GCSE Psychology, memory paper1

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/53

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

54 Terms

1
New cards

Three types of encoding

Acoustic, visual, sensory

2
New cards

Output

A behavioural response/ information we recall

3
New cards

Processing

Operations performed in the brain on sensory memory

4
New cards

Storage

Retention of information in our memory system

5
New cards

Encoding

Turning sensory information into something which can be stored easier by the brain

6
New cards

Short term memory capacity

7 items of information

7
New cards

Short term memory duration

18 seconds

8
New cards

Long term memory capacity and duration

Unlimited

9
New cards

Similarity between long term and short term memory

Both can rehearse information to hold the information for longer

10
New cards

Difference between long term and short term memory

Short term usually has acoustic encoding but long term has semantic encoding

11
New cards

Interference

New information overwrites old information such as a new phone number replacing an old number

12
New cards

Displacement

New information pushes out old information in the short term memory as it's capacity is being exceeded

13
New cards

Three ways we forget things

interference, displacement, decay memory traces

14
New cards

Anterograde amnesia

Inability to store any long-term memories following a brain injury. Normal short-term can still process sensory memory. Retained long-term memory from before the incident.

15
New cards

Retrograde amnesia

Cannot remember anything from before the injury due to struggle in recalling the information. Can be specific to one memory such as the traumatic incident or it can be limited time frame. Severe cases can result in forgetting who they are. It is possible to regain information

16
New cards

Reconstructive memory

Is the theory that memories are interpretations from what we experienced, not an exact recall

17
New cards

Active reconstruction

Memory is not an exact copy of the event but our own interpretation of it which is influenced by our own schema

18
New cards

Schema

Packet of knowledge unique to us which we develop over time through experiences that influences how we remember

19
New cards

How are schemas formed

Personal experiences

20
New cards

Four influences of recall

Omissions, transformations, familiarisations, rationalisations

21
New cards

Omissions

We leave out unfamiliar, irrelevant or unpleasant details which simplifies the information

22
New cards

Transformations

Details are changed to make them more rational

23
New cards

Familiarisation

Change unfamiliar details to align your own schema

24
New cards

Rationalisation

Add details when we recall to give a reason for something

25
New cards

Strengths of the theory of reconstructive memory

It has real-world application, ecologically valid, encourages cognitive therapy to avoid omissions in eyewitness accounts

26
New cards

Weaknesses of the theory of reconstructive memory

Subjective as Bartlett gave his own interpretation of the participants recall so it can be seen as unscientific

27
New cards

Describe Atkinson and Shiffrin's study on Multi-store model of memory including proposal

They proposed that memory stores differ from each other in the way information is encoded, recalled, or it's capacity and duration. The theory states that we input information to our brains from our senses in our sensory register. Attention then moves it to our Short term and then rehearsal is necessary for information to move from the short term memory to the long term.

28
New cards

Strengths of Multi-store model of memory

It is an accurate representation of our three different types of stores for memory

29
New cards

Weaknesses of Multi-store model of memory

It overstates the role of rehearsal since other factors affect what goes into the long term memory, unlikely that we have one type of long term memory

30
New cards

Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study aim

Test the nature of reconstructive memory and whether someone's schema affects their memory

31
New cards

Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study procedure

Participants were asked to read a story and recall it using serial reproduction or repeated reproduction. For serial reproduction, participants retold the story to another participant after 15-30 minutes and the chain continued. For repeated reproduction, participants were asked to re-write the story after 15 minutes and then again weeks, months or even years later

32
New cards

Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study results on rationalisation

Rationalisation was the most common as people added in a lot to the story to give reason for events. For example, "something black came out of his mouth" was changed to "foam came out" or "last dying breath"

33
New cards

Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study results on familiarisation

"canoe" was changed to "boat" and "hunting" was changed to "fishing" since these are more simpler and familiar to us

34
New cards

Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study conclusion

Bartlett interpreted the results as active reconstruction. Participants did not recover the results accurately fully as they omitted, altered or added information to fit their schemas

35
New cards

Validity/realism of Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study

Remembering a story is a realistic use of memory therefore the study is ecologically valid however some words were uncommon in the story and this made it unrealistic for certain cultures

36
New cards

Reliability of Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study

Bartlett replicated his study many times using different stories or images and got similar results for all therefore the consistency means it is reliable

37
New cards

Scientific side of Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study

It can be seen as unscientific as Bartlett used his own interpretation of qualitative data to conclude. He also did not use a standardised procedure since he allowed the participants to take their own pace and time. The lack of good control could also be seen as unscientific

38
New cards

Peterson+Peterson Short term memory experiment aim

To test the true duration of short the term memory by interfering with rehearsal

39
New cards

Peterson+Peterson Short term memory experiment procedure

Students were asked to repeat a given trigram after the time periods of 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 seconds. During that time, they had to count backwards in three digit numbers to prevent rehearsal of the trigram. This was repeated on every individual 48 times. The second experiment repeated the same tasks but allowed some participants to rehearse the trigram before counting

40
New cards

Peterson+Peterson Short term memory experiment results

The longer each student had to count backwards for, the less able they were to accurately recall the trigram. After 3 seconds, 80% could accurately recall however after 18 seconds, less than 10% could accurately recall

41
New cards

Peterson+Peterson Short term memory experiment conclusion

With the participants unable to rehearse the trigrams, the information decayed rapidly decays from our short term memory and only 10% of information is accurately recalled after 18 seconds

42
New cards

Mundane realism

A realistic and everyday task

43
New cards

Reliability of Peterson+Peterson Short term memory experiment

A standardised procedure was used. For example, fixed timings were used and extraneous variables such as noise were eliminated. This means it can be replicated which makes it reliable

44
New cards

Application/strength of Peterson+Peterson Short term memory experiment

The experiment demonstrated how vocal interference (counting backwards) can affect our ability to retain information

45
New cards

Weakness of Peterson+Peterson Short term memory experiment

Lack of mundane realism as recalling letters after counting is not a realistic application of memory everyday

46
New cards

Reductionism

The belief that a behaviour is best explained by simplifying a part of how it works to identify cause and effect

47
New cards

Holism

Theory that tries to understand the entire behaviour, taking into account many different factors to explain it

48
New cards

Strengths of reductionism

It produces quantitative data which means it is able to identify cause and effect. It is also more scientific

49
New cards

Weaknesses of reductionism

Overly simplistic may lead to ignoring other important factors

50
New cards

Strengths of holism

Provides a larger and deeper understanding of a particular behaviour

51
New cards

Weaknesses of holism

Qualitative data can be seen as unscientific since you cannot identify cause and effect as you investigate many variables at one time. It also applies to only one person

52
New cards

Example of reductionism and why

Multistore model of memory because it states that rehearsal is the only factor which affects our recall. It also states that encoding will definitely result in retrieval however omissions, familiarisation, rationalisation and transformations can also affect it

53
New cards

How is reconstructive memory an example of holism

It takes into account someone's schema which means that Bartlett understands that someone's entire life experiences will contribute to their recall. He researched into each individual to grasp their schemas before conducting the experiment

54
New cards

How are experiments an example of reductionism

They isolate one variable to identify cause and effect without considering other possible contributing factors