Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Need for Affiliation
A desire to establish social contact with others
“What is the most important thing in life?”
Relationships with family, friends, and romantic partners
Interpersonal Attraction
How much we like (are attracted to) another person
Causes (or determinants) of Interpersonal Attraction
Situation-centred determinant
Target-centred determinants
Situation-Centred Determinants
Proximity
The physical closeness or nearness between two people
We are more likely to become friends with, and attracted to, someone who is geographically close to us
Most people marry someone who is geographically close to them
Why does proximity often lead to liking?
Mere exposure effect (aka repeated exposure effect)
Social rewards
Expectations of future interactions
Mere Exposure Effect (aka repeated exposure effect)
The tendency for novel stimuli to be liked more (e.g., be rated more positively) after we have been repeatedly exposed to them
Social Rewards
Things like companionship, approval, and help
Can be obtained at relatively little cost/are easier to obtain from those who live near us
Expectations of Future Interactions
We can reasonably expect to interact with the people who are near to us on a regular basis
Target-Centred Determinants
Similarity
Reciprocity of liking
Physical attractiveness
Similarity
We tend to like others who are similar to us in terms of their attitudes, interests, values, personality traits, and demographic characteristics (e.g., race, religion)
“Birds of a feather flock together”
Why does attitude similarity influence liking?
It is rewarding to have someone else agree with our attitudes
Boosts our self-confidence in the correctness of our own attitudes
Arouses positive feelings (i.e., makes us feel good when someone else agrees with us)
Reciprocity of Liking
We are usually like people who like us
Ingratiation… a deliberate attempt to gain favour with another person
Physical Attractiveness
People’s looks
Why is this bias for beauty so pervasive?
Aesthetic appeal
What is beautiful is good stereotype (aka halo effect)
Physically attractive people are generally perceived as being happier, more intelligent, outgoing, sociable, friendlier, warmer, and successful than less attractive people
“Good things come in beautiful packages”
Aesthetic Appeal
We find their appearance pleasing (rewarding) to look at (“easy on the eyes”)
What is Beautiful is Good Stereotype (aka halo effect)
The belief that physically attractive people possess other socially desirable characteristics as well
Social Profit
Being friends with someone who is highly attractive may enhance other people’s perceptions of how attractive you are perceived as being
Some of the “glow” of the highly attractive person’s beauty will rub off onto you
Radiation Effect
A person of average attractiveness tends to be rated as more attractive when they are paired with someone who is highly attractive
Occurs with same-sex pairs (both males and females)
Among opposite sex pairs, an average-looking man will benefit from being paired with a highly attractive woman
Evaluations of women do not seem to be affected by the looks of their male partner
Contrast Effect
A person of average attractiveness tends to be rated as more attractive after others have just seen an unattractive person of the same sex but, is rated as less attractive when others have just seen someone who is highly attractive
Matching Phenomenon
The tendency for most people to pair off with someone who is about as physically attractive as they are
Friendships and marriages
What is Beauty?
Is it objective and measurable human characteristics
Is it more subjective (i.e., “in the eye of the beholder”)
Two Categories of Women’s Faces That Male Undergraduates Find Particularly Attractive
“Baby-face” (or child-like) facial features
Large eyes, full lips, small nose, and a small chin
“Mature” facial features
Prominent cheekbones, high eyebrows, large pupils, and a big smile
What Features of a Man’s Face fo Female Undergraduates Find Particularly Attractive?
“Mature” facial features
Small eyes, a broad forehead, thin lips, and a large jaw
Facial Symmetry
The left and right sides of the face are similar in appearance
Evolutionary Perspective
Men and women have evolved different preferences because these preferences maximize their chances of reproductive success (i.e., passing their genes on to the next generation)
Men are more attracted to women whose facial features and bodily appearance suggest youth, health, and fertility
For example, smooth unblemished skin, shiny hair, facial symmetry, normal body weight
Women are more attracted to men whose facial features and bodily characteristics suggest maturity and physical strength
Attractiveness Study
Personal ads from a large mid-western American newspaper
Scoring:
Who wrote the ad… a man or woman?
