Social Psychology

5.0(1)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/59

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 2:41 PM on 9/25/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

60 Terms

1
New cards

social psychology

Scientific study of the way in which people’s thoughts, feelings, and actions are influenced by the real or imagined presence of other people.

2
New cards

dueling proverbs

common sense gives us conflicting predictions.

Does “absence make the heart grow fonder” or is “out of sight, out of mind”?

3
New cards

hindsight bias

  • Outcomes seem obvious and easy to predict in retrospect

  • Makes findings of social psychology seem trite and banal

  • When judging the decisions of others, ___ ___ affects our evaluations of them

  • Examples:

    • Invasion of Iraq (WMDs)

    • Dylan Roof and the mass murder at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church


4
New cards

Ross and Samuels

Social psychologists study the power of the situation to influence behavior

  • Participants identified as competitive or cooperative by dorm RAs

  • Participants played a game labeled as either “Wall Street” or “Community”


5
New cards

Correspondence bias

We tend to overestimate the power of personality (internal factors) and underestimate the power of the situation (external factors) in determining the behavior of others (correspondence bias), resulting in erroneous internal attributions (FAE).

6
New cards

Construals

  • How people interpret, understand, and represent social situations determines affect, cognition, and behavior.

  • _____ are subjective and vary among individuals - social perception is a constructive process

  • _____ are influenced by 4 primary motives:

    • to be accurate

    • to feel good about ourselves

    • to achieve acceptance and approval of others

    • to reduce uncertainty and enhance perceptions of control.


7
New cards

self fulfilling prophecy

Rosenthal & Jacobsen (1968)

“Bloomers” vs. “Non-Bloomers”

  • Students identified as IQ Bloomer to teachers

  • Bloomers exhibited a 4 pt higher increase in IQ than Non-bloomers

  • Students not identified as bloomers but who showed IQ gains were less liked by teachers!


8
New cards

science vs common sense

  • objective, rigorous data collection

  • conclusions based on analysis of data

  • error can be corrected

vs

  • subjective, bias data collection

  • impressionistic conclusions

  • no corrective features - error persists


9
New cards

theory

a coherent set of related principles that explains observed phenomena

10
New cards

hypothesis

a specific falsifiable prediction derived from theory

11
New cards

internal validity

random assignment + control of extraneous variables

12
New cards

external validity

representative sample + psychological realism

13
New cards

High Internal Validity

“Bloomer” label assigned randomly + students/parents unaware of the label

14
New cards

High External Validity

Sample of varied ethnicity, ability etc. + Real classroom, real IQ tests

15
New cards

the factors that affect significance

  • magnitude of effect

  • variability in data

  • sample size


16
New cards

samples

  • we study ___, not population.

  • we draw inferences about populations using data obtained from samples.

  • therefore, any result can be due to chance alone.

  • it’s always a question of probability, never of certainty.


17
New cards

statistical significance

When the outcome is probably not due to chance.

18
New cards

practical significance

When the outcome is large enough to make a meaningful difference in real life.

19
New cards

advantages of correlational research

  • No manipulation or control of variables required

  • You can use “in vivo” data

  • Avoid many ethical and practical limitations


20
New cards

limitations of correlational research

  • cannot control or manipulate variables

  • no causal conclusions can be drawn

    • directionality problem

    • 3rd variable problem


21
New cards

human beings

  • “Cognitive Misers”

  • “Satisficers”

  • Users of limited resource capacity, confronted by often impoverished information, subject to a plethora of biases

  • “Meaning makers”


22
New cards

automatic social cognition

  • non-conscious

  • unintentional

  • involuntary

  • effortless

  • fast


23
New cards

controlled social cognition

  • conscious

  • intentional

  • voluntary

  • effortful

  • slow


24
New cards

schemas

Mental structures used to organize/process social information and experience

  • regulate attention

  • influence construals

  • guide memory reconstruction

Examples: scripts, categories, associations

most influential when information is ambiguous or resources are taxed.

25
New cards

chronic accessibility

schemmas so often activated that they are “always” available

26
New cards

schema accessibility

  • chronic accessibility

  • temporary accessibility

    • goal pursuit activates related schemas

    • can be activated by priming

      • supraliminal

      • subliminal

      • examples


27
New cards

supraliminal priming

A psychological process where an individual is exposed to a conscious, fully perceptible stimulus that subtly influences their subsequent thoughts, judgments, or behaviors.

  • Higgins, Rholes, & Jones (1977) had Ss memorize + or - words (e.g., reckless, foolhardy, OR adventurous, self- confident)

  • All Ss read the same description of Donald

  • Who was more likely to perceive Donald negatively? Who was more likely to perceive him positively?


28
New cards

subliminal priming

The presentation of a sensory stimulus below the absolute threshold of conscious awareness (the limen) that activates a mental representation and influences a subsequent behavioral, emotional, or cognitive response without the individual's conscious knowledge.

  • Bargh & Pietromonaco (1982) exposed Ss to hostile or neutral words for 1/20 sec.

  • All Ss read the same description of Donald

  • Who was more likely to perceive Donald as hostile?


29
New cards

illusory correlation

  • may be erroneous

  • examples:

    • “it always rains when I wash my car..”

    • “crazy things are mor elilely when the moon is full”

    • Tversky’s “myth of the hot hand”


30
New cards

perseverance effect

relatively resistant to disconfirmatory evidence

example:

  • Ross, Lepper, & Hubbard (1975): Ss were to guess which suicide notes were real

  • Ss rec’d false feedback: Success (24/25) or failure (10/25)

  • Ss were then informed feedback was false, then asked how many they believed they got right and how they would do on a new test.


