1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Can explain typicality effects
People find it easier to recognise or categorise typical members of a category and are faster to do so, which aligns with the idea that typical items share more salient features with the average representation.
In contrast, atypical members require more cognitive effort to categorise because they match fewer of the weighted features.
For example, people are quicker to identify a chair as a piece of furniture than a piano, even though both belong to the same category.
Avoids assumption that all concepts must have defining, all-or-nothing boundaries
Many categories do not have clear necessary and sufficient conditions. People may struggle to specify what makes something a “game, or a “bird,” yet they still use these categories effectively.
Family resemblance model explains this by proposing that there are no essential features. Instead, attributes have different weights depending on how salient or diagnostic they are.
For instance, most violins are made of wood, but an electric blue metal violin is still recognised as a violin because it shares the most important functional and perceptual attributes of the category.
Cognitively efficient
As it does not require individuals to store rigid rules for every category. Instead, people rely on similarity to a prototype, an abstracted mental representation formed from experience.
This allows quick categorisation without conscious analysis of features. While this model may not apply perfectly to all categories (such as mathematical or rule-based ones), it provides a more realistic account of how people structure and use concepts in the natural world.
c
k