Public Order

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/140

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:09 AM on 8/3/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

141 Terms

1
New cards

What are the main sources of police public-order powers?

Statute, particularly the Public Order Act 1986; the common law relating to breach of the peace; and human-rights obligations under the Human Rights Act 1998.

2
New cards

Which statutory provision requires police to comply with Convention rights when exercising public-order powers?

Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998.

3
New cards

Which Convention rights are particularly relevant to public-order policing?

Article 10 freedom of expression, Article 11 freedom of assembly and association, and sometimes Article 5 liberty and security.

4
New cards

What is the constitutional principle of residual freedom?

Individuals may do anything that the law does not prohibit.

5
New cards

How has the traditional principle of residual freedom been modified?

The Human Rights Act 1998 and the ECHR provide positive protection for rights, requiring police to balance public order against individual freedoms.

6
New cards

What three requirements must state interference satisfy under the proportionality principle?

It must be prescribed by law, pursue a legitimate aim, and be necessary in a democratic society, meaning proportionate.

7
New cards

What modern framework applies when assessing proportionality under public-order offences?

Ask whether Convention rights are engaged, whether the offence itself adequately balances proportionality, and, if not, whether proportionality can be secured through a defence or other mechanism.

8
New cards

Which cases are associated with the modern proportionality framework for public-order offences?

Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland—Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Bill and R v Satri.

9
New cards

What does section 11(1) of the Public Order Act 1986 regulate?

Advance notice of certain public processions.

10
New cards

What is a procession for the purposes of the Public Order Act 1986?

A group of people moving together along a route.

11
New cards

What did Flockhart v Robinson establish about a procession?

Flockhart v Robinson described a procession as a group moving along a route and identified the organiser as the person directing that route.

12
New cards

Who is treated as the organiser of a public procession?

The person who directs or controls the route of the procession.

13
New cards

Where must a procession occur to fall within section 11 of the Public Order Act 1986?

In a public place, as defined by section 16.

14
New cards

When is advance notice of a public procession required under section 11?

Where the procession is intended to support or oppose views, publicise a cause or campaign, or commemorate an event.

15
New cards

Is advance notice required for a procession intended to support particular views?

Yes.

16
New cards

Is advance notice required for a procession intended to oppose particular views?

Yes.

17
New cards

Is advance notice required for a procession intended to publicise a cause?

Yes.

18
New cards

Is advance notice required for a procession intended to commemorate an event?

Yes.

19
New cards

How much advance notice must generally be given for a public procession?

Six clear days’ written notice.

20
New cards

What information must be included in notice of a public procession?

The date, time and proposed route.

21
New cards

What is the effect of failing to give required notice of a procession?

It is an offence under section 11(7) of the Public Order Act 1986.

22
New cards

What processions are exempt from the advance-notice requirement?

Customary processions and funeral processions.

23
New cards

What is a customary procession under section 11 of the Public Order Act 1986?

A procession that has occurred regularly as an established custom.

24
New cards

What is an example of a customary procession?

A religious procession to a shrine held every Easter over many years.

25
New cards

Are funeral processions subject to the section 11 advance-notice requirement?

No.

26
New cards

What did Kay v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis establish about customary processions?

Kay v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis held that Critical Mass cycling events could be customary processions despite varying routes and spontaneous organisation.

27
New cards

Why could Critical Mass cycling events qualify as customary processions?

Their recurring and established character was sufficient despite changes in route and a lack of formal organisation.

28
New cards

What does section 12(1) of the Public Order Act 1986 regulate?

Police conditions imposed on public processions.

29
New cards

Who may impose conditions on a public procession under section 12?

A senior police officer as defined by section 12(2).

30
New cards

What core risks may justify conditions on a procession under section 12?

Serious public disorder, serious damage to property, or serious disruption to the life of the community.

31
New cards

Can noise affecting organisations justify conditions on a procession?

Yes, in England and Wales, where the noise may cause serious disruption to an organisation’s activities.

32
New cards

Can noise affecting nearby individuals justify conditions on a procession?

Yes, in England and Wales, where the noise may have a significant impact on people in the vicinity.

33
New cards

What intimidation may justify conditions on a public procession?

Conduct intended to compel others to do, or refrain from doing, something.

34
New cards

What did Police v Reid establish about intimidation in public-order law?

