Procedural Impropriety in Judicial Review

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/9

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards focused on the vocabulary related to procedural impropriety in judicial review as outlined in the lecture notes.

Law

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

Procedural Impropriety

The failure to observe basic rules of natural justice or to act with procedural fairness.

2
New cards

Natural Justice

The legal principle that ensures fairness in legal proceedings, including the right to a fair hearing and the right to be heard.

3
New cards

The Gunning Principles

Guidelines for consultations which require that they occur at a formative stage, include sufficient reasoning, allow adequate time for response, and consider the outcomes.

4
New cards

Illegality

One of the grounds under which administrative action is subject to control by judicial review, involving actions that are not authorized by law.

5
New cards

Bias

An inclination or prejudice that prevents objective judgment; particularly relevant in legal contexts where decision-makers may be influenced by personal interests.

6
New cards

Audi Alteram Partem

A Latin phrase meaning 'hear the other side,' emphasizing the necessity of giving all parties involved a fair chance to present their case.

7
New cards

Legitimate Expectations

The belief that the outcome of a decision-making process will align with previously established procedures or promises.

8
New cards

Context Dependency

The principle that fairness and procedural requirements must be evaluated based on the specific circumstances of each case.

9
New cards

Direct Bias

A situation in which a decision-maker has a personal or financial interest in the outcome of a case, leading to automatic disqualification.

10
New cards

Apparent Bias

A perception of bias where a reasonable observer may conclude that a decision-maker might not be impartial, even if no actual bias exists.