1/50
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Marbury v Madison
Judicial Review, first major US supreme court case
McCulloch v Maryland
Established supremacy of national gov't over the state
Plessy v Ferguson
Separate but equal
Brown v Board of Education
Overturned Plessy v Ferguson (seperate but equal)
Gitlow v New York
Made the Bill of Rights applicable on the state level :
Mapp v Ohio
Established Exclusionary Rule under the 4th amend
Terry v Ohio
Modified Mapp v Ohio so that the police can search w reasonable doubt :
Gideon v Wainwright
Right to counsel in a trial, even if you can't afford a lawyer : "
Miranda v Arizona
Miranda Rights (read by a police officer during an arrest)
California v Bakke
Upheld affirmative action (if two people with equal qualifications are eligible for a position, the minority gets it) :
Roe v Wade
Abortion is a woman's right to privacy :
Tinker v Des Moines
The right to free speech goes beyond the spoken word (armbands)
Baker v Carr
One man, one vote (gerrymandering) :
Miller v California
Provided means of identifiying obscenity :
Buckley v Valeo
Individual campaign financing is protected under the first amendment
New York Times v Sullivan
Can't print libel/commit slander against public figures, not freedom of speech :
Dred Scott v Samford
Non-citizens are not protected under the Constitution :
Engel v Vitale
Establishment Clause, can't pray in school :
Gibbons v Ogden
Only Congress can control interstate commerce :
Bush v Gore
All votes are equal under the law
US v Nixon
Even the President is not above the rule of law :
Texas v Johnson
Flag-burning is protected by the 1st amendment :
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US
The Civil Rights Act is upheld by the Commerce Clause :
Lemon v Kurtzman
The Lemon Test, test for giving aid to church-related schools
Reynolds v US
Personal actions are protected/legal, but gov't actions aren't (Polygamy is illegal, but polyamory isn't) :
Griswold v Connecticut
Birth control is protected by the right to privacy :
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
You are allowed to disinclude people from an organization bc of freedom of association under the 1st amendment
Schenk v US
In wartime, freedom of speech is restricted :
Korematsu v US
Japanese internment in WWII was legal bc wartime permits nonconstitutional action :
Escobedo v Illinois
Right to counsel during questioning by police :
Lopez v US
Set limits to Congress's ability to interpret power from the Commerce Clause : /George Lopez limits Commerce/
Santa Fe Board v Doe
Student-led/initiated prayer at a school event violates the 1st amend. under the establishment clause :
Swann v Mecklenburg Board
Busing as a means of desegregation is legal :
Gonzales v Raich
Congress can criminalize marijuana on the basis of the Commerce Clause
Citizens United v FEC
Corporations can support candidates under the 1st amendment
Fletcher v Peck
Right to apply judicial review to state law
Dartmouth v Woodward
Upholds the sanctity of private contracts :
Brandenburg v Ohio
Advocating violence in speech for political reform is not illegal so long as it doesn't lead to unconstitutional action :
Duncan v Louisiana
RIght to trial by jury when a sentence of >2yrs is involved :
Abbington v Schempp
Prohibits indoctrinating bible study in public school, establishment clause :
Wesberry v Sanders
House districts need to be near equal in population :
Epperson v Arkansas
States can't ban teaching of evolution : "
Furman v Georgia
There needs to be a degree of consistency in the death penalty by state :
Gregg v Georgia
Capital punishment doesn't violate the 8th Amendment :
Webster v Reproductive Health Service
Regulation of abortion does not violate Roe v Wade :
Shaw v Reno
No racial gerrymandering :
Parker v Gladden
Juries should be impartial :
Barron v Baltimore
The same rules for eminent domain that apply to the federal govt DON't apply to states :
Near v Minnesota
Upheld freedom of the press :
Everson v Board of Education
Establishment clause applies to state law :
Palko v Connecticut
Harsher sentence on an appealed trial doesn't violate double jeopardy :