Police v Reid held that intimidation requires an intention to compel behaviour, not merely to cause fear, discomfort or annoyance.

35
New cards

Is causing fear or discomfort alone sufficient to establish intimidation under section 12?

No. There must be an intention to compel another person’s behaviour.

36
New cards

Which legislation expanded the grounds for imposing conditions on protests to include matters such as noise?

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022.

37
New cards

What kinds of conditions may police impose on a public procession?

Necessary and proportionate conditions such as route changes, time restrictions or limits on participant numbers.

38
New cards

What principles must conditions imposed on a procession satisfy?

They must be preventative, necessary and proportionate.

39
New cards

Is written notice required where procession conditions are imposed in advance?

Yes, under section 12(3) of the Public Order Act 1986.

40
New cards

What did R (Brehony) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police establish about protest conditions?

R (Brehony) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police held that police must provide sufficient reasons for conditions so protesters can understand the decision.

41
New cards

Must police give detailed reasons for every procession condition?

They must give sufficient reasons, though not necessarily exhaustive detail.

42
New cards

What offence does an organiser commit under section 12(4)?

Failing to comply with a lawful condition imposed on the procession.

43
New cards

What offence does a participant commit under section 12(5)?

Knowingly failing to comply with a lawful condition imposed on the procession.

44
New cards

What offence is created by section 12(6)?

Inciting another person to fail to comply with a procession condition.

45
New cards

What defence is available for failure to comply with a procession condition?

That the failure resulted from circumstances beyond the defendant’s control.

46
New cards

What knowledge requirement applies to a participant charged under section 12?

The participant must have known or ought to have known that the condition existed.

47
New cards

Which provision contains the knowledge requirement for procession participants?

Section 12(5A) of the Public Order Act 1986.

48
New cards

What maximum sanction may be imposed on an organiser who breaches a procession condition?

Up to 51 weeks’ imprisonment or a fine.

49
New cards

What sanction may be imposed on a participant who breaches a procession condition?

A fine.

50
New cards

What sanction may be imposed for inciting breach of a procession condition?

Imprisonment or a fine.

51
New cards

What does section 13 of the Public Order Act 1986 permit?

The prohibition of public processions where conditions under section 12 would be insufficient to prevent serious public disorder.

52
New cards

When may a chief police officer seek a prohibition on processions?

Where the officer reasonably believes section 12 conditions would be insufficient to prevent serious public disorder.

53
New cards

Who ordinarily applies for an order prohibiting public processions?

The chief police officer applies through the local authority.

54
New cards

Whose consent is required for a procession prohibition order?

The Home Secretary’s consent.

55
New cards

What is the maximum duration of a procession prohibition order?

Three months.

56
New cards

Can a local authority initiate a procession ban of its own motion?

No. It acts only following an application from the chief police officer.

57
New cards

What special procedure applies to procession bans in London?

The Metropolitan Police Commissioner may make the order directly without a local-authority application, but Home Secretary consent is still required.

58
New cards

Is Home Secretary consent required for a London procession ban?

Yes.

59
New cards

What did Kent v Metropolitan Police Commissioner establish about procession bans?

Kent v Metropolitan Police Commissioner upheld a ban on all processions and demonstrated judicial reluctance to interfere with police operational judgment.

60
New cards

What criticism was made of the procession ban imposed after the 2011 London riots?

The 30-day ban covered a very large area and was criticised as excessively broad.

61
New cards

What does section 14(1) of the Public Order Act 1986 regulate?

Police conditions imposed on public assemblies.

62
New cards

What is a public assembly under section 16 of the Public Order Act 1986?

An assembly of two or more people in a public place that is wholly or partly open to the air.

63
New cards

How many people are required for a public assembly under section 14?

Two or more people.

64
New cards

What was the previous numerical threshold for a public assembly?

Twenty people.

65
New cards

Must a public assembly occur in a public place?

Yes.

66
New cards

Must a public assembly be wholly or partly open-air?

Yes.

67
New cards

Which legislation introduced special controls for one-person protests?

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022.

68
New cards

Which provision concerns one-person protests?

Section 14ZA of the Public Order Act 1986.

69
New cards

What did R (Jones) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis establish about the meaning of an assembly?

R (Jones) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis held that disruptive activities spread over 12 days and multiple locations did not amount to a single assembly under section 14.

