Defamation & Privacy: Core Principles and Privacy Tort Flashcards

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/30

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

A comprehensive set of vocabulary-style flashcards covering defamation basics (publication, identification, defamatory meaning, serious harm, defenses, remedies, and statutes) and the emerging statutory privacy tort (elements, key cases, and recent reforms).

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

31 Terms

1
New cards

Publication (Defamation)

Material communicated to at least one third party.

2
New cards

Identification (Defamation)

Plaintiff named or identifiable by context (including implied identification; can be a small group).

3
New cards

Defamatory Imputation / Defamatory Meaning

An ordinary reasonable reader/viewer would think less of the plaintiff from the material, considering the whole context.

4
New cards

Serious Harm (Defamation, 2021 threshold)

Actual or likely serious harm to reputation; prevents trivial or vexatious claims; aligns with UK Defamation Act 2013.

5
New cards

Truth (Justification) Defence

Imputations are substantially true.

6
New cards

Honest Opinion Defence

A statement of opinion honestly held on a matter of public interest, presented as opinion not fact.

7
New cards

Qualified Privilege Defence

Limited protection where the publisher has a duty/interest to communicate and acts reasonably.

8
New cards

Public Interest Defence (2021)

Protects reporting on matters of public importance, when in the public interest.

9
New cards

New Public Interest Defence (2021)

If publication was in the public interest and responsibly made.

10
New cards

Statutory Defences (Defamation)

Defences provided under statutory schemes (e.g., ACT legislation).

11
New cards

Remedies: Damages

Monetary compensation; may include aggravated damages depending on conduct.

12
New cards

Remedies: Injunctions

Court order to stop ongoing or future publication.

13
New cards

Remedies: Apology/Correction

Formal apology or correction to mitigate damages.

14
New cards

Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT)

ACT statute defining defamation as publication diminishing a person’s reputation.

15
New cards

Reputation (Defamation)

What others think of a person; an objective standard independent of the plaintiff’s view.

16
New cards

Material (Defamation Publication)

Words, images, video, or online posts constituting the defamatory material.

17
New cards

Peros v Nationwide News Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2) [2024] QSC 192

Not all imputations meet the serious harm threshold; confirms the need for evidence of serious harm post-2021 reforms.

18
New cards

UK Defamation Act 2013

Influences Australian reforms; introduced the serious harm threshold and modern defenses.

19
New cards

Internet Intermediaries & Digital Platforms Liability (2023)

Clarified liability and safe harbour considerations for platforms hosting content.

20
New cards

Stage 2 Reforms (2024–25)

Ongoing reforms; Tasmania enacted March 2025; law unsettled in parts of the system.

21
New cards

Privacy Tort (Australia) 2025

New cause of action commencing 10 June 2025; protects intrusion into seclusion and misuse of private information.

22
New cards

Core Privacy Tort Elements: Intentional/Reckless Conduct

Conduct intended or recklessly engaged in regarding private information or intrusion.

23
New cards

Core Privacy Tort Elements: Intrusion into Seclusion

Unreasonable intrusion into solitude or private affairs.

24
New cards

Core Privacy Tort Elements: Misuse/Disclosure of Private Information

Unauthorized use or disclosure of highly private information.

25
New cards

Reasonable Expectation of Privacy

Plaintiff must have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the disclosed information.

26
New cards

Highly Offensive to a Reasonable Person

The conduct or disclosure must be highly offensive to ordinary sensibilities.

27
New cards

No Overriding Public Interest (Privacy Tort)

Public interest cannot justify invasion of privacy in the circumstances.

28
New cards

Grosse v Purvis [2003] QDC 151

Early Australian case recognizing invasion of privacy as a cause of action (not binding, influential).

29
New cards

Giller v Procopets [2008] VSCA 236

Disclosures of intimate material led to damages for breach of confidence and mental harm.

30
New cards

Waller v Barrett [2024] VCC 962

Wrongful disclosure of private medical/identity information; upheld strong privacy protections.

31
New cards

Exam Tip: Defamation vs Privacy

Defamation = false or damaging reputational statements; privacy focuses on protection of private information.