Interview/Interrogation Quiz 2

Escobedo v. Illinois

guaranteed the right to a lawyer

Commonwealth v. Baye

misleading statements about due process rights is not allowed in deception

Davis v. U.S.

ambiguous requests for counsel during a custodial interrogation, the interrogator does not need to stop questioning

Berghuis v. Thompkins

the SC allowed the confession saying that they had to affirmatively invoke their rights to remain silent

Florida v. Powell

Miranda requires that a suspect be warned prior to any questioning, it does not dictate the words in which the essential info must be conveyed

Rhode Island v. Innis

casual police conversation that a suspect overhears isn’t necessarily interrogation, even if it leads to incriminating statements.

JDB v. North Carolina

Juveniles under 18 need to be treated differently than adults during questioning

Ashcraft v. Tennessee

confession taken after 36 hours of non-stop interrogation was involuntary

Maryland v. Shatzer

Set a minimum fourteen-day waiting period the time suspect is released from custody and when the police can reinitiate interrogation after the suspect initially invoked his or her right to counsel pursuant to Miranda

Dunaway v. New York

bringing a suspect into custody for questioning is subject to the same probable cause standards as an arrest