Community Health Final exam

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/15

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

16 Terms

1
New cards

Epidemiology

study of occurrences & distribution of health-related states or events in specified population, including the study of the determinants influencing such states & the application of this knowledge to control the health problem

2
New cards

crude mortality rate calculation

(number of deaths from a certain disease during a specified time divided by number of cases of that disease occurring w/i the same specified time period) multiplied by 100,000

3
New cards

crude mortality rate

compare the number of deaths from a specified cause w/i the entire population (ex. deaths from motor vehicle accidents)

4
New cards

specific mortality rate calculation

(total deaths from a specified cause during a specified time period in a population (subgroup) divided by average number of population (subgroup) w/i that specified time period) multiplied by 100,000

5
New cards

specific mortality rates

compare the number of deaths from a specific cause in a particular subgroup w/ that whole subgroup (ex., teenage male deaths from motor vehicle accidents)

6
New cards

prevalence rate calculation

number of people w/ given disease in given population at 1 point in time divided by total population in given population at same point in time

7
New cards

incidence rate calculation

number of NEW cases of given disease in a population during a specified time period divided by average total population w/i the same specified time period

8
New cards

temporal relationship

a person does not get the disease until after exposure to the cause (ex. H. pylori is clearly linked to chronic gastritis. about 11% of chronic pts will go on to develop duodenal ulcers over a 10-year period)

9
New cards

strength of association

exposure to a specific stressor or cause is most likely to bring on the disease b/c they are strongly associated (ex. H. pylori is found in at least 90% of pts w/ duodenal ulcer) (how strong is the link)

10
New cards

dose-response

persons who are most exposed to the contaminated food are the most ill (ex. density of H. pylori per square millimeter of gastric mucosa is higher in pts w/ duodenal ulcers)

11
New cards

specificity

the cause is linked to a specific disease (ex. prevalence of H. pylori in pts w/ duodenal ulcers in 90-100%)

12
New cards

consistency

everyone who eats contaminated food gets the illness - if other food in another time & place is contaminated w/ the same bacteria, the same illness occurs (ex. duodenal ulcer is caused by H. pylori. whenever a person is exposed to H. pylori, they will get duodenal ulcer & not another disease)

13
New cards

biological plausibility

findings are consistent w/ the biological/medical knowledge that is known (ex. although originally it was difficult go envision a bacterium that infects the stomach antrum causing ulcers in the duodenum, it is now recognized that H. pylori has binding sites in antral cells & can follow these cells into the duodenum)

14
New cards

experimental replication

several studies done by different scientists in different places produce the same or similar results (ex. many of the observations regarding H. pylori have been replicated repeatedly)

15
New cards

coherence

how well assumptions about the causal relationship fit into existing theory (ex. smoking causes lung cancer - this relationship is coherent w/ existing biological & epidemiological theories. research has demonstrated that carcinogens in tobacco smoke cause mutations in lung cells, which aligns w/ existing models of cancer development)

16
New cards

analogy

association between analogous exposures & outcomes indicate a similar causal mechanism & many strengthen a causal arguments (ex. if thalidomide exposure during pregnancy causes birth defects, then another drug w/ a similar chemical structure might also pose a risk during pregnancy)