1/42
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Plato's Apology
Genre: Philosophical defense speech (not a dialogue in the usual
sense)
Setting: Socrates' trial in 399 BCE (Before Common Era)
Main Characters: Socrates (speaking to the Athenian jury)
"Apology"
is Socrates' defense against charges of corrupting the youth and impiety (lack of respect).
he is not guilty
Socrates argues that _______________, but rather a social and moral gadfly sent by the gods.
elenchus (cross-examination)
He defends his method of _________________________ and claims wisdom lies in knowing one's own ignorance.
Plato & Protagoras
Genre: Philosophical dialogue
Setting: A conversation at the house of Callias in Athens
Main Characters: Socrates, Protagoras (a famous
sophist), and others
whether virtue can be taught.
In "Protagoras," Socrates debates the famous sophist Protagoras about
Protagoras
argues that virtue is teachable, giving long speeches about how society educates people in moral values.
Socrates
questions the unity of the virtues (e.g., is courage separate from wisdom?) and whether anyone knowingly does evil.
-Think
-Defend their views
-Account for what they know and do not know
Socrates philosophize in the public place (Agora), compelled people to
Socratic Method / Philosophical Reflection
He asked people series of questions, engaged them to answer
-Effective method of education.
-We are compelled to reflect on what we believe or claim to know.
-What we believe to be true becomes the basis of our action.
Socratic Method / Philosophical Reflection
Lao Tzu
Watch your THOUGHTS
They become WORDS
Watch your WORDS
They become ACTIONS
Watch your ACTIONS
They become HABITS
Watch your HABITS
They become CHARACTER
Watch your CHARACTER
It becomes your DESTINY
An examination of beliefs or thoughts
provides us with an opportunity to know ourselves better.
A philosophical reflection is ________________ because we do not realize what we truly believe until we are challenged to defend them.
indispensable
are related to their worldly possession, social/cultural standing and the level of acceptance.
The most common self-image identifications people make,
how we feel
Sometimes we define ourselves by
in response to the outcomes that we had at some points in our past.
Sometimes we define ourselves
➔ Define yourself in a positive way
➔ Let room for improvement and growth
➔ Define yourself through constants
➔ Raise your standards for becoming better
➔ Develop self-honesty, honesty will bring you clarity
➔ Admit we all are imperfect
➔ Be focused to improve yourself day by day
Few suggestions when defining who you are:
Aristotle
-Defined virtue as a mean between excess and deficiency, a balance of character traits and behaviors achieved through habit and rational choice.
-He believed virtues are developed through practice, leading to moral excellence and a fulfilling life.
Virtue
-Knowledge of good and bad.
-Is knowledge because to truly know what is good necessarily leads to actual doing of what is good.
Pilosopo
One with skill in evading / avoiding arguments.
logical fallacy
-is an argument that may sound convincing or true but is actually flawed.
-are lapses of logic that lead us to an unsupported conclusion.
Sophists
-A group of people in Greece who are teaching Arete excellence (poetry, science, mathematics)
-According to Plato & Aristotle, they use argument to win and not to find the truth
Protagoras
-Uses argument to appear the weak appear stronger.
-Man is the measure of all things.
-Every individual has a measure of his own truth.
Gorgias
Nomos (Law of Society) is opposed to Physis (Natural Order).
In nature (physis)
: The strong have power over the weak.
In society (nomos)
: Laws are created to protect the weak and restrain the strong.
Callicles
In natural order might makes right.
Callicles In Nature
the strong dominate the weak.
This is not "unjust" — it is simply the way reality works.
Callicles
-argued that laws (justice, equality, fairness) are inventions of the weak majority to protect themselves from the strong minority.
-For him, these laws go against nature because they restrict the natural superiority of the strong.
Lycophron
-Slavery is unjust in the law of nature.
-Societies create hierarchy not found in nature.
-Believed that all humans are naturally equal.
-No one is born a master or slave by nature
Protagoras
"On every issue, there are two arguments
opposed to one another."
Sophism
-A term used to describe a particular style of argumentation and reasoning that is often associated with deception and trickery.
-It is a type of rhetoric that aims to persuade rather than inform, and that it relies on clever wordplay and logical fallacies to make its point.
fallacy
-is a mistake in reasoning that makes an argument invalid or weak.
-It may sound persuasive, but it does not logically prove the point.
Ad Hominem
A fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the
argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.
Appeal to ignorance / Argumentum ad Ignorantiam.
It occurs when someone claims that something is true because it hasn't been proven false, or false because it hasn't been proven true.
Hasty Generalization
A fallacy in which conclusion is not logically supported by sufficient evidence.
Equivocation
An argument in an ambiguous way, with one meaning in
the other side of the argument and another meaning in the other portion of the argument, making the argument misleading. Shifting the meaning of a word mid-argument.
Appeal to Pity / Ad Misericordiam
A fallacy in which someone tries to win support an argument or idea by exploiting the opponent's feelings, pity or guilt.
Bandwagon
Occurs when a proposition is claimed to be true or good
solely because many people believe it to be so.
Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc (Superstitions)
This fallacy occurs when it is assumed that, because one thing happened after another, it must have occurred as a result of it.
Appeal to Force / Argumentum ad Baculum
When force, coercion, or even a threat of force is used in place of a reason in an attempt to justify a conclusion.
Pamimilosopo
-The true philosopher, observes, thinks and sees clearly with the mind, and speaks the truth.
-We need the pilosopo to engage others to see the truth and live by it.