ap seminar IWA oral defense

What information did you need before you began your research, and how did that information shape your research?

Some information I needed before I began my research included how many people in the USA where caregivers for individuals with chronic health issues and the issues they have because then only would I be able to understand how big this issue is and if it was that big of an issue to create a research question out of.

What evidence did you gather that you didn’t use? Why did you choose not to use it?

I gathered lots of statistics and evidence from studies in different universities that were relevant to my topic however I ultimately chose not to use it because it didn’t specficicaly relate to caregivers of family members with chronic health issues and instead it was broad as it was just on any caregivers.

How valid and reliable are the sources you used? How do you know? Which sources didn’t work?

In assesing the reliability of the sources I used, I made sure they were all from academic publications and credibile profesor at univeritys. For example my evidence for one of the claims is from a profesor of nursing at the university of michigan which is a well known institution. Sources that didn’t work included personal blogs and unverified online articles.

How did you select the strategies you used to gather information or conduct research? Were they effective?

I sslected my strategies based on the specific needs of my research question, focusing on academic databases and peer-reviewed articles to ensure credible information.I choose evidence from credibile profesors at well known instutions. For example the evidence from the profesor of nursing at he Universiy of michigan that I used to support one of my claims. Overall, these strategies proved effective as they allowed me to gather relevant and reliable data.

How did your research question evolve as you moved through the research process? Did your research go in a different direction than you originally planned/hypothesized?

As I continued my research process , my research question became more focused on the specific challenges faced by family caregivers for chronic illness patients. Initially, I aimed to study caregivers in general, but as I examined relevant literature and evidence, I realized the need to concentrate on this particular subset to address their unique experiences and needs.

What information did you need that you weren’t able to find or locate? How did you go about trying to find that information?

In my research, I struggled to find comprehensive data on the emotional impact of caregiving for chronic illness patients. I attempted to locate this information by exploring various academic journals and databases, but I found limited studies focusing specifically on this aspect. I had to specify my search more and utilize keywords related to emotional resilience and caregiver stress to improve my result and obtain more relevant findings.

How did you handle the differing perspectives in order to reach a conclusion?

I considered various viewpoints by analyzing differing research studies and expert opinions to gain a comprehensive understanding of the topic. By weighing the evidence from multiple sources, I was able to synthesize the insights and come to a well-rounded conclusion that acknowledged the complexities of the issue.

What additional questions emerged from your research? Why are these questions important?

Throughout my research, additional questions arose regarding the long-term effects of caregiving on mental health and the effectiveness of existing support systems. These questions are important because understanding these aspects can inform policy changes and improve resources for caregivers, ultimately enhancing their quality of life. 

What advice would you have for other researchers who consider this topic?

I would advise researchers to be thorough in their search for diverse sources and to remain open to evolving questions during their investigation. Building a network of experts and utilizing comprehensive databases can also enhance the depth of their research.

What might be the real-world implications or consequences (influence on others’ behaviors or decision-making processes) of your findings? What are the implications to your community?

The real-world implications of my findings may include influencing caregiver support policies and encouraging community awareness about mental health challenges faced by caregivers. This can lead to improved resources and better decision-making for both caregivers and policymakers.

If you had more time, what additional research would you conduct related to this issue?

I would conduct further research to explore specific intervention strategies for supporting caregivers, as well as investigate the impact of cultural factors on caregiving experiences. This additional research could provide valuable insights to create more tailored support programs.

Explain the level of certainty you have about your conclusion, solution, or recommendation.

I have a high level of certainty about my conclusion based on the extensive research and analysis conducted. The findings are supported by crdible sources and align with existing literature on the topic. It is also the most realistic solution based on the current evidence available.

How does your conclusion respond to any of the other research or sources you examined?

My conclusion integrates insights from various sources, highlighting common themes and divergences. This demonstrates how my findings contribute to the broader conversation surrounding caregiver support and mental health challenges.

How did you use the conclusions and questions of others to advance your own research?

I utilized the conclusions and questions of other researchers to identify gaps in existing literature, refine my research questions, and ensure my work builds upon established findings, thereby enhancing the overall argument and relevance of my study. This approach allowed me to contextualize my research within the ongoing discourse, ensuring that my contributions are significant.