70
New cards

Is advance notice required for a public assembly under section 14?

No.

71
New cards

Does the purpose of an assembly determine whether section 14 applies?

No. The purpose is irrelevant.

72
New cards

What are the main differences between a procession and an assembly under the Public Order Act 1986?

Processions involve movement and may require advance notice; assemblies are stationary gatherings, require no advance notice, and their purpose is irrelevant.

73
New cards

What grounds may justify conditions on a public assembly?

Serious disorder, property damage, serious disruption, qualifying noise impacts or intimidation.

74
New cards

What did Police v Reid establish about intimidation at assemblies?

Police v Reid held that the person must intend to compel others not to do something they are entitled to do; mere intimidation or discomfort is insufficient.

75
New cards

What conditions may police impose on a public assembly?

Conditions such as time limits, location restrictions or maximum attendance.

76
New cards

How serious must the anticipated harm be before assembly conditions may be imposed?

The senior officer need only reasonably believe that the relevant harm may occur.

77
New cards

Must assembly conditions be proportionate?

Yes. They should be necessary, temporary and appropriately limited.

78
New cards

What did Brehony establish about assembly conditions?

Brehony held that protest restrictions must be proportionate and supported by sufficient reasons.

79
New cards

What test did DPP v James establish for the police belief required under section 14?

The officer must hold an honest subjective belief supported by objectively reasonable grounds.

80
New cards

Is a separate ECHR proportionality assessment required after the DPP v James test is satisfied?

The notes indicate that proportionality is treated as satisfied without a separate balancing exercise.

81
New cards

Which cases support the distinction between honest belief and reasonable grounds?

R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte Rossminster Ltd and O’Hara v Chief Constable of the RUC.

82
New cards

Who is the senior officer for conditions imposed on an assembly at the scene?

The most senior police officer present.

83
New cards

Is written notice required when assembly conditions are imposed in advance?

Yes, under section 14(3).

84
New cards

Do police have power under section 14 to ban public assemblies completely?

No. Section 14 permits conditions but not a complete ban equivalent to section 13 processions.

85
New cards

What reasons must police provide for assembly conditions?

Sufficient reasons enabling protesters to understand why the restrictions were imposed.

86
New cards

Which case establishes the requirement to provide sufficient reasons for protest conditions?

R (Brehony) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police.

87
New cards

Under what legal framework was the Sarah Everard vigil restricted?

Public-health legislation relating to COVID-19 rather than the Public Order Act 1986.

88
New cards

What does section 14A of the Public Order Act 1986 regulate?

Prohibitions on trespassory assemblies.

89
New cards

How many people are required for a trespassory assembly under section 14A?

Twenty or more people.

90
New cards

On what kind of land must a trespassory assembly occur?

Open-air land to which the public has no right of access or only a limited right of access.

91
New cards

What access requirement must be satisfied before an assembly can be prohibited under section 14A?

The assembly must lack permission or exceed the participants’ rights of access.

92
New cards

What anticipated harm may justify prohibiting a trespassory assembly?

Serious disruption to the life of the community or significant damage to important land, buildings or monuments.

93
New cards

Who initiates the process for prohibiting a trespassory assembly?

The chief police officer applies for a prohibition order through the local authority.

94
New cards

What offences arise under section 14B in relation to a prohibited trespassory assembly?

Organising, participating in or inciting participation in the assembly.

95
New cards

What did DPP v Jones establish about peaceful assembly on a highway?

DPP v Jones held that peaceful, non-obstructive protest on a highway could be a lawful use of the public highway and did not necessarily amount to trespass.

96
New cards

Why was the conviction overturned in DPP v Jones?

The highway was a public space and the peaceful protest did not unreasonably obstruct its use.

97
New cards

What right did DPP v Jones recognise in relation to highways?

A right to peaceful assembly on a highway, provided the activity is reasonable and non-obstructive.

98
New cards

What is the definition of a breach of the peace from R v Howell?

A breach of the peace occurs where harm is actually done or is likely to be done to a person or, in their presence, to their property, or where a person fears such harm through assault, affray, riot, unlawful assembly or other disturbance.

99
New cards

Which case provides the modern definition of breach of the peace?

R v Howell.

100
New cards

Must actual harm occur before there can be a breach of the peace?

No. A sufficiently likely threat of harm or fear of such harm may be enough.