tort claims

Intentional torts, Negligence, Strict Liability

4
New cards

Strict liability

Claims that do not require proof of intention or lack of due care

5
New cards

Purpose Intent

D acts with the purpose of producing a consequence.

purpose to harm = intentional even if harm not substantially certain to occur

6
New cards

Knowledge Intent

knowing or believing that the consequence is substantially certain to result

7
New cards

Rest3d Torts-PEH §1

A person acts with the intent to produce a consequence if:

Person acts with the purpose of producing the consequence; OR

The person acts knowing that the consequence is substantially certain to result.

8
New cards

Disjunctive Test:

Explicitly separates purposeful harm from substantial certainty

9
New cards

Subjective Test:

What the particular Defendant in fact desired/believed

10
New cards

Intended contact occurs = intent to harm

If defendant acts with intent to cause contact, it doesn’t matter that probability of harm or offense is low.

11
New cards

Volitional act ≠ intentional act

D gets off bus, bumps into P

-deliberate act

-not act for purpose of causing harmful/offensive contact


D pushes P to get out of way

-intentional offensive contact

12
New cards

Dual intent:

Intent to contact plus intent to harm/offend
EX: Punching some one intentionally

13
New cards

Single intent:

Intent to contact
EX: Tapping someone to get their attention

14
New cards

How do you prove a defendants intent?

-Prove intent circumstantially:

-intent inferred from conduct

-Objective evidence to prove state of mind

-Defendant presumed to have intended natural and probable consequences

-Infer Defendant’s intent from knowledge

-Fact-finder has to determine defendant’s subjective state of mind based on objective external facts

15
New cards

Motive is ______ to issue of intent

irrelevant

16
New cards

Diminished Capacity

Children: may be liable for intentional torts even if incapable of negligence

Adults with diminished capacity:
Liable for intentional torts
Insanity may prevent specific kind of intent necessary for certain torts