1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Who proposed the Multi-store model of memory?
Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968)
How does the MSM describe memory?
A linear proces made up of three separate stores: sensory register, STM, LTM
What is coding?
the format in which information is stored.
What is capacity?
Amount of info that can be held in a memory store
What is duration?
Length of time info can be held in a memory store
Features of the sensory register
Coding: each sense has a store- modality specific
Capacity: very large
Duration: approximately 250 milliseconds
What is the sensory register?
A short duration store that holds information we have gained through the 5 senses. If attention paid, transfers to STM, otherwise lost via decay
Features of the STM
Coding: acoustic- confusion when materials sound same
Capacity: 7 +/- 2 (5-9 items)- can increase capacity by chunking items as reduces no.separate items
Duration: 18-30 seconds- can extend by rehearsal
No rehearsal- info lost via decay (displacement/fades over)
How does the MSM suggest information transfers to LTM?
Prolonged rehearsal. The information can be retrieved from LTM into STM (pulls into current thinking)
Features of the LTM
Coding: semantic
Capacity: unlimited
Duration: potentially forever
Forgetting often caused by interference or retrieval failure
Empirical evidence: Glanzer and Cunitz's serial position findings (1966)
Provides strong support for the MSM through their research on the serial position effect
Found people tend to remember words from the beginning (primacy effect) and end (recency effect) of a list better than those in the middle
Suggest early words were rehearsed and stored in the LTM whilst most recent were still in STM
If a distraction was added before recall, recency effect disappeared showing that STM was disrupted due to imites capacity and duration, while LTM remained intact
Supports MSM's claim that STM + LTM are separate and functionally distinct stores
Clinical case studies: HM and Clive Wearing
Support, both had brain damage
Could hold info in STM but couldn't form new LTM due to damage to hippocampus
HM could remember a number for a short time but forgot it when distracted
Shows that STM and LTM operate separately as LTM is impaired while STM functions normally, rehearsal is essential for transferring information between them
Supports the MSM's idea of a linear memory process involving multiple stages
Cannot generalise from a case study
Challenging the simplicity of STM: KF case
Key criticism: STM is treated as a single unified store
Case of KF, studied by Shallice and Warrington (1970) challenges this as in the STM tests, KF had difficulty recalling verbal information but recalled visual material well
Suggests that STM is not one system but made up of different components for different types of information
Supports the WMM wich has seperate systems for verbal and visual processing, highlighting a major limitation in the MSM's explanation of STM