1/59
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
social psychology
Scientific study of the way in which people’s thoughts, feelings, and actions are influenced by the real or imagined presence of other people.
dueling proverbs
common sense gives us conflicting predictions.
Does “absence make the heart grow fonder” or is “out of sight, out of mind”?
hindsight bias
Outcomes seem obvious and easy to predict in retrospect
Makes findings of social psychology seem trite and banal
When judging the decisions of others, ___ ___ affects our evaluations of them
Examples:
Invasion of Iraq (WMDs)
Dylan Roof and the mass murder at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church
Ross and Samuels
Social psychologists study the power of the situation to influence behavior
Participants identified as competitive or cooperative by dorm RAs
Participants played a game labeled as either “Wall Street” or “Community”
Correspondence bias
We tend to overestimate the power of personality (internal factors) and underestimate the power of the situation (external factors) in determining the behavior of others (correspondence bias), resulting in erroneous internal attributions (FAE).
Construals
How people interpret, understand, and represent social situations determines affect, cognition, and behavior.
_____ are subjective and vary among individuals - social perception is a constructive process
_____ are influenced by 4 primary motives:
to be accurate
to feel good about ourselves
to achieve acceptance and approval of others
to reduce uncertainty and enhance perceptions of control.
self fulfilling prophecy
Rosenthal & Jacobsen (1968)
“Bloomers” vs. “Non-Bloomers”
Students identified as IQ Bloomer to teachers
Bloomers exhibited a 4 pt higher increase in IQ than Non-bloomers
Students not identified as bloomers but who showed IQ gains were less liked by teachers!
science vs common sense
objective, rigorous data collection
conclusions based on analysis of data
error can be corrected
vs
subjective, bias data collection
impressionistic conclusions
no corrective features - error persists
theory
a coherent set of related principles that explains observed phenomena
hypothesis
a specific falsifiable prediction derived from theory
internal validity
random assignment + control of extraneous variables
external validity
representative sample + psychological realism
High Internal Validity
“Bloomer” label assigned randomly + students/parents unaware of the label
High External Validity
Sample of varied ethnicity, ability etc. + Real classroom, real IQ tests
the factors that affect significance
magnitude of effect
variability in data
sample size
samples
we study ___, not population.
we draw inferences about populations using data obtained from samples.
therefore, any result can be due to chance alone.
it’s always a question of probability, never of certainty.
statistical significance
When the outcome is probably not due to chance.
practical significance
When the outcome is large enough to make a meaningful difference in real life.
advantages of correlational research
No manipulation or control of variables required
You can use “in vivo” data
Avoid many ethical and practical limitations
limitations of correlational research
cannot control or manipulate variables
no causal conclusions can be drawn
directionality problem
3rd variable problem
human beings
“Cognitive Misers”
“Satisficers”
Users of limited resource capacity, confronted by often impoverished information, subject to a plethora of biases
“Meaning makers”
automatic social cognition
non-conscious
unintentional
involuntary
effortless
fast
controlled social cognition
conscious
intentional
voluntary
effortful
slow
schemas
Mental structures used to organize/process social information and experience
regulate attention
influence construals
guide memory reconstruction
Examples: scripts, categories, associations
most influential when information is ambiguous or resources are taxed.
chronic accessibility
schemmas so often activated that they are “always” available
schema accessibility
chronic accessibility
temporary accessibility
goal pursuit activates related schemas
can be activated by priming
supraliminal
subliminal
examples
supraliminal priming
A psychological process where an individual is exposed to a conscious, fully perceptible stimulus that subtly influences their subsequent thoughts, judgments, or behaviors.
Higgins, Rholes, & Jones (1977) had Ss memorize + or - words (e.g., reckless, foolhardy, OR adventurous, self- confident)
All Ss read the same description of Donald
Who was more likely to perceive Donald negatively? Who was more likely to perceive him positively?
subliminal priming
The presentation of a sensory stimulus below the absolute threshold of conscious awareness (the limen) that activates a mental representation and influences a subsequent behavioral, emotional, or cognitive response without the individual's conscious knowledge.
Bargh & Pietromonaco (1982) exposed Ss to hostile or neutral words for 1/20 sec.
All Ss read the same description of Donald
Who was more likely to perceive Donald as hostile?
illusory correlation
may be erroneous
examples:
“it always rains when I wash my car..”
“crazy things are mor elilely when the moon is full”
Tversky’s “myth of the hot hand”
perseverance effect
relatively resistant to disconfirmatory evidence
example:
Ross, Lepper, & Hubbard (1975): Ss were to guess which suicide notes were real
Ss rec’d false feedback: Success (24/25) or failure (10/25)
Ss were then informed feedback was false, then asked how many they believed they got right and how they would do on a new test.