31
New cards

Schema Perseverance

Other contributing factors

  • Confirmation bias

  • Sampling bias

  • Self-fulfilling prophecy

  • Culture & systems of shared beliefs


32
New cards

less likely

Priming Ss with the construct “politeness” made them ___ ___ to interrupt experimenter

33
New cards

slowly

Priming Ss with the social category “elderly” caused them to walk more ___

34
New cards

chameleon effect

Subject has the goal of affiliation!

  • Ss primed to affiliate supraliminal or subliminal exhibited greater behavioral mimicry than controls. (Chartrand & Lakin 2003)

  • Ostracized Ss engaged in more mimicry than controls who weren’t ostracized (Lakin et al., 2008)


35
New cards

heuristics

  • availability

  • representativeness

  • anchoring and adjustment


36
New cards

availability

Judgment of likelihood based on how easily examples are called to mind

37
New cards

representativeness

Judgment of likelihood based on how closely a particular instance matches “typical” case

38
New cards

anchoring and adjustment

Judgment influenced by an arbitrary, unrelated value used as an “anchor” from which insufficient adjustment is made.

39
New cards

controlled social cognition

  • Motivation + Resource Availability

  • Motivation can be varied by manipulating outcome dependency

  • Resource availability can be varied by manipulating speed, competing tasks, or fatigue


40
New cards

counterfactual thinking

  • Upward vs. Downward _____

    • A function of proximity to “cutoff”

    • Upward = Negative affect, but increased motivation

    • Downward = Positive affect, but no motivational enhancement


41
New cards

Social perception

the process by which we form impressions of and make inferences about other people.

  • a construcive process influenced by schemas.


42
New cards

nonverbal behavior

mostly automatic, and includes:

  • facial expressions

  • eye contact, gaze

  • extravocal cues (volume, pitch speed, inflection)

  • intentional gestures

  • body language (posture, orientation, distance, etc.)


43
New cards

deception

People can mask or exhibit emotions contrary to what they really feel.

44
New cards

six basic emotions

  • Fear

  • Anger

  • Surprise

  • Happiness

  • Disgust

  • Sadness

Universal and appear early in life.

45
New cards

display rules

Influences emotional expression; ___ ___ that are unique to each culture dictate when different nonverbal behaviors are appropriate to display.

46
New cards

display blends

Decoding < 100% accurate because people may ___ ___ of multiple affects simultaneously.

47
New cards

gender differences

Women are better than men at both decoding and encoding nonverbal behavior.

  • exception: anger


48
New cards

causal attribution

  • inferring the causes of outcomes (e.g., behaviors, performance, etc.)

  • Heider’s dichotomy for people’s explanations: internal (dispositional) attributions and external (situational) attributions.


49
New cards

Kelley’s covariation model

how people make internal vs. external attributions:

3 dimensions

  • Consistency

  • Distinctiveness

  • Consensus


50
New cards

EXTERNAL ATTRIBUTION

If consistency is high, distinctiveness is high, and consensus is high

51
New cards

INTERNAL ATTRIBUTION

If consistency is high, distinctiveness is low, and consensus is low

52
New cards

fundamental attribution error

A mistaken inference that a behavior (or outcome) is caused by a person’s disposition (Example: an internal attribution).

Key Studies:

  • Jones & Harris’ Anti- & Pro-Castro speechmakers

  • Ross et al.’s “ Quiz Show”


53
New cards

possible causes of fundamental attribution error

  • Correspondence bias

  • Actor/observer difference due to perceptual salience

  • Biased sampling (seeing others in 1 or very few situations)

  • 2 step process

    • Automatic internal attribution

    • Controlled search for situational factors

  • Cultural values/beliefs


54
New cards

attributional processes and biases

  • Self-Serving Attributions

    • Positive outcomes » Internal

    • Negative outcomes » External

    • Why?

      • Maintain Self-Esteem

      • Self-Presentation to others

      • Self-efficacy, illusion of control, and unrealistic optimism


55
New cards

individualist

  • more prone to FAE

  • Subject to actor-observer and correspondence biases

  • More prone to self-serving attributions


56
New cards

collectivist

  • Less prone to FAE

  • Subject to actor-observer and correspondence biases (when situational info is missing)

  • Less prone to self-serving attributions


57
New cards

judgemental overconfidence

Overestimating the accuracy of our beliefs about others and ourselves.

  • people thought they would be more correct when assuming other people.


58
New cards

causes of judgmental overconfidence

  • We over-rely on dispositions to predict behavior

  • We over-rely on first impressions, which may be grossly inaccurate (due to the influence of schemas, unrepresentativeness, etc.)

  • Our implicit personality theories may be inaccurate

  • Self-fulfilling prophecy and confirmation bias can contribute to a persistent belief in our own accuracy


59
New cards

defensive attributions

a conclusion that things that happen, if they are bad, happen because people bring it on themselves. They won’t happen to us so we are unlikely to have bad things happen to us.

  • belief in just world

  • why?

    • maintain self-esteem

    • reduce threat/uncertainty

    • self-efficacy, illusion of control, and unrealistic optimism


60
New cards

bias blind spot

believing we are less subject to such biases/errors than others.

  • people think that others are highly susceptible to self serving bias while they themselves aren’t as susceptible.