Educational policies

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/16

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

17 Terms

1
New cards
1944 Butler Education Act (Conservative Govt 1909-1997)
→ Tripartite system

* Grammar schools (mostly m/c, exams, etc.)
* Secondary Modern (mostly w/c, no exams)
* Technical Schools (mostly w/c, aimed at manual professions)

→ 11+ exam
2
New cards
Evaluation of the Butler Education Act
→ Only 2 types of schools acc built (grammar/sec mod)

→ Not seen as equal, grammar seen as ‘better’

→ Secondary modern was primarily w/c, no exams so limited their opportunities
3
New cards
Who benefitted from the tripartite system?
→ M/c boys

* Fewer grammar schools for girls
* Higher pass rate for girls in the 11+
* Easier for m/c to pass as they had access to better resources
4
New cards
Comprehensives 1966 (Conservative Govt. 1909-97)
→ All pupils would attend their local comprehensive school
5
New cards
Evaluation of comprehensives
→ Not all areas ‘went comprehensive’

→ Setting and streaming in these schools

→ Claims it would lower educational standards
6
New cards
Who benefitted from comprehensives?
→ W/c students had more equal chance

→ BUT m/c still benefitted from setting/streaming
7
New cards
Education Reform Act 1988 (Conservative Govt 1909-97)
→ ==**Marketisation/parentocracy**==; league tables, SATs, formula funding, OFSTED, open enrolment

→ ==**Curriculum reforms**==; National Curriculum, Modular GCSEs, coursework
8
New cards
Evaluation of the Ed Reform Act 1988
→ League tables led to ==**cream-skimming**== + ==**educational triage**==

→ Not all parents have equal power to make choices (==**myth of parentocracy**==)
9
New cards
Who benefitted from the EdReform Act 1988
→ M/c parents had ==**cultural/economic capital**== to make best choices

* ^^**Gerwitz**^^; skilled choosers (m/c) vs disconnected local choosers (w/c)

→ Girls benefitted from National Curriculum/coursework

→ Ethnic minorities had **ethnocentric curriculum**
10
New cards
Labour govt 1997-2010
→ ==**Continued marketisation**==; specialist schools/academies to increase choice, uni tuition fees

→ ==**Curriculum reform**==; Curriculum 2000, AS/A2 exams

→ ==**Compensatory education**==; Education Action Zones, EMA for post-16 education, Aim Higher, SureStart
11
New cards
Evaluation of labour policies
→ Contradictory

* EMAs helped low income students stay in school, but also introduced fees for higher education

→ Mixed evidence on whether or not academies have raised standards
12
New cards
Who benefitted from labour’s policies?
→ M/c still benefitted from marketisation policies

→ BUT helped increase number of w/c students in edcuation + going to university
13
New cards
Coalition Govt 2010-2015
→ ==**Continued marketisation**==; free schools (set up by charities, parents, etc.), increased academies, increased tuition

→ ==**Curriculum**==; linear A-Levels, phasing out modular GCSEs

→ ==**Compensatory**==; FSM at foundation level, pupil premium
14
New cards
Evaluation of coalition govt policies
→ Fragmented centralisation, with increased number of academies

→ Spending cuts

* Sure Start
* School buildings
* Increased tuition fees
* Cancelled out pupil premium; extra money often goes to electricity etc lol

→ Free schools were only really set up in m/c areas
15
New cards
Who benefits from the Coalition govt’s policies?
→ M/c still benefit most from marketisation

→ W/c have a bigger fear of debt in going to uni
16
New cards
Conservative Govt 2015-now
→ Increase in multi-academy trusts

→ Primary schools becoming academies

→ Bringing back vocational education (shows influence of ^^**New Right**^^**)**; **T-Levels**
17
New cards
Who benefits from conservative govt modern policies?
M/c benefits from marketisation

W/c may benefit from vocational education?