1/15
Claims requiring proof that a defendant acted with a specific intention, desire to harm, or knowledge that harm was a substantial result
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Intentional Torts List
Assault, Battery, False Imprisonment, IIED
Negligence definition
claims requiring proof that defendant failed to exercise due care
Tort claims
Intentional torts, Negligence, Strict Liability
Strict liability
Claims that do not require proof of intention or lack of due care
Purpose Intent
D acts with the purpose of producing a consequence.
purpose to harm = intentional even if harm not substantially certain to occur
Knowledge Intent
knowing or believing that the consequence is substantially certain to result
Rest3d Torts-PEH §1
A person acts with the intent to produce a consequence if:
Person acts with the purpose of producing the consequence; OR
The person acts knowing that the consequence is substantially certain to result.
Disjunctive Test:
Explicitly separates purposeful harm from substantial certainty
Subjective Test:
What the particular Defendant in fact desired/believed
Intended contact occurs = intent to harm
If defendant acts with intent to cause contact, it doesn’t matter that probability of harm or offense is low.
Volitional act ≠ intentional act
D gets off bus, bumps into P
-deliberate act
-not act for purpose of causing harmful/offensive contact
D pushes P to get out of way
-intentional offensive contact
Dual intent:
Intent to contact plus intent to harm/offend
EX: Punching some one intentionally
Single intent:
Intent to contact
EX: Tapping someone to get their attention
How do you prove a defendants intent?
-Prove intent circumstantially:
-intent inferred from conduct
-Objective evidence to prove state of mind
-Defendant presumed to have intended natural and probable consequences
-Infer Defendant’s intent from knowledge
-Fact-finder has to determine defendant’s subjective state of mind based on objective external facts
Motive is ______ to issue of intent
irrelevant
Diminished Capacity
Children: may be liable for intentional torts even if incapable of negligence
Adults with diminished capacity:
Liable for intentional torts
Insanity may prevent specific kind of intent necessary for certain torts