1/30
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
3 steps to approaching a remedies question
(1) determine the substantive law and what type of tort or contract is at issue; (2) make sure the Plaintiff is going to win; and (3) determine which remedies require discussion. This must be done in the order of: (1) legal remedies; (2) legal and equitable restitutionary remedies; and (3) equitable remedies
Tort Legal Remedies
Various money damages
Tort Restitutionary Remedies
(1) legal restititutionary remedies; (2) restitutionary damages; (3) replevin; (4) ejectment; (5) equitable restitutionary remedies; (6) constructive trusts; and (7) equitable liens
Tort Equitable Remedies
Injunctive Relief
3 main damage types
Compensatory, nominal, punitive
General Compensatory Damages
Foreseeable losses for the plaintiff, such as pain and suffering
Special Compensatory Damages
Not necessarily foreseeable, such as wage losses, and must be specifically pleaded
Four Requirements for Recovering Damages
(1) Actual causation; (2) foreseeability (proximate causation); (3) certainty (not too speculative; (4) unavoidability (duty to mitigate)
Certainty Rules: Economic Losses
Damages calculation must be done with sufficient certainty
Non-economic Losses (General Damages)
Basic certainty rules do not apply. The jury may award any amount it wishes within the judge’s instructions
Form of Judgment Payment
The award must be a single lump sum payment. Installment payments are not allowed
Calculation of Compensatory Damages
The award must be discounted to present value and traditionally inflation is not considered
Nominal Damages
Nominal damages are often recoverable when no actual injury is sustained, and they serve to establish or vindicate the plaintiff’s rights. Harmless trespass often results in nominal damages
Punitive Damages
Damages to punish a defendant for “willful, wanton, or malicious conduct.” Generally limited to intentional torts but some applicability to reckless misconduct
Punitive Damages 3 Rules
(1) P must have first been awarded compensatory or nominal damages, or restitutionary damages; (2) the defendant’s type of fault must be greater than negligence; (3) the punitive damages are no more than 10 times the compensatory damages
Punitive Damages Due Process Limitations
Key issue: fair notice of the possible magnitude of the punitive damages. Factors: (1) reprehensibility of the defendant’s conduct; (2) disparity between the actual or potential harm suffered by P and the punitive award; and (3) the difference between the punitive damages award and the criminal or civil penalties authorized for comparable conduct.
Punitive Damages Due Process Calc: NonParties
Injuries to nonparties may be used to assess the reprehensibility of the conduct but may not be used to determine the amount to be awarded
Interest and Attorneys’ Fees
Awards of prejudgment interest are generally statutory. Attorneys’ fees generally aren’t recoverable absent contract or a statute, except for prevailing plaintiffs in shareholders’ derivative suits
Restitutionary Availability in Torts
Generally, restitutionary damages are only available in tort cases where the tort results in a benefit to the defendant
3 Bar exam Damages Fact Patterns
(1) only compensatory damages are available; (2) only restitutionary damages are available; or (3) both are available
Replevin
A legal remedy that permits the plaintiff to recover, before trial, possession of specific chattel wrongfully taken or detained. Generally requires a judicial hearing
Replevin 2 part test
For replevin to be available, it must be established that: (1) the plaintiff has a right to possession; and (2) there is wrongful withholding by the defendant
Ejectment
Ejectment is a legal remedy to restore possession of real property from which plaintiff was wrongfully ousted
Ejectment 2 part test
Must establish: (1) plaintiff has a right to possession; and (2) wrongful withholding by the defendant
Constructive Trusts
An equitable restitutionary remedy that is imposed on improperly acquired property to which defendant has title. It creates a “trust” where the defendant is the trustee and has the duty to return the property to the plaintiff (beneficiary)
Constructive Trust Requirements
(1) Defendant has title to the property and defendant’s acquisition of title can be traced to the property that defendant wrongfully acquired; (2) the defendant’s retention of the property would result in unjust enrichment; and (3) the plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law (unique property or insolvent defendant will suffice)
Constructive Trust advantages over Monetary Restitution
Plaintiff becomes a secured creditor (entitled to recover the specific property constituting the trust res) and the plaintiff gets the benefit of any enhanced value of the property
Constructive Trust Defenses
Usual equitable defenses apply: laches, unclean hands, transfer of legal title to BFP
Equitable Lien
A lien imposed on the defendant’s property to secure payment of a debt owed to the plaintiff. Property will be subjected to an immediate court-directed sale and the money received goes to the plaintiff. If this amount is less than the fair market value of the property when it was taken, a deficiency judgment will issue for the difference
Requirements for Equitable Lien
(1) Defendant holds title to the property and the title can be traced to the wrongfully obtained property; (2) defendant’s retention would result in unjust enrichment; and (3) P has no adequate remedy at law
Equitable Lien vs Constructive Trust
Constructive trust is not available if plaintiff’s property was not used to acquire title. Constructive trust can be used to recover enhanced value but equitable lien cannot. Plaintiff may seek a deficiency judgment after imposing an equitable lien but not a constructive trust.