Schema Perseverance
Other contributing factors
Confirmation bias
Sampling bias
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Culture & systems of shared beliefs
less likely
Priming Ss with the construct “politeness” made them ___ ___ to interrupt experimenter
slowly
Priming Ss with the social category “elderly” caused them to walk more ___
chameleon effect
Subject has the goal of affiliation!
Ss primed to affiliate supraliminal or subliminal exhibited greater behavioral mimicry than controls. (Chartrand & Lakin 2003)
Ostracized Ss engaged in more mimicry than controls who weren’t ostracized (Lakin et al., 2008)
heuristics
availability
representativeness
anchoring and adjustment
availability
Judgment of likelihood based on how easily examples are called to mind
representativeness
Judgment of likelihood based on how closely a particular instance matches “typical” case
anchoring and adjustment
Judgment influenced by an arbitrary, unrelated value used as an “anchor” from which insufficient adjustment is made.
controlled social cognition
Motivation + Resource Availability
Motivation can be varied by manipulating outcome dependency
Resource availability can be varied by manipulating speed, competing tasks, or fatigue
counterfactual thinking
Upward vs. Downward _____
A function of proximity to “cutoff”
Upward = Negative affect, but increased motivation
Downward = Positive affect, but no motivational enhancement
Social perception
the process by which we form impressions of and make inferences about other people.
a construcive process influenced by schemas.
nonverbal behavior
mostly automatic, and includes:
facial expressions
eye contact, gaze
extravocal cues (volume, pitch speed, inflection)
intentional gestures
body language (posture, orientation, distance, etc.)
deception
People can mask or exhibit emotions contrary to what they really feel.
six basic emotions
Fear
Anger
Surprise
Happiness
Disgust
Sadness
Universal and appear early in life.
display rules
Influences emotional expression; ___ ___ that are unique to each culture dictate when different nonverbal behaviors are appropriate to display.
display blends
Decoding < 100% accurate because people may ___ ___ of multiple affects simultaneously.
gender differences
Women are better than men at both decoding and encoding nonverbal behavior.
exception: anger
causal attribution
inferring the causes of outcomes (e.g., behaviors, performance, etc.)
Heider’s dichotomy for people’s explanations: internal (dispositional) attributions and external (situational) attributions.
Kelley’s covariation model
how people make internal vs. external attributions:
3 dimensions
Consistency
Distinctiveness
Consensus
EXTERNAL ATTRIBUTION
If consistency is high, distinctiveness is high, and consensus is high
INTERNAL ATTRIBUTION
If consistency is high, distinctiveness is low, and consensus is low
fundamental attribution error
A mistaken inference that a behavior (or outcome) is caused by a person’s disposition (Example: an internal attribution).
Key Studies:
Jones & Harris’ Anti- & Pro-Castro speechmakers
Ross et al.’s “ Quiz Show”
possible causes of fundamental attribution error
Correspondence bias
Actor/observer difference due to perceptual salience
Biased sampling (seeing others in 1 or very few situations)
2 step process
Automatic internal attribution
Controlled search for situational factors
Cultural values/beliefs
attributional processes and biases
Self-Serving Attributions
Positive outcomes » Internal
Negative outcomes » External
Why?
Maintain Self-Esteem
Self-Presentation to others
Self-efficacy, illusion of control, and unrealistic optimism
individualist
more prone to FAE
Subject to actor-observer and correspondence biases
More prone to self-serving attributions
collectivist
Less prone to FAE
Subject to actor-observer and correspondence biases (when situational info is missing)
Less prone to self-serving attributions
judgemental overconfidence
Overestimating the accuracy of our beliefs about others and ourselves.
people thought they would be more correct when assuming other people.
causes of judgmental overconfidence
We over-rely on dispositions to predict behavior
We over-rely on first impressions, which may be grossly inaccurate (due to the influence of schemas, unrepresentativeness, etc.)
Our implicit personality theories may be inaccurate
Self-fulfilling prophecy and confirmation bias can contribute to a persistent belief in our own accuracy
defensive attributions
a conclusion that things that happen, if they are bad, happen because people bring it on themselves. They won’t happen to us so we are unlikely to have bad things happen to us.
belief in just world
why?
maintain self-esteem
reduce threat/uncertainty
self-efficacy, illusion of control, and unrealistic optimism
bias blind spot
believing we are less subject to such biases/errors than others.
people think that others are highly susceptible to self serving bias while they themselves aren’t as susceptible.