1/29
When we generalize a property from one category (or member of a category) to another category ( or its members) Ex: Grizzly bears love onions. Therefore, all bears love onions
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Categorical Induction - Argument
A conclusion about a property of a category is drawn from information about another category
Grizzly bears love onions. Therefore, all bears love onions
Categorical Induction - Premise
The category you start with
Ex: Grizzly bears love onions
Categorical Induction - Predicate
The property being projected
Ex: Love Onions
Categorical Induction - Conclusion
The category you're projecting onto
Ex: Therefore, all bears like onions
Categorical Induction - Blank Predicate
The property
Ex: Onions
Premise-Conclusion Similarity
The principle that the more similar the premise and conclusion categories of a logical statement, the stronger the inductive argument will be
Ex: Bears -> Foxes VS Bears -> Mice
The Inclusion Fallacy
Claiming a general conclusion is more probable than a specific conclusion that is included in the general conclusion
Ex: Grizzly bears love onions. Therefore, all bears love onions. VS Grizzly bears love onions. Therefore, all Polar Bears love onions
Category Coherence
Related to how well the entities in the category seem to go together
Police Officer: less variability
Restaurant Waiter: greater variability
Representativeness Heuristic
Estimating the likelihood of events in terms of how well they seem to represent, or match, particular prototypes, may lead us to ignore other relevant information
Ex: someone carrying a briefcase and wearing a suit must be a lawyer
Conjunction Fallacy
When we assume multiple things are more likely to co-occur than a single thing on its own
Ex: It is more probable that "Mr. F. has had one or more heart attacks" than that "Mr. F. has had one or more heart attacks and he is over 55 years old".
Deductive Reasoning
reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case
Ex: The sun rises every morning; therefore, the sun will rise on Tuesday morning.
Valid Argument
There is only one possible conclusion given the premise
Sound Argument
a valid argument with true premises
The Structure of a logical task
premise, premise, conclusion
Premise: Your friend is waiting at Starbucks or the library
Premise: Your friend is not at Starbucks
Conclusion: Therefore, your friend is at the library
Belief Bias
the tendency for one's preexisting beliefs to distort logical reasoning, sometimes by making invalid conclusions seem valid, or valid conclusions seem invalid
Card Selection Tasks
These tasks assess people's ability to evaluate evidence and arrive at a deduction
Confirmation Bias
a tendency to search for information that supports our preconceptions and to ignore or distort contradictory evidence
Deonic Selection Tasks
The statements deal with permission rather than abstract premises
Premise: If a person is drinking alcohol, they are over 21
How many cards do you have to flip over to prove this to be true
Cards: Beer, Soda, 25, 17
stages of the decision making process
Identification stage, Framing, Generation Stage, and Judgement Stage
Framing
Involves stating the decision in terms of known costs and benefits, or perceived gains and losses
Anchoring
the tendency, in making judgments, to rely on the first piece of information encountered or information that comes most quickly to mind
Regulatory Focus
The motivational system can focus either on potential gains or potential losses
Regulatory Fit
The way people attempt to reach a goal can either match or not match with their regulatory focus
Ex: An advertisement for a juice drink framed to "prevent disease" is a better fit for someone with a prevention focus, while one framed to "enhance energy" is a better fit for someone with a promotion focus.
Ego Depletion
The idea that self-regulation is a limited resource, and if your resources get tired, your performance suffers.
Ex: making poor food choices after a long day of dieting
Parts of a problem
initial state (givens), obstacles (means), Goal
Stages of problem-solving
Preparation, Production, Evaluation, Incubation
(Do not have to go through every step)
Stages of problem-solving - Preparation
Here, the problem solver first understands that the problem exists (evaluates, frames, identifies well-defined or ill-defined)
Stages of problem-solving - Production
The problem solver begins to generate, produce, and work on potential solutions
Stages of problem-solving - Evaluation
Tentative solutions are evaluated further (likelihood for success, similarity between current state and the goal state)
Stages of problem-solving - Incubation
The problem solver is no longer explicitly trying to solve the problem, but they will return to it later