1/38
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Survey
asks people questions for research purposes
Self-reports
dominant method of studying the etiology of crime, frequency/prevelance
Perceptions and attitudes
to learn how people feel about cj policy and crime
Targeted victim surveys
Used to evaluate policy innovations and program success
Counting crime
Asking people about victimization counters problems of data collected by police
Floaters
respondents who choose a substantive answer when they really don’t know
Survey research
Low validity, high reliability
Qualitative Interview
General plan of inquiry by interviewer, study complex processes, lived experiences, roles and identities
Structured interview
consists of predetermined questions and answer sets
Interview schedule:
the structure of the interview that may have predetermined questions or topical areas to be discussed
Semi-structured interview:
have standardized questions but allow the interviewer to explore themes that emerge during the interview
Unstructured interview:
are the most open style of interviewing; provides the most breadth, depth, and natural interaction with participants
attention probe
lean in
continuing probe
nod
Sensitizing concepts
general references and
guides about what you are looking for
Thinking units:
a simple framework for making
sense of all the stories that emerge
Grounded theory:
stems from an analysis of patterns, themes, and common categories discovered in data. Theoretical sampling might be used to confirm themes that are observed
Theoretical saturation
Occurs when you reach the point when additional interviewing does not yield new
results
Obtrusive or reactive measurement:
research subjects are aware that they
are being studied.
Unobtrusive measurement:
does not involve direct interaction between researchers and subjects, and the latter are unaware that they are being studied.
Complete observer:
observes without becoming a participant
Observer-as-participant:
make known your position as a researcher; do not actually
participate
Participant-as-observer:
make known your position as a researcher and participate with
the group
Complete participant:
participates fully; true
identity and purpose are not known to
subject
go native
going along to get along
Observations
High validity, improve with field notes and transcripts. Hard to generalize. Reliability increase with attention to detail
Evaluation research:
refers to a research purpose rather than a specific method; seeks to evaluate the impact of interventions; if some result was produced
Problem analysis:
designed to help public officials
choose from alternative future actions
Evidence-based policy:
actions of justice agencies are linked to evidence used for planning and evaluation
Evidence generation:
nonprofit organizations that
document and evaluate programming to create
evidence that can be shared with others
policy intervention
an action taken for the purpose of producing some intended
result
Impact assessment:
examines whether policies have the desired effects
Process evaluation:
examines whether policies are being carried out as planned
Policy analysis
used to help design alternative courses of action and choose among them
INPUTS:
Resources, guidelines, rules, and
operating procedures provided for a program.
ACTIVITIES:
Specifies what is done in the project
with the inputs (resources).
RESULTS:
Specific consequences of the project
activities or the program’s specific objectives.
OUTCOMES:
Accomplishment of broader-range
societal goals; these are general consequences of
the specific accomplishments (outputs/results) of the
program
FEEDBACK:
Recycling of results/outcomes into the
operation as additional (or modified) inputs