Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
5 steps for null hypothesis significance testing
hypothesis
data
evaluate inconsistency with H0
reject or fail to reject
interpret the findings (in terms of the hypothesis)
2 types of hypothesis
null (H0)
research/alter (H1)
2 types of tailed hypothesis
1 tailed (directional)
2 tailed (non directional)
1 tailed hypothesis
left/lower (hypothetical mean < given value)
right/higher (hypothetical mean > given value)
2 tailed hypothesis
hypothetical mean > given value OR hypothetical mean < given value
2 z scores (± the same number)
* z score probability by 2
what is the null hypothesis
no difference
the sample won’t have an atypical mean from the parent population
H0 = sample came from a population where hypothetical population mean & sample mean are equal
what is the research hypothesis
there is a difference
H1 sample came from a population where hypothetical population mean is higher than sample mean
what data do you need to collect from step 2
sample mean & population parameters
how to evaluate data in step 3
assume H0 is true so sample & population mean are the same
calculate sample z score
large probability = not inconsistent with H0
small probability = inconsistent with H0
when do you reject the null hypothesis
p < 0.05 (data is inconsistent with H0)
when do you fail to reject the null hypothesis
p > 0.05 (data is consistent with H0)
type 1 & type 2 errors table (draw)
what is a type 1 error
rejecting the null hypothesis when its true
happens naturally (5% by random sampling error)
what is a type 2 error
failing to reject the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis isn’t true
happens when there is a problem with the study (bias sample, sample size too small, error in experimental tasks)