1/30
BTW - DON'T NECESSARILY BELIEVE ME AB THE TENSION FLASHCARDS BC THEYRE MADE UP
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
what was happening towards the end of ww2
allies were holding meetings determining nature of post-war world
3 reasons for mistrust between ussr and west pre-war
communism vs capitalism
russia withdrew from ww1
nazi-soviet pact 1939
5 western aims post-war
west + USSR cooperate
germany rebuilt - independant, democratic
liberatred countries in eastern europe = self-determination, no spheres of influence
UN formed
intl economic cooperation - World Bank, IMF
5 USSR aims post-war (same categories diff points)
USSR cooperate w USA + UK
germany remain weak - never threaten USSR
spheres of influence for USSR security
german industry pay for USSR rebuilding
USSR make own decisions:
no IMF, no World Bank
UN to a degree
first major meeting between ussr uk and america
tehran 1943
next meeting after tehran
only churchill and stalin
oct 1944 in moscow
what happened in the 1944 moscow meeting
percentages agreement - written by churchill, agreed by stalin
(how liberated eastern europe was gonna be divided)
when was the yalta conference
feb 1945
who was at the yalta conference
winston churchill
franklin roosevelt
joseph stalin
churchill approach to yalta
limit soviet expansion
look after british interests
close US relationship
shown in percentages agreement
got on w stalin but not much compromise
roosevelt approach to yalta
work w USSR to rebuild europe
europe capitalist = no war
may have misunderstood stalin (thought they wanted same thing)
stalin approach to yalta
no war again
recognised need for USA + UK
prepared to negotiate despite idealogical diff
6 points agreed between the ‘big three’ at yalta
stalin enter japan war
help control japan post-war future
divide germany + berlin into 4
punish ppl responsible for genocide
liberated west + central europe = free elections
join UN
eastern europe = ‘soviet sphere of influence’
main disagreement at yalta
about poland
stalin ops on poland
wanted USSR border to extend into it
said it could then move its other border into germany
churchill ops on poland
didn’t approve of stalins plan
couldnt do anything as red army (stalin’s) controlled poland + east germany
said USSR cant interfere in greece (british tryna prevent communist takeover) - accepted
roosevelt ops on poland
didnt approve of stalins plan
churchill convinced him to agree
yalta overall effect on tension
short term = countries close + cooperative
long term = responsible for things that led to tension later (eg. germany split, soviet sphere of influence)
when was potsdam
july 1945
potsdam aim
action plans made at yalta
3 changes at potsdam compared to yalta
leaders
stalin’s armies in eastern europe
stalin’s discovery of USA atomic bomb
who was at potsdam
harry truman (USA)
clement attlee (UK)
joseph stalin
truman approach to potsdam
similar to roosevelt:
europe countries self-determination
intl cooperation
diff to roosevelt:
unfriendly w stalin
thought he didnt wanna cooperate
worried ab USSR power in e-eu
willing to use force to achieve aims
US had worlds first atomic bomb
attlee approach to potsdam
worried ab USSR expansion in e-eu
stay close to USA to keep power
keep germany safe from attack
stalin approach to potsdam
didnt trust USA
europe power rival
truman not roosevelt
atomic bombs
war won + red army in e-eu = less compromise
potsdam key agreements (4)
germany divided (like yalta)
nazi party banned - leaders = war criminals
germans in poland, hungary, czechoslovakia back to germany
poland lose some land to USSR
3 major disagreements potsdam
germany
reparations
soviet policy e-eu
disagreement on germany
STALIN
cripple germany, protect USSR
TRUMAN
not repeat treaty of versailles
disagreement on reparations
STALIN
$10bn from germany
TRUMAN
dont repeat treaty of versailles
disagreement over soviet policy in e-eu
STALIN
pro-soviet gvts in e-eu
‘unite’ them
protect USSR
TRUMAN
stalin wants soviet empire in eu
no
potsdam overall effect on tensions/relations
short term: increase tension as countries less agreement BUT did action some prev agreed plans + moral plans like nazi party banned
long term: handling of e-eu leads to future tensions