How to Practice Science - Week 1

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/5

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study design/RQ, etc

Last updated 10:21 AM on 9/27/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

6 Terms

1
New cards

What does study design involve? How would you go about designing a study?

Study design involves:

  • RQ and sub-questions

    • Embedding in previous RQ/research —> there’s always previous knowledge and research into a topic! How are you after something new?

  • Research plan/methodology

  • Relevance

  • Expected Outcome! (Hypothesis)


2
New cards

How do we conduct research? Why?

  • Discovery/understanding!

  • We use deductive reasoning = support our inductive reasoning (based on what is already known/may predict outcome), then conduct experiments to produce evidence from which we can deduce to draw valid conclusions

    • Deductive = from experiements, valid conclusions (e.g. conduct experiement and realize there are also black swans in australia)

    • Inductive = from previous knowledge/experience/observations, can draw conclusions, but must test, and not neccessarily valid (e.g. all swans i’ve seen are white, so swans are white)


3
New cards

What makes a good RQ?

Things to consider when constructing a RQ:

  • Why do we want to study something? What is the key question, concern or observation?

  • What data are needed? What type of data to collect?

  • How to design the study to get the data needed


Aspects of a good RQ:

  1. Embedded in discipline/research area

  2. Relevant → have a real purpose (specific or broad)

  3. Specific → very clear on what an answer will be/when there will be an answer or conclusion

  4. Functional → answerable + type of study connects


4
New cards

What types of RQ are there?

There are 5 types:

Descriptive:

  • Questions: What does it look like? Characteristics/qualities, etc.

  • Answer: List of characteristics/phases/elements without origin or causes

  • Not science fields → only when barely anything is known

  • Non-evaluative! No judgement of quality, value, etc.

  • E.g: “What does X look like?” or “What are most important steps in X?”


Comparison:

  • Questions: What are the differences between X and Y?

  • Answer: Overview of similarities/differences of the respective topic categorised and structured in a useful way

    • Potential topics: Two or more approaches, cultures, systems, objects, etc.


Definition:

  • Questions: In which category can X be placed? Does X belong to this family? What is the nature of X?

  • Answer: Statement on the extent to which a phenomenon may or may not be classified in a certain way


Evaluation:

  • Questions: What is the worth of X? What are the advantages/disadvantages of X?

  • Answer: Statement about the positive/negative characteristics of a phenomenon

    • e.g. impact of implementing a law or new technology


Explanation:

  • Questions: Why is X the way it is? How could X happen? What is X a consequence of?

  • Answer: Statement about the causes of a phenomenon observed.

    • Predictive power → often builds on descriptive research


5
New cards

What types of RQ are used in scientific research?

  1. Descriptive

  2. Relational

  3. Interventional


Relies of POCI:

P = Population

O = Outcome

C = Comparison/Connection

I = Intervention


<ol><li><p>Descriptive </p></li><li><p>Relational </p></li><li><p>Interventional </p></li></ol><p></p><p><strong>Relies of POCI:</strong></p><p>P = Population</p><p>O = Outcome </p><p>C = Comparison/Connection</p><p>I = Intervention </p><p></p>
6
New cards

What are common methodologies in science?

  1. Observational

  2. Experimental → includes lab work and simulation