1/22
TBC
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Assurance services/engagement
designed to enhance the degree of confidence of the intended users other than the responsible party
General objective of ASSURANCE engagement
ENHANCE THE CREDIBILITY OF INFORMATION about the outcome of the evaluation or measurement of a subject matter against criteria
Objective of ASSURANCE engagement
Provide HIGH and MODERATE level of assurance
REASONABLE assurance engagement
LIMITED assurance engagements
Types of ASSURANCE engagements
REASONABLE assurance engagement / HIGH level
engagements that provide HIGH, but NOT ABSOLUTE, level of assurance.
LIMITED assurance engagements
engagements that provide only a “moderate” level of assurance.
Assertion based engagements / attestation engagements
evaluation or measurement of the subject matter is performed by the responsible party
Direct reporting engagements
practitioner directly performs the evaluation or measurement of the subject matter
practitioner obtains a representation from the responsible party that has performed the evaluation
Suitable criteria
Written assurance report
Appropriate subject matter
Three party relationship
Sufficient appropriate evidence
Elements of Assurance Engagements
Practitioner
Performs the assurance engagment
Responsible party
Responsible for the subject matter or assertion
Intended user/s
Whom the practitioner prepares the assurance report, usually addressed in said report
Subject matter
Information to be evaluated
Subject matter information
Outcome of the evaluation
Financial performance or conditions
Non-financial performance or condition
Physical characteristics
Systems and processes
Behavior
Forms of subject matter of assurance engagement
Criteria
Standard used to measure subject matter
Relevance
Completeness
Reliability
Neutrality
Understandability
Characteristics of suitable criteria
Established criteria
Criteria embodied by law or regulations
Specifically developed criteria
Specifically designed for the purpose
Professional skepticism
Practitioner must have a questioning mind
Evidence
Information obtained by the practitioner
Sufficiency
Measure of quantity of evidence
Appropriateness
Measure of the quality of evidence, relevance and reliability