1/47
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Marbury v. Madison – Rule
Established judicial review; SCOTUS can strike down unconstitutional laws.
Marbury v. Madison – Issue
Does SCOTUS have authority to order delivery of commission?
Marbury v. Madison – Holding
No, Judiciary Act provision was unconstitutional.
Eakin v. Raub – Rule
Reinforced judicial review; dissent argued only legislature should decide constitutionality.
Eakin v. Raub – Issue
Should courts have power to declare laws unconstitutional?
Eakin v. Raub – Holding
Yes, but dissent opposed.
McCulloch v. Maryland – Rule
Necessary & Proper Clause expands federal power; states cannot tax federal government.
McCulloch v. Maryland – Issue
Can Congress create a bank and can states tax it?
McCulloch v. Maryland – Holding
Yes to bank, no to state tax.
Scott v. Sandford – Rule
Enslaved persons are not citizens; Missouri Compromise unconstitutional.
Scott v. Sandford – Issue
Is Scott a citizen entitled to sue in federal court?
Scott v. Sandford – Holding
No, enslaved persons cannot sue.
Baker v. Carr – Rule
Legislative apportionment is justiciable; established political question test.
Baker v. Carr – Issue
Is apportionment a political question or justiciable?
Baker v. Carr – Holding
Justiciable — courts can review.
Ex Parte McCardle – Rule
Congress can limit SCOTUS appellate jurisdiction under Exceptions Clause.
Ex Parte McCardle – Issue
Can Congress strip Court’s jurisdiction mid-case?
Ex Parte McCardle – Holding
Yes.
Nixon v. United States – Rule
Impeachment trials are a political question; Senate has sole authority.
Nixon v. United States – Issue
Can courts review Senate impeachment procedures?
Nixon v. United States – Holding
No, non-justiciable.
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife – Rule
Standing requires injury in fact, causation, redressability.
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife – Issue
Did plaintiffs have standing to sue?
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife – Holding
No, no concrete injury.
Powell v. McCormack – Rule
Congress cannot add qualifications; may only expel by 2/3 vote.
Powell v. McCormack – Issue
Can Congress exclude a duly elected member?
Powell v. McCormack – Holding
No.
U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton – Rule
States cannot impose qualifications for federal office.
U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton – Issue
Can states add qualifications for Congress?
U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton – Holding
No.
Gravel v. United States – Rule
Speech & Debate Clause protects legislators and aides in legislative acts, not private publication.
Gravel v. United States – Issue
Does the Speech and Debate clause protect aides and leaked publication?
Gravel v. United States – Holding
Yes for aides in legislative work; no for outside acts.
McGrain v. Daugherty – Rule
Congress has implied investigatory power to compel testimony.
McGrain v. Daugherty – Issue
Can Congress force testimony in investigations?
McGrain v. Daugherty – Holding
Yes.
Watkins v. United States – Rule
Congressional inquiries must have legislative purpose and respect rights.
Watkins v. United States – Issue
Are investigations unlimited in scope?
Watkins v. United States – Holding
No, limits exist.
Barenblatt v. United States – Rule
Congress may investigate even if it burdens rights, if pursuing valid legislative purpose.
Barenblatt v. United States – Issue
Did HUAC investigation violate First Amendment?
Barenblatt v. United States – Holding
No.
Trump v. Mazars – Rule
Congressional subpoenas for president require heightened scrutiny (balance need vs. burden).
Trump v. Mazars – Issue
Can Congress subpoena president’s financial records?
Trump v. Mazars – Holding
Yes in principle, but remanded with limits.
South Carolina v. Katzenbach – Rule
Congress has broad enforcement power under 15th Amendment.
South Carolina v. Katzenbach – Issue
Could Congress pass strong Voting Rights Act remedies?
South Carolina v. Katzenbach – Holding
Yes.