What was the writer offering… physical attractiveness or material resources?
What was the writer seeking… physical attractiveness or material resources?
Main findings:
Offering:
Women were more likely than men to be offering physical appearance
Men were more likely to be offering material resources
Seeking:
Men were more likely than women to be seeking a young, physically attractive partner
Women were more likely than men to be seeking an older, financially secure partner
Subjective Nature of Beauty
Shifting cultural standards of what is considered attractive
Radiation and contrast effects
“Costs” of Being Beautiful
“Are people being nice to me just because they think i’m good looking or do they genuinely like me for who I am?”
Pressure to maintain one’s physical appearance
Different Types of Love
Friendship, romantic, Infatuation, paternal, maternal, brotherly, sisterly, spiritual, divine, obsessive, possessive, conditional, unconditional, self…
What Does Being “In Love” Feel Like?
Lots of different ways to describe it
Passionate, emotional, physical, relaxed…
Robert Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love
Intimacy
Passion
Commitment
Makes 7 types of love:
Liking
Infatuation
Empty
Romantic
Compationate
Fatuous
Consumate
Intimacy
Confiding in someone, closeness, giving and receiving of emotional support, trust
Passion
Physical attraction, sexual arousal, desire
Commitment
The decision that you and your partner are in love, you wanna be together, you wanna stay with your partner into the future, stay committed to them
Liking
Friendship, intimacy without passion/commitment
Infatuation
Experience of passion without intimacy/commitment, love at first site, puppy love
Empty
Commitment without intimacy/passion, stagnant marriage, empty shell marriage, unhappy couple who stays together
Romantic
Intimacy and passion without commitment, summer love affair, holiday fling
Compationate
Intimacy and commitment without passion, commited marriage
Fatuous
Passion and commitment without intimacy, whirlwind courtship
Consumate
Passion, intimacy, commitment all present, the ideal type of love
Elaine Hatfield and Ellen Berscheid (1978)
2 main types of love:
Passionate
Companionate
Passionate love scale
Passionate Love
“A state of intense longing for union with another person”
Exciting and emotional
Characterized by high arousal, intense attraction, and fear of rejection
Companionate Love
“The affection we feel for those with whom our lives are deeply entwined”
Companionate lovers care very deeply for eachother
A secure, trusting, and stable partnership
Attachment Styles
Secure attachment
Avoidant attachment
Anxious/ambivalent attachment (aka preoccupied attachment)
Secure Attachment
Parent is consistently responsive to the child’s needs (i.e., always there when needed)
Avoidant Attachment
Parent is generally unresponsive or even rejecting in times of need or distress
Uncomfortable with intimacy, distance themselves emotionally
Anxious/Ambivolent Attachment (aka Preoccupied Attachment)
Parent does not respond consistently to the child’s needs (i.e., is available sometimes but not other times)
Mary Ainsworth… White, American, Middle Class children
Secure… 65%
Avoidant… 23%
Anxious/ambivalent… 12%
Cindy Hazan and Philip Shaver
Percentage of adults with different attachment styles:
Secure… 56%
Avoidant… 25%
Anxious/ambivalent… 19%
Two Types of Avoidant Attachment Styles (Kim Bartholomew)
Fearful-avoidant style
Dismissing-avoidant style
Fearful-Avoidant Style
Would like to have close relationships, but avoid them because they have difficulty trusting others
Low self-esteem (i.e., negative view of themselves)
Low interpersonal trust (i.e., negative view of others)
Dismissing-Avoidant Style
Claim that they don’t need close relationships with others and would rather be by themselves anyway
Low interpersonal trust (i.e., negative view of others)
High self-esteem (i.e., positive view of themselves)