1/17
#1
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
reasoning
the process whereby a person changes their system of belief on the basis of reasons. ; Simply: A mental process that ends with a conclusion
critical thinking
the process whereby a person evaluates a system of belief, reasoning, and one's confidence in them (including one's own beliefs, reasoning, and confidence). ; Simply: a process we use to evaluate our system of beliefs.
conclusion
A statement or belief that can either be true or false
system of belief
Includes not only their beliefs, but also the relationships between those beliefs
proposition
the meaning or information content of a statement (people can share this, but not necessarily share a belief.)
statement
a sentence that is either true or false
argument
a group of statements (premises), one or more of which, are claimed to provide support for one of the others (conclusion). ; Simply: statements (reasons/premises/evidence) that support statement (conclusion)
premises
the statements (reasons) offered in support of the conclusion.
identifying argument obstacle: CONDITIONAL CLAIMS
a sentence that says that one thing is dependent on another (if… then)
identifying argument obstacle: OPINONS
an idea or claim as particularly controversial, uncertain, or debatable.
logical strength
depends on the quality of the argument structure and the truth in the premises of the argument.
cooperative dialogue
a form of communication between two or more people that has at its heart a shared effort to learn, understand, figure out, or decide something. (**A SHARED GOAL, INQUIRY, EFFORT TO UNDERSTAND, ETC IS KEY) ; simply: a shared effort to figure out or decide something.
cooperative disagreement
disputants work together for the sake of understanding the disagreement, and ultimately for the sake of deeper understanding of the disputed issue overall. ; Simply: lets find out why we disagree and then discuss the reasons
cooperative persuasion (not manipulative!!)
The difference has to do with whether their goal is to persuade you by means of helping you to understand something in order to make a good decision, or merely to get you to believe or act in accordance with their wishes.
obstacles to co dialogue
competing interests and goals
we want people not to think lowly of us so we avoid conflict/controversy
identity beliefs that we tie to ourselves
guidelines to productive co dialogue
mutual respect
remember we are all fallible
separate people from their ideas to avoid defensiveness and disengagement
choose your words carefully regarding how u express ur disagreement
don’t expect closure, u just want a better understanding
indicator words
words an author uses to indicate they are making an argument like ‘since’, ‘because’, ‘for’, ‘on account of’, and ‘given that…’, specifically indicate the presence of a premise.
evaluate
thinking critically about the reasoning which supports our existing beliefs or a particular change in our system of belief.