1/57
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Hippocrates
Personality linked to balance of bodily fluids ('humors').
Pythagoras
Personality determined by season of birth.
Formal study
Only ~100 years old.
Predicts important outcomes
Examples include job performance, health, relationships.
Helps improve environments
Applicable in education, workplaces, therapy.
Challenges assumptions
Examples include 'opposites attract' and 'absence makes the heart grow fonder.'
Experiments
Research method involving manipulation of variables.
IV (Independent Variable)
What researcher manipulates.
DV (Dependent Variable)
What researcher measures/what may change.
Hypothesis
Testable educated guess.
Confounds
Other variables that explain results, solved with random assignment.
Correlational Studies
Examine relationships as they occur in nature without manipulation.
Positive correlation
Both variables increase together.
Negative correlation
One variable increases while the other decreases.
Correlation coefficient
Ranges from -1 to +1 indicating strength and direction.
Advantages of Correlational Studies
Easier, cheaper, practical when manipulation is impossible.
Disadvantages of Correlational Studies
No cause-and-effect conclusions.
Case Studies
In-depth study on one person, useful for rare phenomena.
Limitation of Case Studies
Hard to generalize, no comparison group.
Self-report
Methods include interviews, questionnaires, experience sampling.
Observer reports
Gathered from friends, family, strangers.
Lab tasks
Examples include aggression paradigm, BART, marshmallow test.
Physiological data
Includes HR, skin conductance, EEG, lie detectors.
Projective tests
Examples include Rorschach, TAT, sentence completion.
Life outcome data
Major life events such as marriage, divorce, jobs.
Reliability
Consistency in measurement.
Test-retest reliability
Stability of results over time.
Inter-rater reliability
Agreement among raters.
Validity
Accuracy in measuring what it should.
Predictive validity
Forecasts future outcomes.
Concurrent validity
Matches established tests.
Key point about reliability and validity
Reliability is necessary for validity, but not sufficient.
IRB
Protects human participants.
Exempt
No risk, no vulnerable groups.
Expedited
Minimal risk.
Full review
More than minimal risk/vulnerable populations.
IACUC
Ensures animal welfare.
Ethical guidelines
Informed consent, confidentiality, right to withdraw.
Deception
Only if necessary + debriefing required.
Safety plans
For sensitive research.
Carelessness
Fix with duplicate/infrequency items.
Faking
Good (look better) or Bad (look worse). Fix: Social desirability checks or fake symptom items.
Response sets
Yea-saying, nay-saying, extreme responding. Fix: Reverse-coded items.
Barnum Effect
Vague personality statements apply to anyone.
Illusory Correlation
Believing two rare events are related (due to selective attention).
Base Rates
People ignore actual probabilities when interpreting traits.
Traits
Stable across time and situations.
Single Trait
Focus on one trait (e.g., self-esteem).
Many Trait
Start with outcome, then examine many predictors.
Essential Trait
Narrow down the 'core' traits.
Theoretical approach
Guided by theory.
Lexical approach
All important traits are in language.
Statistical (Factor Analysis)
Groups correlated traits into clusters.
Big Five (OCEAN)
1. Openness - imaginative, curious. 2. Conscientiousness - organized, disciplined. 3. Extraversion - sociable, energetic. 4. Agreeableness - cooperative, trusting. 5. Neuroticism - emotional instability, stress-reactive.
Typological Approach
Places people into categories (e.g., Myers-Briggs, Caspi).
Criticisms of Typological Approach
Low reliability, low predictive validity, arbitrary cut-offs.
Correlation
No cause & effect.
Case study
Depth not breadth.